Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer

Abstract18F-Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) has been evaluated in breast cancer for the characterisation of primary tumours, lymph node staging and the follow-up of patients after surgery, chemotherapy and/or external radiotherapy. In contrast to both the low sensitivity and moderate specificity of FDG PET in the initial detection and characterisation of breast cancer and the low lesion-based sensitivity for lymph node staging, the results from use of FDG PET in re-staging breast cancer patients are very promising. A major advantage of FDG PET imaging compared with conventional imaging is that it screens the entire patient for local recurrence, lymph node metastases and distant metastases during a single whole-body examination using a single injection of activity, with a reported average sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 77%, respectively. In most studies the sensitivity of FDG PET is higher than that of a combination of conventional imaging methods. Limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer patients include the relatively low detection rate of bone metastases, especially in case of the sclerotic subtype, and the relatively high rate of false positive results. The rather low specificity of FDG PET can be improved/increased by utilising combined anatomical-molecular imaging techniques, such as a PET/CT tomograph. First results using PET/CT imaging in the follow-up of breast cancer patients demonstrate increased specificity compared with FDG PET alone. Both imaging modalities, however, offer to detect recurrent and metastatic breast cancer disease at an early stage and thus continue to demonstrate the efficacy of molecular imaging in patient management, despite the limited therapeutic options in recurrent and metastatic breast cancer.

[1]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  J L Sunshine,et al.  Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. , 1993, Radiology.

[3]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Incidence and impact of documented eradication of breast cancer axillary lymph node metastases before surgery in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[4]  R L Wahl,et al.  To AC or not to AC: that is the question. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  M. Phelps,et al.  Performance of 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose Positron Emission Tomography and Integrated PET/CT in Restaged Breast Cancer Patients , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[6]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  S. Reske,et al.  FDG-PET for clinical use , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  P F Sharp,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Greco,et al.  Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and postoperative histopathology, hormone receptor status, thymidine labelling index and p53 in primary breast cancer: a preliminary observation , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  A. Buck,et al.  Brown adipose tissue: a factor to consider in symmetrical tracer uptake in the neck and upper chest region , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Donald E. Henson,et al.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases , 1989 .

[12]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[13]  Val J Lowe,et al.  Clinical 18F-FDG oncology patient preparation techniques. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[14]  M. Phelps,et al.  Accuracy of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  M. Wyss,et al.  [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with suspected recurrence of breast cancer , 2003, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[16]  P. Mikosch,et al.  Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions. , 2003, Breast.

[17]  P. Mikosch,et al.  Tc-99m-Tetrofosmin Scintimammography: A Prospective Study in Primary Breast Lesions , 1996, Nuklearmedizin.

[18]  J. Leal,et al.  Collaboration system for radiology workstations. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  J. Czernin FDG-PET in breast cancer: a different view of its clinical usefulness. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[20]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  I. Fogelman,et al.  Skeletal metastases from breast cancer: imaging with nuclear medicine. , 1999, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[22]  B. Siegel,et al.  PET in breast cancer. , 1998, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[23]  J. Ruhlmann,et al.  Value of 18fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging of recurrent breast carcinoma. , 1997, Anticancer research.

[24]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Kei Yamada,et al.  Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Measuring [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy: comparison of analytical methods , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[27]  K R Maravilla,et al.  Value of combined FDG PET and MR imaging in the evaluation of suspected recurrent local-regional breast cancer: preliminary experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[28]  Mary I O'Connor,et al.  Diagnosis of occult bone metastases: positron emission tomography. , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  E. Mamounas Overview of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project neoadjuvant chemotherapy studies. , 1998, Seminars in oncology.

[30]  F. Jänicke,et al.  Comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and ‘conventional diagnostic procedures’ for the detection of distant metastases in breast cancer patients , 2002, Nuclear medicine communications.

[31]  Gunnar Brix,et al.  Comparison of pharmacokinetic MRI and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer: initial experience , 2001, European Radiology.

[32]  J S Karp,et al.  Design considerations for PET scanners. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[33]  J. Carreras,et al.  Early diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer with FDG-PET in patients with progressive elevation of serum tumor markers. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[34]  O. Eber,et al.  The immunoscintigraphic use of Tc‐99m‐labelled monoclonal anti‐CEA antibodies (BW 431/26) in patients with suspected primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer , 1991, International journal of cancer.

[35]  R. Wahl,et al.  Intratumoral distribution of tritiated fluorodeoxyglucose in breast carcinoma: I. Are inflammatory cells important? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  R. Wahl,et al.  Positron-emission tomographic scanning of primary and metastatic breast carcinoma with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  C J Thompson,et al.  Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  S. Nam,et al.  Comparison of intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel node with preoperative positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. , 2001, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[39]  U. Pietrzyk,et al.  Presurgical visualization of primary breast carcinoma with PET emission and transmission imaging. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  R. Wahl,et al.  Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[41]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Utility of PET in Breast Cancer. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[42]  R. Wahl,et al.  New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  S. Majewski,et al.  Positron emission mammography-guided breast biopsy. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  C J Thompson,et al.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[45]  S. Reske,et al.  FDG-PET for clinical use. Results of the 3rd German Interdisciplinary Consensus Conference, "Onko-PET III", 21 July and 19 September 2000. , 2001, European journal of nuclear medicine.

[46]  J. Graham,et al.  METABOLISM OF CANCER CELLS , 1955 .

[47]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Cancer Detection with Whole‐Body PET Using 2‐[18F]Fluoro‐2-Deoxy‐D-Glucose , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[48]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Oncological applications of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[49]  R Freifelder,et al.  Dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[50]  U. Pietrzyk,et al.  Qualitative [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in primary breast cancer: clinical relevance and practicability , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[51]  S R Cherry,et al.  Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging. , 2000, Medical physics.

[52]  Hans-Jürgen Gallowitsch,et al.  F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis of Tumor Recurrence and Metastases in the Follow-Up of Patients With Breast Carcinoma: A Comparison to Conventional Imaging , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[53]  S. Yasuda,et al.  A small breast cancer detected by PET. , 1999, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[54]  H. Herzog,et al.  Optimal scan time for fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[55]  H. Minn,et al.  [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose scintigraphy in diagnosis and follow up of treatment in advanced breast cancer , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  Mathias K. Fehr,et al.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET , 2003, European Radiology.

[57]  E. Bombardieri,et al.  PET imaging in breast cancer. , 2001, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[58]  M. Blaufox,et al.  A meta-analysis of FDG-PET for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[59]  Søren Holm,et al.  Estimation of the noise contributions from blank, transmission and emission scans in PET , 1995 .

[60]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  To enhance or not to enhance? 18F-FDG and CT contrast agents in dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[61]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Detection of locoregional and distant recurrences in breast cancer patients by using FDG PET. , 2002, Radiographics.

[62]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[63]  A. Ezzat,et al.  18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography in Inflammatory Breast Cancer , 2003, World Journal of Surgery.

[64]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  PET in clinical oncology , 1988, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[65]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Optimization of transmission and emission scan duration in 3D whole-body PET , 1996 .

[66]  J. Mulshine,et al.  Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[67]  C. Liu,et al.  Clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG-PET in patients with suspected recurrent breast cancer based on asymptomatically elevated tumor marker serum levels: a preliminary report. , 2002, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[68]  David W Townsend,et al.  PET/CT today and tomorrow. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[69]  R. Coleman,et al.  Is quantitation necessary for oncological PET studies? , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[70]  R. Rubens,et al.  Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET: differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.