Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial

BACKGROUND c-kit-positive, lineage-negative cardiac stem cells (CSCs) improve post-infarction left ventricular (LV) dysfunction when administered to animals. We undertook a phase 1 trial (Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic cardiOmyopathy [SCIPIO]) of autologous CSCs for the treatment of heart failure resulting from ischaemic heart disease. METHODS In stage A of the SCIPIO trial, patients with post-infarction LV dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] ≤40%) before coronary artery bypass grafting were consecutively enrolled in the treatment and control groups. In stage B, patients were randomly assigned to the treatment or control group in a 2:3 ratio by use of a computer-generated block randomisation scheme. 1 million autologous CSCs were administered by intracoronary infusion at a mean of 113 days (SE 4) after surgery; controls were not given any treatment. Although the study was open label, the echocardiographic analyses were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was short-term safety of CSCs and the secondary endpoint was efficacy. A per-protocol analysis was used. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00474461. FINDINGS This study is still in progress. 16 patients were assigned to the treatment group and seven to the control group; no CSC-related adverse effects were reported. In 14 CSC-treated patients who were analysed, LVEF increased from 30·3% (SE 1·9) before CSC infusion to 38·5% (2·8) at 4 months after infusion (p=0·001). By contrast, in seven control patients, during the corresponding time interval, LVEF did not change (30·1% [2·4] at 4 months after CABG vs 30·2% [2·5] at 8 months after CABG). Importantly, the salubrious effects of CSCs were even more pronounced at 1 year in eight patients (eg, LVEF increased by 12·3 ejection fraction units [2·1] vs baseline, p=0·0007). In the seven treated patients in whom cardiac MRI could be done, infarct size decreased from 32·6 g (6·3) by 7·8 g (1·7; 24%) at 4 months (p=0·004) and 9·8 g (3·5; 30%) at 1 year (p=0·04). INTERPRETATION These initial results in patients are very encouraging. They suggest that intracoronary infusion of autologous CSCs is effective in improving LV systolic function and reducing infarct size in patients with heart failure after myocardial infarction, and warrant further, larger, phase 2 studies. FUNDING University of Louisville Research Foundation and National Institutes of Health.

[1]  D. Torella,et al.  Adult Cardiac Stem Cells Are Multipotent and Support Myocardial Regeneration , 2003, Cell.

[2]  Scott D Flamm,et al.  A randomized study of transendocardial injection of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells and cell function analysis in ischemic heart failure (FOCUS-HF). , 2011, American heart journal.

[3]  E. Fiumana,et al.  Local Activation or Implantation of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Rescues Scarred Infarcted Myocardium Improving Cardiac Function , 2008, Circulation research.

[4]  Mark A Sussman,et al.  Enhancement of Myocardial Regeneration Through Genetic Engineering of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Expressing Pim-1 Kinase , 2009, Circulation.

[5]  G. Heusch Hibernating myocardium. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[6]  P. Lansdorp,et al.  Telomeres and Aging , 2008 .

[7]  R. Michler,et al.  Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Identifies a Pool of Human Cardiac Stem Cells With Superior Therapeutic Potential for Myocardial Regeneration , 2011, Circulation research.

[8]  A. Zeiher,et al.  Transcoronary transplantation of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  D. Torella,et al.  Cardiac stem cells delivered intravascularly traverse the vessel barrier, regenerate infarcted myocardium, and improve cardiac function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Peter A. Altman,et al.  Intramyocardial Stem Cell Injection in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Functional Recovery and Reverse Remodeling , 2011, Circulation research.

[11]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[12]  G. Daughters,et al.  Sequential studies of left ventricular function and wall motion after coronary arterial bypass surgery. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  E. Marbán,et al.  Cardiac cell therapy: where we've been, where we are, and where we should be headed. , 2011, British medical bulletin.

[14]  B. Strauer,et al.  The acute and long‐term effects of intracoronary Stem cell Transplantation in 191 patients with chronic heARt failure: the STAR‐heart study , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[15]  Vivek Muthurangu,et al.  Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  D. Torella,et al.  Stem cells in the dog heart are self-renewing, clonogenic, and multipotent and regenerate infarcted myocardium, improving cardiac function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  C. Bearzi,et al.  Human cardiac stem cells , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  J. Connell,et al.  Functionally Competent Cardiac Stem Cells Can Be Isolated From Endomyocardial Biopsies of Patients With Advanced Cardiomyopathies , 2011, Circulation research.

[19]  M. Cheitlin Adult Bone Marrow–Derived Cells for Cardiac Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2008 .

[20]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Intracoronary Administration of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Alleviates Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Rats With a 30-Day-Old Infarction , 2010, Circulation.

[21]  G. Parrinello,et al.  Long-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting procedure in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction and hibernating myocardium. , 2001, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[22]  R. Bolli,et al.  Cell therapy for ischaemic heart disease: focus on the role of resident cardiac stem cells , 2009, Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation.

[23]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[24]  R. Kim,et al.  How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[25]  S Capewell,et al.  More ‘malignant’ than cancer? Five‐year survival following a first admission for heart failure , 2001, European journal of heart failure.

[26]  P. Wernet,et al.  Regeneration of human infarcted heart muscle by intracoronary autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in chronic coronary artery disease: the IACT Study. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  M. Cheitlin Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Combined With Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Delivered Through a Graft Vessel for Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and Chronic Heart Failure: A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial , 2012 .

[28]  B. Gerber,et al.  Time course of functional recovery after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with chronic left ventricular ischemic dysfunction. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  S. Allender,et al.  Coronary heart disease statistics. , 2008 .

[30]  J. Campisi,et al.  Ageing: Balancing regeneration and cancer , 2006, Nature.