Elucidation of cellulose accessibility, hydrolysability and reactivity as the major limitations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose.

The precipitous decline in the rates of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose with conversion is one of the major limitations to the commercialization of second-generation biofuel. In this work, various rate-limiting factors (fractal kinetics, changes in crystallinity, accessibility, reactivity and hydrolysable fraction, enzyme clogging, and degree of polymerization) were investigated employing experimental as well as computational studies. Model-guided experiments showed cellulose accessibility and the hydrolysable fraction of accessible substrate (a previously undefined and unreported quantity) to decrease steadily until a conversion level of nearly 70%, while cellulose reactivity, defined in terms of hydrolytic activity per amount of actively adsorbed cellulase, remained constant. Substrate depletion, accessibility and hydrolysability decrease accounted for approximately 90% of rate retardation up to 70% conversion. Faster restart rates were observed on partially converted cellulose as compared to uninterrupted hydrolysis rates, supporting an enzyme clogging phenomenon that could possibly be responsible for the additional rate decrease.

[1]  T. Ando,et al.  Traffic Jams Reduce Hydrolytic Efficiency of Cellulase on Cellulose Surface , 2011, Science.

[2]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Biological pretreatment of cellulose: enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis rate using cellulose-binding domains from cellulases. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[3]  M. D. Teli,et al.  Effect of swelling and reactive dyeing on the accessibility of cotton to cellulase enzymes , 2011 .

[4]  Tuula T. Teeri,et al.  Crystalline cellulose degradation : new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases , 1997 .

[5]  P. Väljamäe,et al.  Processivity of Cellobiohydrolases Is Limited by the Substrate* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Göran Pettersson,et al.  Synergistic cellulose hydrolysis can be described in terms of fractal‐like kinetics , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  M. Penner,et al.  Quantitative analysis of cellulose-reducing ends , 2004, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[8]  A. Bommarius,et al.  The cellulose-binding domain of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei is also a thermostabilizing domain. , 2011, Journal of biotechnology.

[9]  I. S. Pretorius,et al.  Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[10]  L. Lynd,et al.  Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[11]  G. Caminal,et al.  Kinetic modeling of the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated cellulose , 1985, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  A family of thermostable fungal cellulases created by structure-guided recombination , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  K. Gernaey,et al.  Are Mechanistic Cellulose-Hydrolysis Models Reliable for Use in Biofuel Process Design? – Identifiability and Sensitivity Analysis , 2009 .

[14]  C. Haynes,et al.  Surface Diffusion of Cellulases and Their Isolated Binding Domains on Cellulose* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Charlotte Schubert,et al.  Can biofuels finally take center stage? , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  C. Wyman,et al.  Does change in accessibility with conversion depend on both the substrate and pretreatment technology? , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Peter Westh,et al.  A kinetic model for the burst phase of processive cellulases , 2011, The FEBS journal.

[18]  David K. Johnson,et al.  Biomass Recalcitrance: Engineering Plants and Enzymes for Biofuels Production , 2007, Science.

[19]  O. Levenspiel.  Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1972 .

[20]  Bernard Henrissat,et al.  Cellulases and their interaction with cellulose , 1994 .

[21]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[22]  G. Pettersson,et al.  The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface-erosion model. , 1998, European journal of biochemistry.

[23]  Michael E Himmel,et al.  Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance , 2010, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[24]  P. Väljamäe,et al.  Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  Andreas S Bommarius,et al.  Cellulase kinetics as a function of cellulose pretreatment. , 2008, Metabolic engineering.

[26]  L. Lynd,et al.  Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  Raoul Kopelman,et al.  Rate processes on fractals: Theory, simulations, and experiments , 1986 .

[28]  Feng Xu,et al.  A new kinetic model for heterogeneous (or spatially confined) enzymatic catalysis : Contributions from the fractal and jamming (overcrowding) effects , 2007 .

[29]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Cellulose crystallinity – a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[30]  R. Brown,et al.  Protein measurement using bicinchoninic acid: elimination of interfering substances. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[31]  A. Stipanovic,et al.  Effect of digestion by pure cellulases on crystallinity and average chain length for bacterial and microcrystalline celluloses , 2007 .

[32]  Xinhao Ye,et al.  Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[33]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.

[34]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data from cellulose: a new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[35]  T. Reinikainen,et al.  The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. , 1994, Science.