Factors Associated with Attrition in a Longitudinal Cohort of Older Adults in the Community.

Introduction Retaining participants in longitudinal studies increases their power. We undertook this study in a population-based longitudinal cohort of adults with COPD to determine the factors associated with increased cohort attrition. Methods In the longitudinal population-based Canadian Cohort of Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study, 1561 adults > 40 years old were randomly recruited from 9 urban sites. Participants completed in-person visits at 18-month intervals and also were followed up every 3 months over the phone or by email. The cohort retention for the study and the reasons for attrition were analyzed. Hazard ratios and robust standard errors were calculated using Cox regression methods to explore the associations between participants who remained in the study and those who did not. Results The median follow-up (years) of the study is 9.0 years. The overall mean retention was 77%. Reasons for attrition (23%) were: dropout by participant (39%), loss of contact (27%), investigator-initiated withdrawal (15%), deaths (9%), serious disease (9%), and relocation (2%). Factors independently associated with attrition were lower educational attainment, higher pack-year tobacco consumption, diagnosed cardiovascular disease, and a higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.43(1.11, 1.85); 1.01(1.00, 1.01); 1.44(1.13, 1.83); 1.06(1.02, 1.10) respectively. Conclusions Identification and awareness of risk factors for attrition could direct targeted retention strategies in longitudinal studies. Moreover, the identification of patient characteristics associated with study dropout could address any potential bias introduced by differential dropouts.

[1]  R. Pruchno,et al.  Understanding Attrition and Bolstering Retention in a Longitudinal Panel of Older Adults: ORANJ BOWL , 2021, Innovation in aging.

[2]  M. Ganguli,et al.  Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal population-based study of aging , 2020, International Psychogeriatrics.

[3]  Victor D. Dinglas,et al.  Association between participant contact attempts and reports of being bothered in a national, longitudinal cohort study of ARDS survivors. , 2020, Chest.

[4]  P. Bower,et al.  Designing and using incentives to support recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review and a checklist for design , 2019, Trials.

[5]  D. Needham,et al.  Factors associated with missed assessments in a 2-year longitudinal study of acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors , 2018, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[6]  D. Needham,et al.  Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates , 2017, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[7]  P. Adair,et al.  Identifying the participant characteristics that predict recruitment and retention of participants to randomised controlled trials involving children: a systematic review , 2016, Trials.

[8]  C. Theobald,et al.  Effect of Health Literacy on Research Follow-Up , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[9]  Georg Heinze,et al.  PSHREG: A SAS macro for proportional and nonproportional subdistribution hazards regression , 2015, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[10]  T. Kirkwood,et al.  Improving Retention of Very Old Participants in Longitudinal Research: Experiences from the Newcastle 85+ Study , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  A. Tuulio-Henriksson,et al.  Attrition in a 30-year follow-up of a perinatal birth risk cohort: factors change with age , 2014, PeerJ.

[12]  W. Mortenson,et al.  Challenges and strategies pertaining to recruitment and retention of frail elderly in research studies: a systematic review. , 2014, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[13]  F. Maltais,et al.  Quality Assurance of Spirometry in a Population-Based Study –Predictors of Good Outcome in Spirometry Testing , 2014, COPD.

[14]  Andrea Benedetti,et al.  Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD): Fulfilling the Need for Longitudinal Observational Studies in COPD , 2014, COPD.

[15]  C. Seale,et al.  Predictors of two forms of attrition in a longitudinal health study involving ageing participants: An analysis based on the Whitehall II study , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[16]  M. Benzeval,et al.  A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies , 2011, BMC public health.

[17]  S. Garland,et al.  Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia , 2011, BMC public health.

[18]  J. Bonk A Road Map for the Recruitment and Retention of Older Adult Participants for Longitudinal Studies , 2010, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[19]  D. Nutbeam The evolving concept of health literacy. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[20]  B. Given,et al.  Early participant attrition from clinical trials: role of trial design and logistics , 2008, Clinical trials.

[21]  M. Hadders‐Algra,et al.  How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? , 2008, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[22]  Michael K. Paasche-Orlow,et al.  The prevalence of limited health literacy , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  R. Ross,et al.  ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. , 2003, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[24]  D. O’Donnell,et al.  Dynamic hyperinflation and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[25]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[26]  Raisa B Gul,et al.  Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. , 2010, Journal of clinical nursing.

[27]  C. Brayne,et al.  A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[29]  J L Hankinson,et al.  Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[30]  Standardization of spirometry--1987 update. Statement of the American Thoracic Society. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[31]  Phillips Yy,et al.  Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, November 1986. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.