Neural basis of semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension

According to the cue-based parsing approach (Lewis, Vasishth, & Van Dyke, 2006), sentence comprehension difficulty derives from interference from material that partially matches syntactic and semantic retrieval cues. In a 2 (low vs. high semantic interference)×2 (low vs. high syntactic interference) fMRI study, greater activation was observed in left BA44/45 for high versus low syntactic interference conditions following sentences and in left BA45/47 for high versus low semantic interference conditions following comprehension questions. A conjunction analysis showed BA45 associated with both types of interference, while BA47 was associated with only semantic interference. Greater activation was also observed in the left STG in the high interference conditions. Importantly, the results for the LIFG could not be attributed to greater working memory capacity demands for high interference conditions. The results favor a fractionation of the LIFG wherein BA45 is associated with post-retrieval selection and BA47 with controlled retrieval of semantic information.

[1]  Allison Blodgett,et al.  Understanding the Constraints on Syntactic Generation: Lexical Bias and Discourse Congruency Effects on Eye Movements , 2001 .

[2]  C. Carter,et al.  The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[3]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  B. Murdock.  A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[5]  Julie A. Van Dyke,et al.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[6]  W. Tabor,et al.  Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Recovering Meaning Left Prefrontal Cortex Guides Controlled Semantic Retrieval , 2001, Neuron.

[8]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[9]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[10]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Selection from perceptual and conceptual representations , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  David Caplan,et al.  Syntactic and Thematic Constraint Effects on Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal Correlates of Comprehension of Relative Clauses , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach. , 2003, Psychological review.

[13]  Myrna F Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism II. Production , 1980, Brain and Language.

[14]  G. Waters,et al.  The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension , 2005, Memory.

[15]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Executive control in language processing , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[16]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[17]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Jonides,et al.  Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[20]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Selecting among competing alternatives: selection and retrieval in the left inferior frontal gyrus. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  David Badre,et al.  Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Top-down signal from prefrontal cortex in executive control of memory retrieval , 1999, Nature.

[23]  W Ni,et al.  Anomaly Detection: Eye Movement Patterns , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[24]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Co-localization of Stroop and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Broca's Area: Implications for the Neural Basis of Sentence Processing , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[27]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[31]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[32]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Effective connectivity of cortical and subcortical regions during unification of sentence structure , 2010, NeuroImage.

[33]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  R. Malach,et al.  Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening , 2012, Brain and Language.

[35]  David Badre,et al.  Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[37]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[38]  A. Friederici.  The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Dissociable Controlled Retrieval and Generalized Selection Mechanisms in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[40]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[42]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Parametric effects of syntactic–semantic conflict in Broca’s area during sentence processing , 2012, Brain and Language.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event‐related f MRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Gary M. Oppenheim,et al.  The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production , 2010, Cognition.

[45]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[47]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Prominence vs. aboutness in sequencing: A functional distinction within the left inferior frontal gyrus , 2012, Brain and Language.

[48]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  LIFG-based attentional control and the resolution of lexical ambiguities in sentence context , 2011, Brain and Language.

[49]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Neural Correlates of Syntactic Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension for Low and High Span Readers , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[51]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[52]  J. A. Dyke.  Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007 .

[53]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[54]  N Makris,et al.  Location of lesions in stroke patients with deficits in syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  E. Gibson.  The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[56]  Alfred Anwander,et al.  Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[58]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[59]  Jia-Hong Gao,et al.  Is left inferior frontal gyrus a general mechanism for selection? , 2004, NeuroImage.

[60]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[62]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[63]  Jennifer M. Rodd,et al.  The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: Evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[65]  P. Hagoort.  On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .

[67]  Elizabeth A. Hirshorn,et al.  Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Readers' Eye Movements Distinguish Anomalies of Form and Content , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[69]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Unrest at rest: Default activity and spontaneous network correlations , 2007, NeuroImage.

[70]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[71]  B. McElree,et al.  Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011 .

[72]  David Caplan,et al.  Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient , 1986, Brain and Language.

[73]  David Badre,et al.  Semantic retrieval, mnemonic control, and prefrontal cortex. , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[74]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[75]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Conflict control during sentence comprehension: fMRI evidence , 2009, NeuroImage.

[76]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[77]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[78]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  The effect of semantic relatedness on syntactic analysis: An fMRI study , 2010, Brain and Language.

[79]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical Analyses of BOLD fMRI Statistics , 1997, NeuroImage.

[80]  A. Friederici.  The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[81]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[82]  B. McElree,et al.  Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. , 1998 .

[83]  Z. Ye,et al.  Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs , 2008, Brain Research.

[84]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Reflections on the neurobiology of syntax , 2009 .

[85]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[86]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[87]  Marnie E. Shaw,et al.  Default network connectivity during a working memory task , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[88]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[89]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[90]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[91]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[92]  B. McElree,et al.  Syntactic and Thematic Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence for a Temporal Dissociation , 1995 .

[93]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies , 2006, Cognition.

[94]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[95]  T. Shallice,et al.  “Sculpting the Response Space”—An Account of Left Prefrontal Activation at Encoding , 2000, NeuroImage.

[96]  K. Oberauer.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.