Differing student views of online learning modes across two programs in an Australian university

Purpose – Aims to investigate reactions to online delivery, student perceptions of the rates and depth of participation, and levels of engagement with the learning process in a Western Australian University.Design/methodology/approach – The sample for this study comprised 108 students who were enrolled in both undergraduate and postgraduate programs. An interpretative method was adopted using a case study approach, with groups of internal and external students within one education department. This method was more appropriate than a more quantitative approach.Findings – The results indicated that, while the students were technically competent overall, issues associated with equity and access varied between the groups and also between students enrolled in the same units. The sample had also re‐conceptualised the notion of “personal” which moved beyond simple physical proximity to enable the students to create their own community of learners.Originality/value – Addresses the challenge for universities and in...

[1]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[2]  Hermine H. Marshall.  Recent and emerging theoretical frameworks for research on classroom learning : contributions and limitations , 1996 .

[3]  Mark McFadden,et al.  All That Glitters Is Not Gold: Online Delivery of Education and Training. Review of Research. , 2001 .

[4]  Linda M. Harasim.  Technology Transfer in Global Networking: Capacity Building in Africa and Latin America , 1993 .

[6]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2003 .

[7]  D. Perkins,et al.  Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[8]  Ron Omari,et al.  Using online technologies to support problem based learning: Learners' responses and perceptions , 1999 .

[9]  P. L. Adams.  THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[10]  Barry Harper,et al.  The On-Line Experience: The State of Australian On-Line Education and Training Practices. Review of Research. , 2000 .

[11]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[12]  Smita Guha,et al.  Education at the Crossroads , 2001 .

[13]  Roslin Brennan Kemmis.  All that glitters is not gold: online delivery of education and training , 2001 .

[14]  G. Salmon,et al.  Competencies for online teaching , 2001 .

[15]  L. Harasim.  Networlds: networks as social space , 1993 .

[16]  David Taylor,et al.  Student Participation and Interaction On-Line: A Case Study of Two College Classes—Freshman Writing and a Plant Science Lab , 1996 .

[17]  L. Steels,et al.  Grounding adaptive language games in robotic agents , 2006, AAAI 2012.

[18]  Mary Scarborough.  Computer mediated communication and collaborative learning in an undergraduate distance education environment , 1999 .

[19]  Sarojni Choy,et al.  Learner Expectations and Experiences: An Examination of Student Views of Support in Online Learning. , 2002 .

[20]  Reginald Nnazor.  Understanding the advent of information technology in teaching at the University: A case study of the University of British Columbia , 1998 .

[21]  William B. Borgers.  DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION. , 1919 .

[22]  Mingming Jiang.  Distance learning in a Web-based environment: An analysis of factors influencing students' perceptions of online learning , 1998 .

[23]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[24]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .