Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook

SECTION 1. Introduction 1.1 The nature of academic writing SECTION 2. The academic article 2.1 Titles 2.2 Authors 2.3. Abstracts 2.4 Key words 2.5 Introductions 2.6 Methods 2.7 Results 2.8 Discussions 2.9 Acknowledgements 2.10 References 2.11 Footnotes 2.12 Responding to referees 2.13 Proofs SECTION 3. Other genres 3.1 Books 3.2 Theses 3.3 Literature reviews 3.4 Conference papers 3.5 Tables and graphs 3.6 Posters 3.7 Book reviews 3.8 Letters to the editor 3.9 Annotated bibliographies SECTION 4. Other aspects of academic writing 4.1 Finding, keeping and disseminating information 4.2 Choosing where to publish 4.3 Delays in the publishing process 4.4 Refereeing 4.5 Sex differences 4.6 Procrastination and writer's block 4.7 Collaborative writing 4.8 Productive writers Appendices A.1 Guidelines for academic writing A.2 Guidelines for revising text A.3 Abbreviations for American States

[1]  E. Flouri Parental interest in children's education, children's self-esteem and locus of control, and later educational attainment: twenty-six year follow-up of the 1970 British Birth Cohort. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  James Hartley Writing the thesis , 1997 .

[3]  E. Garfield,et al.  Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors , 1992, Theoretical medicine.

[4]  Mike Sharples,et al.  How We Write - Writing as Creative Design , 1998 .

[5]  Ian M. Kinchin,et al.  Concept mapping, PowerPoint, and a pedagogy of access , 2006 .

[6]  Li Yang,et al.  Who will you ask? An empirical study of interpersonal task information seeking , 2006 .

[7]  James Hartley,et al.  Eighty ways of improving instructional text , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[8]  Allen S. Lee Reviewing a manuscript for publication , 1995 .

[9]  Robert Boice,et al.  Professors as Writers: A Self-Help Guide to Productive Writing , 1990 .

[10]  L. Evans Risks older drivers face themselves and threats they pose to other road users. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Donald O. Case,et al.  Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior , 2012 .

[12]  Marvin K. Bressler,et al.  Contemporary Sociology: A Quarter Century of Book Reviews , 1999 .

[13]  James Hartley,et al.  Writing through time: longitudinal studies of the effects of new technology on writing , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Brian Paltridge,et al.  Thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice , 2002 .

[15]  James Hartley,et al.  Using New Technology to Assess the Academic Writing Styles of Male and Female Pairs and Individuals , 2003 .

[16]  Joseph C. Hermanowicz What Does It Take to Be Successful? , 2006 .

[17]  Pat Thomson,et al.  Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for supervision , 2006 .

[18]  Harry T. Reis Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals: Writing Effectively about Design , 2000 .

[19]  J Hartley,et al.  Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews. , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[20]  N. Jacobs,et al.  Open access : key strategic, technical and economic aspects , 2006 .

[21]  Kerstin Severinson Eklundh,et al.  Studying Writers’ Revising Patterns with S-Notation Analysis , 2002 .

[22]  Jonathan D. Kaplan,et al.  Reviewing Grant and Contract Proposals. , 2006 .

[23]  C. R. Snyder Coping with stress : effective people and processes , 2001 .

[24]  James Hartley,et al.  Legal ease and ‘Legalese’ , 2000 .

[25]  Orhan Pamuk My Father's Suitcase , 2007, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

[26]  Nell K. Duke,et al.  Education Should Consider Alternative Formats for the Dissertation. , 1999 .

[27]  Peter Woods,et al.  Successful Writing for Qualitative Researchers , 2022 .

[28]  James Hartley,et al.  Single Authors Are Not Alone: Colleagues Often Help , 2003 .

[29]  John H. Schuh,et al.  Are the Best Higher Education Journals Really the Best? A Meta-Analysis of Writing Quality and Readability , 2001 .

[30]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Greatness: Who Makes History and Why , 1994 .

[31]  Liz Bayley,et al.  The Structured Abstract: An Essential Tool for Researchers , 2003 .

[32]  Robert A. Day How to write and publish a scientific paper , 1979 .

[33]  M. Hojat,et al.  Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process , 2003, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[34]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Enhancing Writing-Related Metacognitions Through a Computerized Writing Partner , 1991 .

[35]  R. Beard,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 1972 .

[36]  Joseph Bensman The aesthetics and politics of footnoting , 1988 .

[37]  I. Roberts,et al.  Safety education of pedestrians for injury prevention: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  J. Wilding,et al.  Life goals, approaches to study and performance in an undergraduate cohort. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[39]  Paulina Junni Students seeking information for their Master's theses: the effect of the Internet , 2007, Inf. Res..

[40]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Pygmalion in the classroom , 1968 .

[41]  Richard Andrews,et al.  THE PLACE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN EDUCATION RESEARCH , 2005 .

[42]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Writing , 1993, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[43]  Richard Horton,et al.  Postpublication criticism and the shaping of clinical knowledge. , 2002, JAMA.

[44]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative Life Cycles in Literature: Poets Versus Novelists or Conceptualists Versus Experimentalists? , 2007 .

[45]  Ruth McCorkle,et al.  From “Death Sentence” to “Good Cancer”: Couples’ Transformation of a Prostate Cancer Diagnosis , 2002, Nursing research.

[46]  F. Jansen,et al.  A note on the evaluation of footnotes and other devices for background information in popular scientific texts , 2001 .

[47]  E. Creamer,et al.  Applying the Cumulative Advantage Perspective to Scholarly Writers in Higher Education , 1998 .

[48]  Greg Myers Powerpoints: Technology, lectures, and changing genres , 2000 .

[49]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  "Getting in" revisited: an analysis of manuscript characteristics, reviewers' ratings, and acceptance of manuscripts in Psychological Bulletin. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Dale J Benos,et al.  How to review a paper. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[51]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing (2nd ed.). , 2007 .

[52]  Brewster Ghiselin,et al.  The creative process : a symposium , 1953 .

[53]  Franz Barjak,et al.  Research productivity in the internet era , 2006, Scientometrics.

[54]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[55]  Franz Barjak,et al.  The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[56]  Anthony E. Kelly,et al.  Strengthening Structured Abstracts for Education Research: The Need for Claim-Based Structured Abstracts , 2007 .

[57]  Philip C. Kendall,et al.  Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals: Introducing Your Research Report: Writing the Introduction , 2000 .

[58]  James Hartley,et al.  Refereeing and the single author , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[59]  Harry H. Crosby Titles, A Treatise On. , 1976 .

[60]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Expectations versus reality – search engine features needed for Web research at mid 2005 , 2005 .

[61]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  The Tacit Knowledge of Productive Scholars in Education. , 2004 .

[62]  H M Simpson,et al.  The safety value of driver education an training , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[63]  P. K. Murphy,et al.  Persuasion online or on paper: a new take on an old issue , 2003 .

[64]  V. L. Kalyane,et al.  Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status , 2005, Scientometrics.

[65]  Ana Marusic,et al.  Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[66]  Peter Hernon,et al.  The unsung hero to a high-quality peer review journal , 2005 .

[67]  Roxann Roberson-Nay,et al.  Constructing knowledge. The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[68]  Daniel B Wright,et al.  Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[69]  Joshua E. Susskind PowerPoint's power in the classroom: enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[70]  L B Ransdell,et al.  Factors related to publication productivity in a sample of female health educators. , 2001, American journal of health behavior.

[71]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Randomized trials versus observational studies in adolescent pregnancy prevention. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[72]  Alice Harrison Bahr,et al.  Collaborative Authorship in the Journal Literature: Perspectives for Academic Librarians Who Wish To Publish. , 2000 .

[73]  Bruce E. Trumbo,et al.  Key Words and Phrases—The Key to Scholarly Visibility and Efficiency in an Information Explosion , 1995 .

[74]  Susan M. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research on What Leads to Success in Professional Writing , 2007 .

[75]  C. Anderson An update on the effects of playing violent video games. , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[76]  M. Kieft The effects of adapting writing instruction to students writing strategies , 2006 .

[77]  Debora Shaw,et al.  A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[78]  J. S. Long,et al.  DEPARTMENTAL EFFECTS ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY , 1990 .

[79]  Helmut A. Abt,et al.  The frequencies of multinational papers in various sciences , 2007, Scientometrics.

[80]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The Scholar's Courtesy: The Role Of Acknowledgement In The Primary Communication Process , 1995 .

[81]  James Hartley,et al.  Teaching psychology students to write structured abstracts: An evaluation study , 2005, Psychology Teaching Review.

[82]  Marieke Kools Get the picture ? A cognitive-psychological approach to systematic health education materials design , 2006 .

[83]  David R. Jones,et al.  How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective , 2006 .

[84]  C. Michael Levy,et al.  The Science of Writing : Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications , 1996 .

[85]  Catherine Adams PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture , 2006 .

[86]  James Hartley,et al.  On Choosing Typographic Settings for Reference Lists , 2002 .

[87]  L G Selker,et al.  Scholarly productivity: a regional study of physical therapy faculty in schools of allied health. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[88]  David K. Farkas,et al.  Toward a better understanding of PowerPoint deck design , 2006 .

[89]  J. Willinsky The access principle: The case for open access to research , 2005 .

[90]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Workplace correlates and scholarly performance of clinical pharmacy faculty , 1992 .

[91]  Mark Torrance,et al.  The processing demands of writing , 2006 .

[92]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[93]  Jeffrey C. Valentine,et al.  Using Research to Answer Practical Questions About Homework , 2001 .

[94]  Alan D. Sokal,et al.  Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity , 1996 .

[95]  Richard Holmes Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines , 1997 .

[96]  Sven Hemlin,et al.  Research production in the arts and humanities , 1996, Scientometrics.

[97]  Leopoldo de Meis,et al.  The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity , 2006, Scientometrics.

[98]  Y. Lindholm-romantschuk Scholarly Book Reviewing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: The Flow of Ideas Within and Among Disciplines , 1998 .

[99]  Shigeaki Yamazaki,et al.  Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[100]  Paul Yates,et al.  Referees are not always right! The case of the 3-D graph , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[101]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science , 2007 .

[102]  B. Cronin,et al.  Trading cultures: Resource mobilization and service rendering in the life sciences as revealed in the journal article's paratext , 2006 .

[103]  Gunapala Edirisooriya Research Presentation in a Democratic Society: A Voice from the Audience , 1996 .

[104]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Journal Editors' Views on the Criteria a Paper Must Meet to Be Publishable , 2002 .

[105]  Bruce W Speck,et al.  Collaborative Writing: An Annotated Bibliography , 1999 .

[106]  John M. Budd,et al.  Faculty Publishing Productivity: An Institutional Analysis and Comparison with Library and Other Measures. , 1995 .

[107]  George R. Klare,et al.  A Second Look at the Validity of Readability Formulas. , 1976 .

[108]  R. Pollard,et al.  From Dissertation to Journal Article: A Useful Method for Planning and Writing Any Manuscript , 2004 .

[109]  David Kaye AIMS AND APPROACH , 1989 .

[110]  E. G. Geraerts Remembrance of things past : the cognitive psychology of remembering and forgetting trauma , 2006 .

[111]  Scott R. Hutson Self-Citation in Archaeology: Age, Gender, Prestige, and the Self , 2006 .

[112]  Kate Morss,et al.  Researching Academic Writing within a Structured Programme: Insights and outcomes , 2001 .

[113]  Beth Luey,et al.  Handbook for Academic Authors: Frontmatter , 2009 .

[114]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[115]  Barbara Kamler,et al.  Driven to abstraction: doctoral supervision and writing pedagogies , 2004 .

[116]  David J. Solomon Medical Education Online: a case study of an open access journal in health professional education , 2007, Inf. Res..

[117]  Rowena Murray,et al.  The Handbook Of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach , 2006 .

[118]  Julia Frank-McNeil,et al.  Reviewing Book Proposals. , 2006 .

[119]  R. E. Pandey,et al.  Psychology in India. , 1969 .

[120]  R. Thomson,et al.  Predicting gender from electronic discourse. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[121]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  How Do I Love Thee? Let Me Count the Words , 2006, Psychological science.

[122]  Steve Graham,et al.  Strategy Instruction and the Teaching of Writing: A Meta-Analysis. , 2006 .

[123]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States: , 1979 .

[124]  F. G. Fowler,et al.  The King's English , 1979 .

[125]  Anna Trosborg,et al.  Analysing professional genres , 2000 .

[126]  Lawrence D. Brown The Importance of Circulating and Presenting Manuscripts: Evidence from the Accounting Literature , 2005 .

[127]  J Hartley Headings in structured abstracts. , 1998, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[128]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The Hand of Science: Academic Writing and Its Rewards , 2005 .

[129]  Craig H Kennedy,et al.  Effects of a reviewer-prompting strategy on timely manuscript reviews. , 2004, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[130]  Jerry Wellington Getting Published: A Guide for Lecturers and Researchers , 2003 .

[131]  James Hartley,et al.  Gender and assessment: Differences, similarities and implications , 2007, Psychology Teaching Review.

[132]  Katarina Prpic,et al.  Gender and productivity differentials in science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[133]  Phillip A. Towndrow,et al.  Towards the ‘informed use’ of information and communication technology in education: a response to Adams’ ‘PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture’ , 2007 .

[134]  Jian Qin,et al.  Exploring the Willingness of Scholars to Accept Open Access: A Grounded Theory Approach , 2007 .

[135]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  Lost in citation: Vanishing visibility of senior authors , 2007, Scientometrics.

[136]  G W Lauth,et al.  Observation of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity (ADHD) problems in three natural classroom contexts. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[137]  Becky Francis,et al.  Writes of Passage: Stylistic features of male and female undergraduate history essays , 2002 .

[138]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlessly , 2006 .

[139]  Anthony Haynes,et al.  Writing Successful Textbooks , 2001 .

[140]  James Hartley,et al.  What do we know about footnotes? Opinions and data , 1999, J. Inf. Sci..

[141]  T. Raymond Smyth Writing in Psychology: A Student Guide , 1996 .

[142]  J. Hartley,et al.  The effects of spacing and titles on judgments of the effectiveness of structured abstracts , 2007 .

[143]  Maryanne Martin,et al.  Emotional and Cognitive Effects of Examination Proximity in Female and Male Students , 1997 .

[144]  R. Connors The rhetoric of citation systems—Part II: Competing epistemic values in citation , 1999 .

[145]  Jonathan Fine,et al.  Expository Discourse: A Genre-Based Approach to Social Science Research Texts , 2001 .

[146]  Ann Colley,et al.  Style and Content in E-Mails and Letters to Male and Female Friends , 2004 .

[147]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students , 2004 .

[148]  Carole Torgerson,et al.  A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions in adult literacy and numeracy , 2003 .

[149]  Katarina Prpic,et al.  Scientific fields and eminent scientists' productivity patterns and factors , 2005, Scientometrics.

[150]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[151]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  How Scientists Retrieve Publications: An Empirical Study of How the Internet Is Overtaking Paper Media , 2000 .

[152]  Ralph J. Burant Thanks for Your Patience , 1987 .

[153]  R. Clariana,et al.  The effects of different forms of feedback on fuzzy and verbatim memory of science principles. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[154]  James Hartley,et al.  An Evaluation of Structured Abstracts in Journals Published by the British Psychological Society , 1998 .

[155]  William R. Slomanson The Bottom Line:: Footnote Logic in Law Review Writing , 1987 .

[156]  IVAN VALIELA,et al.  The Relative Ineffectiveness of Bibliographic Search Engines , 2005 .

[157]  Melissa G. Warren Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals: Reading Reviews, Suffering Rejection, and Advocating for Your Paper , 2000 .

[158]  James Hartley,et al.  Clarity Across the Disciplines , 2004 .

[159]  Mark Ware,et al.  Online submission and peer‐review systems , 2005, Learn. Publ..

[160]  A. N. Zainab Personal, academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: a review of literature , 1999 .

[161]  Dorothea K. Thompson Arguing for Experimental “Facts” in Science , 1993 .

[162]  Catherine Scott,et al.  The Experience of Disseminating the Results of Doctoral Research , 2001 .

[163]  C. Hart Doing a literature review , 1999 .

[164]  E. O. Y. Miranda,et al.  Book Reviewing , 1946 .

[165]  Daniel Chandler,et al.  The act of writing: A media theory approach , 1995 .

[166]  James Hartley On requesting conference papers electronically , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[167]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  The missing link: journal usage metrics , 2007, Aslib Proc..

[168]  James E. Bartlett,et al.  FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION FACULTY , 2002 .

[169]  Gideon S. Mann,et al.  Bibliometric impact measures leveraging topic analysis , 2006, Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '06).

[170]  Maria A. Jankowska,et al.  Identifying University Professors' Information Needs in the Challenging Environment of Information and Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[171]  Robert J. Sternberg Writing the Psychology Paper , 1977 .

[172]  A. Grafton The Footnote: A Curious History , 2004 .

[173]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison in the social and physical sciences: An archival study. , 1983 .

[174]  Didier Carnet,et al.  Letters to the editor: Still vigorous after all these years?: A presentation of the discursive and linguistic features of the genre , 2006 .

[175]  A. Egberts,et al.  Fate of abstracts presented at five International Conferences on Pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE): 1995–1999 , 2002, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[176]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[177]  Robert Calfee Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals: What Does It All Mean? The Discussion , 2000 .

[178]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[179]  Amy E. Robillard Young Scholars Affecting Composition: A Challenge to Disciplinary Citation Practices , 2006 .

[180]  Sven Hemlin Social studies of the humanities: a case study of research conditions and performance in ancient history and classical archaeology, and English , 1996 .

[181]  V. Soler Writing Titles in Science: An Exploratory Study. , 2007 .

[182]  D. Mowery Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the “third industrial revolution” , 2008 .

[183]  James Hartley,et al.  DESIGNING INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL TEXT , 2003 .

[184]  B. Edgell The British Psychological Society. , 1947, The British journal of psychology. General section.

[185]  Peter Salovey Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals: Results That Get Results: Telling a Good Story , 2000 .

[186]  Stephen K. Donovan,et al.  The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers , 2007 .

[187]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Handbook of Writing Research , 2005 .

[188]  Joseph M. Moxley The Role of Compositionists in Creating the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations , 2003 .

[189]  George R. Klare,et al.  The measurement of readability , 1963 .

[190]  A. Weller Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses , 2001 .

[191]  S. Chandrasekhar,et al.  Scientometric Portrait of Nobel Laureate , 1996 .

[192]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  Perceptions of Clarity and Attractiveness in PowerPoint Graph Slides , 2007 .

[193]  J. Hartley,et al.  The psychologist as wordsmith: a questionnaire study of the writing strategies of productive British psychologists , 1989 .

[194]  M. F. Fox Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists , 2005 .

[195]  James Hartley,et al.  Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[196]  K. Brad Wray,et al.  Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research , 2006 .

[197]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[198]  James Hartley,et al.  What's in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons , 2005, Scientometrics.

[199]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..