Robotic control of a traditional flexible endoscope for therapy

In therapeutic flexible endoscopy a team of physician and assistant(s) is required to control all independent translations and rotations of the flexible endoscope and its instruments. As a consequence the physician lacks valuable force feedback information on tissue interaction, communication errors easily occur, and procedures are not cost-effective. Current tools are not suitable for performing therapeutic procedures in an intuitive and user-friendly way by one person. A shift from more invasive surgical procedures that require external incisions to endoluminal procedures that use the natural body openings could be expected if enabling techniques were available. This paper describes the design and evaluation of a robotic system which interacts with traditional flexible endoscopes to perform therapeutic procedures that require advanced maneuverability. The physician uses one multi-degree-of-freedom input device to control camera steering as well as shaft manipulation of the motorized flexible endoscope, while the other hand is able to manipulate instruments. We identified critical use aspects that need to be addressed in the robotic setup. A proof-of-principle setup was built and evaluated to judge the usability of our system. Results show that robotic endoscope control increases efficiency and satisfaction. Participants valued its intuitiveness, its accuracy, the feeling of being in control, and its single-person setup. Future work will concentrate on the design of a system that is fully functional and takes safety, cleanability, and easy positioning close to the patient into account.

[1]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[2]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  An Introduction to 3-D User Interface Design , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Douglas K. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopy : principles and practice , 2009 .

[4]  Thomas Rösch,et al.  nature publishing group ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS 1075 High Cecal Intubation Rates With a New Computer- Assisted Colonoscope: A Feasibility Study , 2022 .

[5]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Bimanual coordination and interhemispheric interaction. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[6]  D. Rattner,et al.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[7]  D. Metz,et al.  Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology. , 2012, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

[8]  Roque J. Saltarén,et al.  Teleoperation of a Robot Using a Haptic Device with Different Kinematics , 2008, EuroHaptics.

[9]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[10]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Human Performance in Six Degree of Freedom Input Control , 2002 .

[11]  M. van der Voort,et al.  Design and evaluation of robotic steering of a flexible endoscope , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[12]  Ronald Mårvik,et al.  [Surgery without scars]. , 2009, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[13]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[14]  Takeshi Kuroki,et al.  Development of a novel endoscopic manipulation system: The Endoscopic operation robot. , 2011, World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  The Intuitive/sup TM/ telesurgery system: overview and application , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[16]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  An Introduction to 3D User Interface Design , 2001 .

[17]  Didier Mutter,et al.  Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. , 2007, Archives of surgery.

[18]  B. Yeung,et al.  A technical review of flexible endoscopic multitasking platforms. , 2012, International journal of surgery.

[19]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  The future of NOTES instrumentation: Flexible robotics and in vivo minirobots. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[20]  B. Dunkin,et al.  Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: current status and future possibilities , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[21]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .