Lexical retrieval: an aspect of fluent second language production that can be enhanced

The efficiency of lexical retrieval, an essential subprocess of productive language skills, is crucial in fluent writing and speaking. We examine the feasibility of an experimental computerized training for fluent lexical retrieval in the second language in a classroom setting, applying techniques previously restricted to laboratory use. Results on both a lexical decision and a written lexical retrieval task show that students in each trained-words condition have higher accuracy scores and superior reaction times on the trained words in comparison to students who were not trained on these words, with medium to large effect sizes. We discuss implications of these findings for the study of productive language skills.

[1]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[2]  J. Stevens.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[3]  Joop J. Hox,et al.  A review of current software for handling missing data , 1999 .

[4]  D. McCutchen.  Knowledge, Processing, and Working Memory: Implications for a Theory of Writing , 2000 .

[5]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[6]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  S. Krashen.  Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning , 1988 .

[8]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[9]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[10]  C. P. Whaley.  Word–nonword classification time. , 1978 .

[11]  R. Weinert.  The Role of Formulaic Language in Second Language Acquisition: A Review , 1995 .

[12]  J. Kroll,et al.  Language Production in Bilinguals , 1997 .

[13]  M. Daneman,et al.  Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context , 1986 .

[14]  J. Hayes,et al.  Fluency in Writing , 2001 .

[15]  B GrootdeA.M.,et al.  Forward and backward word translation by bilinguals , 1994 .

[16]  Deborah McCutchen,et al.  Individual Differences in Writing: Implications of Translating Fluency. , 1994 .

[17]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing a second language: Late learners''comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related b , 2001 .

[18]  Keiko Koda,et al.  L2 Word Recognition Research: A Critical Review. , 1996 .

[19]  Alison Wray,et al.  The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model , 2000 .

[20]  R. Schmidt.  Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Second Language Fluency , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[21]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[22]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[24]  Batia Laufer,et al.  The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language : Same or different ? , 1998 .

[25]  N. Segalowitz,et al.  Automatic and controlled processes in the first- and second-language reading of fluent bilinguals , 1983, Memory & cognition.