Facilitating Classroom Economics Experiments With an Emerging Technology: The Case of Clickers

The audience response system (ARS) has increasingly been used to engage students by eliciting and analyzing responses to questions posed by instructors. The authors discuss how they used the system to facilitate pit market trading in a microeconomics class, report the efficacy of the approach and provide suggestions extending the use of ARS to other experiments. Using the ARS to facilitate active learning by engaging students in economics experiments has pedagogical advantages over both the labor-intensive approach of pencil-and-paper and the capital-intensive route of relying on networked or on-line computer labs which oftentimes preclude or restrict face-to-face student interactions. Thus, the new method represents an added advantage on top of such conventional functions as taking attendance and administering quizzes of this increasingly popular classroom technology.

[1]  J. Potters,et al.  Assessing the efficacy of gaming in economics education. , 1997 .

[2]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[3]  D. Hester.  Instructional Simulation of a Commercial Banking System , 1991 .

[4]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Classroom Assessment Techniques , 1993 .

[5]  Thomas A. Angelo,et al.  Classroom assessment techniques : a handbook for collegeteachers / Thomas A. Angelo, K. Patricia Cross , 1993 .

[6]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Voluntary Provision of a Public Good , 1999 .

[7]  Classroom Games: Strategic Interaction on the Internet , 1999 .

[8]  Rodney Garratt,et al.  A Free Entry and Exit Experiment , 2000 .

[9]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[10]  Brian Ironside,et al.  Double-Auction Market Simulation Software for Very Large Classes. , 2004 .

[11]  T. Bergstrom,et al.  Experiments with Economic Principles: Microeconomics , 1999 .

[12]  James M. Walker,et al.  Computerized Laboratory Exercises for Microeconomics Education: Three Applications Motivated by Experimental Economics. , 1993 .

[13]  Eugene Judson,et al.  Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls , 2002 .

[14]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events , 1991 .

[15]  Robert DeYoung.  Market Experiments: The Laboratory versus the Classroom , 1993 .

[16]  N. Scott Cardell,et al.  Laboratory-Based Experimental and Demonstration Initiatives in Teaching Undergraduate Economics , 1996 .

[17]  R. Higgins,et al.  The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning , 2002 .

[18]  Craig T. Schulman,et al.  CLASSROOM EXPERIMENTS: NOT JUST FUN AND GAMES , 2007 .

[19]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Bradley J. Ruffle.  Competitive Equilibrium and Classroom Pit Markets , 2003 .

[21]  Tisha L. N. Emerson,et al.  Comparing Student Achievement across Experimental and Lecture-Oriented Sections of a Principles of , 2004 .

[22]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[23]  A. Cox,et al.  Enhanced student learning in the introductory physics laboratory , 2002 .

[24]  D. A. Wells.  Laboratory Experiments for Undergraduate Instruction in Economics , 1991 .

[25]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[26]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.