Comparing data-driven landslide susceptibility models based on participatory landslide inventory mapping in Purwosari area, Yogyakarta, Java

There are different approaches and techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. However, no agreement has been reached in both the procedure and the use of specific controlling factors employed in the landslide susceptibility mapping. Each model has its own assumption, and the result may differ from place to place. Different landslide controlling factors and the completeness of landslide inventory may also affect the different result. Incomplete landslide inventory may produce significance error in the interpretation of the relationship between landslide and controlling factor. Comparing landslide susceptibility models using complete inventory is essential in order to identify the most realistic landslide susceptibility approach applied typically in the tropical region Indonesia. Purwosari area, Java, which has total 182 landslides occurred from 1979 to 2011, was selected as study area to evaluate three data-driven landslide susceptibility models, i.e., weight of evidence, logistic regression, and artificial neural network. Landslide in the study area is usually affected by rainfall and anthropogenic activities. The landslide typology consists of shallow translational and rotational slide. The elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, stream power index, topographic wetness index, distance to river, land use, and distance to road were selected as landslide controlling factors for the analysis. Considering the accuracy and the precision evaluations, the weight of evidence represents considerably the most realistic prediction capacities (79%) when comparing with the logistic regression (72%) and artificial neural network (71%). The linear model shows more powerful result than the nonlinear models because it fits to the area where complete landslide inventory is available, the landscape is not varied, and the occurence of landslide is evenly distributed to the class of controlling factor.

[1]  Maurice G. Kendall,et al.  The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2: Inference and Relationship , 1979 .

[2]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[3]  Lee B. Lusted,et al.  Introduction to medical decision making , 1968 .

[4]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[5]  Dan Pennock,et al.  Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain , 1987 .

[6]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.

[7]  F. Agterberg,et al.  Weights of evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential , 1990 .

[8]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[9]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[10]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing , 1993, CACM.

[11]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the Central Apennines, Italy , 1998 .

[12]  C. Chung,et al.  Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping , 1999 .

[13]  R. Nagarajan,et al.  Landslide hazard susceptibility mapping based on terrain and climatic factors for tropical monsoon regions , 2000 .

[14]  S. Menard.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[15]  C. F. Lee,et al.  Landslide characteristics and, slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong , 2002 .

[16]  John C. Davis,et al.  Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA , 2003 .

[17]  R. Soeters,et al.  Use of Geomorphological Information in Indirect Landslide Susceptibility Assessment , 2003 .

[18]  Saro Lee,et al.  Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network , 2004 .

[19]  V. Doyuran,et al.  Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey , 2004 .

[20]  T. Kavzoglu,et al.  Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela , 2005 .

[21]  L. Ayalew,et al.  The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan , 2005 .

[22]  L. Ermini,et al.  Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin , 2005 .

[23]  Xu Weiya,et al.  GIS-based landslide hazard assessment: an overview , 2005 .

[24]  E. Yesilnacar,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping : A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek Region (Turkey) , 2005 .

[25]  L. Ermini,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment , 2005 .

[26]  H. A. Nefeslioglu,et al.  Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses , 2005 .

[27]  Pedro Ferreira,et al.  Interaction between geological and geotechnical investigations of a sandstone residual soil , 2005 .

[28]  M. Ercanoglu.  under a Creative Commons License. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Landslide susceptibility assessment of SE Bartin (West Black Sea , 2022 .

[29]  M. Eeckhaut,et al.  Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium) , 2006 .

[30]  Edgar Berrezueta,et al.  Landslides in the Central Coalfield (Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain): Geomorphological features, conditioning factors and methodological implications in susceptibility assessment , 2007 .

[31]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models , 2007 .

[32]  Birgit Terhorst,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights-of-evidence” applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany) , 2007 .

[33]  R. O’Brien,et al.  A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors , 2007 .

[34]  A. Nonomura,et al.  GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping , 2008 .

[35]  H. A. Nefeslioglu,et al.  An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps , 2008 .

[36]  W. Z. Savage,et al.  Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Commentary , 2008 .

[37]  Minoru Yamanaka,et al.  Predictive modelling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of-evidence , 2008 .

[38]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focussing on different training sites. , 2009 .

[39]  Isik Yilmaz,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat - Turkey) , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[40]  Y. Hong,et al.  A global landslide catalog for hazard applications: method, results, and limitations , 2010 .

[41]  M. García-Rodríguez,et al.  Assessment of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in El Salvador based on an Artificial Neural Network model , 2010 .

[42]  Netra R. Regmi,et al.  Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA , 2010 .

[43]  S. Bai,et al.  GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China , 2010 .

[44]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  R Couture.  Landslide terminology - national technical guidelines and best practices on landslides , 2011 .

[46]  Vicki G. Moon,et al.  Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale , 2012 .

[47]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping along road corridors in the Indian Himalayas using Bayesian logistic regression models , 2012 .

[48]  F. Guzzetti,et al.  Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem , 2012 .

[49]  Saro Lee,et al.  Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS , 2012 .

[50]  S. Bai,et al.  Susceptibility assessments of the Wenchuan earthquake-triggered landslides in Longnan using logistic regression , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[51]  Joachim Rohn,et al.  Landslide susceptibility analysis based on ArcGIS and Artificial Neural Network for a large catchment in Three Gorges region, China , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[52]  Y. You,et al.  Weights-of-evidence method based on GIS for assessing susceptibility to debris flows in Kangding County, Sichuan Province, China , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[53]  Kiyonobu Kasama,et al.  Generating landslide inventory by participatory mapping: an example in Purwosari Area, Yogyakarta, Java , 2015 .