Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile

It has been found that both preparedness for disasters and public response are significantly influenced by risk perceptions and trust in authorities and experts. Although Chile is a country with a long history of natural disasters, few studies have evaluated the risk perceptions of natural hazards or the degree of social trust. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk perception in Chile regarding various natural hazards and the degree of trust on authorities and institutions. A survey was conducted in five major cities in Chile during the year 2013 and was completed by a total sum of 2054 participants. We assessed risk perception of nine natural hazards and the level of trust in ten national institutions and authorities. According to declared levels of trust, the institutions and authorities included in this study were categorized into three groups: (1) low trust, which included governmental authorities and institutions; (2) medium trust, formed by institutions with educational and preparation roles; and (3) high trust, formed by institutions and authorities responsible for maintaining public order and conducting rescue and aid operations. Although our results show that earthquakes, tsunamis and wildfires were natural hazards of greatest concern to the national population, they also reflect that there are specific additional concerns in different cities that are coherent with their individual history of natural disasters. Implications for natural disaster risk preparedness are discussed.

[1]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Whose reality counts? Factors affecting the perception of volcanic risk , 2008 .

[3]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Anna Scolobig,et al.  The missing link between flood risk awareness and preparedness: findings from case studies in an Alpine Region , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[6]  A. Elnashai,et al.  The Maule (Chile) Earthquake of February 27, 2010: Consequence Assessment and Case Studies , 2010 .

[7]  F. Fagnani,et al.  Risk Perception and Social Acceptability of Technologies: The French Case , 1989 .

[8]  P. Slovic,et al.  A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Citizens’ Perceptions of Flood Hazard Adjustments , 2013 .

[10]  Erik Bichard,et al.  Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change? , 2012, Climatic Change.

[11]  Timothy C. Earle,et al.  Social Trust , 1995 .

[12]  Kate Burningham,et al.  'It'll never happen to me': understanding public awareness of local flood risk. , 2008, Disasters.

[13]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Flooding Risks: A Comparison of Lay People's Perceptions and Expert's Assessments in Switzerland , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: how trust influences its effectiveness , 2008 .

[16]  R. Gregory,et al.  Perceived Risk, Dread, and Benefits , 1993 .

[17]  Maaris Raudsepp,et al.  SOME SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF ENVIRONMENTALISM , 2001, Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences.

[18]  T. Arcury,et al.  Environmental Worldview in Response to Environmental Problems , 1990 .

[19]  Robert L. Funk,et al.  Coyunturas críticas de un desastre: El caso del 27F , 2011 .

[20]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[21]  Leigh M. Smith,et al.  Volcanic Hazards: Risk Perception and Preparedness , 2000 .

[22]  E. Tagle,et al.  El terremoto de 2010 en Chile: respuesta del sistema de salud y de la cooperación internacional , 2011 .

[23]  Douglas Paton,et al.  The perception of volcanic risk in Kona communities from Mauna Loa and Hualālai volcanoes, Hawai‵i , 2004 .

[24]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Global Risk Governance , 2008 .

[25]  Céline Lutoff,et al.  How to get there? Assessing motorists' flash flood risk perception on daily itineraries , 2007 .

[26]  N. Bronfman,et al.  Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources , 2012 .

[27]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[28]  Virna Vaneza Gutiérrez,et al.  Trust, acceptance and knowledge of technological and environmental hazards in Chile , 2008 .

[29]  T. Grothmann,et al.  People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others Do Not , 2006 .

[30]  Robert S. Chen,et al.  Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis , 2005 .

[31]  Ortwin Renn Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[32]  M. Siegrist The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Jan A. J. Stolwijk,et al.  Risk and Benefit Perceptions, Acceptability Judgments, and Self-Reported Actions toward Nuclear Power , 1982 .

[34]  Leroy C. Gould,et al.  Public Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Technology1 , 1989 .

[35]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Trust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  N. Bronfman,et al.  Risk Perception in a Developing Country: The Case of Chile , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[37]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[38]  M. Settanni,et al.  Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk : A study in an alpine valley in Italy , 2008 .

[39]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Credibility and trust in risk communication , 1991 .

[40]  T. Plapp U. Werner,et al.  Understanding risk perception from natural hazards: Examples from Germany , 2006 .

[41]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Understanding public attitudes to technology , 1998 .