Individual-motivational factors in the acceptability of demand-side and supply-side measures to reduce carbon emissions

As more than a third of all carbon dioxide emissions in the UK are generated by the domestic sector, individuals need to make drastic changes to their current lifestyle in order to play their part in climate change mitigation. Not only do they need to change their personal behaviour, they also have to accept new low-carbon technologies in order to decarbonise the energy they are using. This study uses an adapted version of the Value–Belief-Norm (VBN) model (Stern, 2000) to examine individual-motivational factors in the acceptability of demand-side and supply-side strategies to reduce carbon emissions. The study found that environmental identity, climate change concern, and personal norms are all significantly associated with the acceptability of both demand-side measures and supply-side technologies. While personal values were also important, their associations were mediated by more specific factors. Overall, the adapted VBN model was better able to explain the acceptability of low-carbon behaviours than of low-carbon energy-supply technologies. Concern about energy security appeared to be of limited importance. It was negatively associated with the willingness to engage in low-carbon behaviours, suggesting that a shift in focus towards energy security issues may not necessarily help a transition to a low-carbon society.

[1]  S. Schwartz Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[2]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[3]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[4]  A. Corner,et al.  Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes , 2011 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory , 2005 .

[7]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Environmental Problems and Human Behavior , 1995 .

[8]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior , 2004 .

[9]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole,et al.  Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications , 2007 .

[10]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[11]  S. Barr,et al.  The household energy gap: examining the divide between habitual- and purchase-related conservation behaviours , 2005 .

[12]  M. Pollitt,et al.  2010 EPRG Public Opinion Survey: Policy Preferences and Energy Saving Measures , 2011 .

[13]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted during Otober and November 2005 , 2006 .

[14]  Paul Upham,et al.  Applying environmental-behaviour concepts to renewable energy siting controversy: Reflections on a longitudinal bioenergy case study , 2009 .

[15]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[16]  A. Spence,et al.  Psychology, Climate Change & Sustainable Bahaviour , 2009 .

[17]  S. O'Neill,et al.  Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours , 2010 .

[18]  Susan Clayton,et al.  Environmental Identity: A Conceptual and an Operational Definition. , 2003 .

[19]  L. Steg,et al.  Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior , 2008 .

[20]  D. Venables,et al.  Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures in Britain Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted in January- March 2010 , 2010 .

[21]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures before and after the Fukushima accident , 2013 .

[22]  J. Garvill,et al.  Value Structures behind Proenvironmental Behavior , 2002 .

[23]  Paul Upham,et al.  Local public opinion of a proposed 21.5 MW(e) biomass gasifier in Devon: questionnaire survey results. , 2007 .

[24]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain , 2008 .

[25]  J. Garvill,et al.  Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use , 2003 .

[26]  Lynne Chester,et al.  Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit Its Polysemic Nature , 2010 .

[27]  F. Kaiser,et al.  Contrasting the Theory of Planned Behavior With the Value‐Belief‐Norm Model in Explaining Conservation Behavior1 , 2005 .

[28]  Marjaana Lindeman,et al.  Measuring Values With the Short Schwartz's Value Survey , 2005, Journal of personality assessment.

[29]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[30]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study , 2009 .

[31]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Introduction to the special issue: Place, identity and environmental behaviour , 2010 .

[32]  A. McCright,et al.  Social Movement Identity: Validating a Measure of Identification with the Environmental Movement , 2008 .

[33]  Christina Demski,et al.  Public perceptions of renewable energy technologies : challenging the notion of widespread support , 2011 .