Derivation of antibody distribution from experimental binding data.

Abstract It can be demonstrated that antibody populations cannot be suitably described in terms of a Sips distribution. Use of the Stieltjes transform allows instead derivation, from experimental binding data, of the most probable distribution of the association constants. From graphical interpolation of the experimental data four parameters can be obtained, which characterize a satisfactory bimodal distribution. By this procedure, analysis of data taken at different times of a humoral immune response, indicates that the relative abundance of the two sub-populations, rather than their mean association constant, is mainly affected by time or by variations of antigen dose. By use of the same procedure it is also possible to show that, at least as far as haptens are concerned, the slope of the 50% antigen-binding plot, often taken as a measure of the “avidity” of antibodies, is instead a function of the relative weight of the two sub-populations and of the spread of each of them.

[1]  R. B. Taylor A proposition on the distribution of antibody affinities, with implications for the mechanism of B-cell activation. , 1975, Immunology.

[2]  R. Petty,et al.  The antigen-binding characteristics of antibody pools of different relative affinity. , 1972, Immunology.

[3]  R. Herberg COUNTING STATISTICS FOR LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING , 1961 .

[4]  K. Landsteiner,et al.  ON CROSS REACTIONS OF IMMUNE SERA TO AZOPROTEINS , 1936, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[5]  L. Pauling,et al.  The Serological Properties of Simple Substances. VII. A Quantitative Theory of the Inhibition by Haptens of the Precipitation of Heterogeneous Antisera with Antigens, and Comparison with Experimental Results for Polyhaptenic Simple Substances and for Azoproteins , 1944 .

[6]  S. Ahlstedt,et al.  The validity of the ammonium sulphate precipitation technique of estimation of antibody amount and avidity. , 1973, Immunology.

[7]  M. Heidelberger,et al.  THE PRECIPITIN REACTION BETWEEN TYPE III PNEUMOCOCCUS POLYSACCHARIDE AND HOMOLOGOUS ANTIBODY , 1935, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  T. Werblin,et al.  Studies on the control of antibody synthesis. 3. Changes in heterogeneity of antibody affinity during the course of the immune response. , 1973, Immunology.

[9]  R. Sips,et al.  On the Structure of a Catalyst Surface , 1948 .

[10]  F. Celada,et al.  Influence of antiserum avidity on inhibition reactions. , 1974, Immunology.

[11]  V. Schirrmacher The synthesis of radioactively labeled sulfanyl‐N‐chloracetyl tyrosine and its use for determinations of quantities and affinities of anti‐p‐azobenzenesulfonate antibodies , 1972, European journal of immunology.

[12]  G W Siskind,et al.  Distribution of antibody affinities: technique of measurement. , 1972, Immunochemistry.

[13]  F. Karush The Interaction of Purified Antibody with Optically Isomeric Haptens1,2 , 1956 .

[14]  D. Pressman,et al.  Heterogeneity and average combining constants of antibodies from individual rabbits. , 1958, Journal of immunology.

[15]  H. Eisen,et al.  VARIATIONS IN AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. , 1964, Biochemistry.

[16]  W. Henley,et al.  Absent Fd antigen in gamma chain disease. , 1972, Immunochemistry.

[17]  G W Siskind,et al.  Cell selection by antigen in the immune response. , 1969, Advances in immunology.

[18]  F. Karush,et al.  Immunologic Specificity and Molecular Structure1 , 1963 .

[19]  F Aladjem,et al.  A method for the determination of heterogeneity of antibodies. , 1963, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  F. Celada,et al.  Determination of avidity of anti-albumin antibodies in the mouse. Influence of the number of cells transferred on the quality of the secondary adoptive response. , 1969, Immunology.

[21]  H. Eisen,et al.  The interaction of purified antibody with homologous hapten; antibody valence and binding constant. , 1949, Journal of the American Chemical Society.