Statistical Analysis of Chinese Phonemic Contrast

Abstract Two phonemes that may induce minimal pairs constitute a phonemic contrast. Some phonemic contrasts may disappear for various reasons, which, nevertheless, does not seem to seriously impede linguistic communication. Does it mean that the disappeared phonemic contrasts are unimportant? In our study, we calculated the proportions (here termed degree of contrast) of minimal pairs to the words in which the two contrastive phonemes occur and explored the role of phonemic contrasts in the phonemic combinations. The degree of contrast of phonemes reflects the relation between phonemes. Our results indicate that (1) the average degree of contrast of Chinese phonemes declines exponentially with the increase in the number of syllables, rapidly approaching zero; (2) the average degree of contrast of Chinese consonants that differ from each other in only one distinctive feature and of the consonants that are absent in some Chinese dialects is significantly higher than that of other consonants; (3) the degree of contrast of Chinese consonants that differ from each other in only one distinctive feature is not significantly different from that of the consonants absent in some Chinese dialects; (4) Chinese phonemic combinations exhibit high degree of sparsity, which increases exponentially with the number of syllables and rapidly approaches 1. All these results show that the high degree of sparsity and the low degree of contrast of human languages not only leave enough room for new words, new dialects and new languages to appear but also contribute to effective and reliable communication, because a few phonemic mistakes are not likely to cause wrong decoding (sound recognition) and failed communication.

[1]  N Suga,et al.  Syntax processing by auditory cortical neurons in the FM-FM area of the mustached bat Pteronotus parnellii. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Maciej Baranowski,et al.  On the role of social factors in the loss of phonemic distinctions1 , 2013, English Language and Linguistics.

[3]  André Martinet,et al.  Economie des changements phon??tiques , 1957 .

[4]  Robert D. King,et al.  Functional Load and Sound Change , 1967 .

[5]  Henry M. Hoenigswald Language Change and Linguistic Reconstruction , 1960 .

[6]  J. Ohala Articulatory Constraints on the Cognitive Representation of Speech , 1981 .

[7]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  Phoneme inventory size and population size , 2007 .

[8]  David Carter,et al.  An information-theoretic analysis of phonetic dictionary access , 1987 .

[9]  Aren Jansen,et al.  Detection-based speech recognition with sparse point process models , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[10]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Statistical properties of Chinese phonemic networks , 2011 .

[11]  Bart de Boer,et al.  The evolution of combinatorial phonology , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[12]  A. Martinet,et al.  Remarques sur le système phonologique du français , 2000 .

[13]  San Duanmu Syllable Structure: The Limits of Variation , 2008 .

[14]  Rud S. Meyerstein Functional Load: Descriptive Limitations Alternatives of Assessment and Extensions of Application , 1970 .

[15]  P. Niyogi,et al.  Quantifying the functional load of phonemic oppositions, distinctive features, and suprasegmentals , 2006 .

[16]  Kenneth N Stevens,et al.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Aaron J. Dinkin Dialect boundaries and phonological change in upstate New York , 2009 .

[18]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[19]  C. F. Hockett A Manual of Phonology , 2013 .

[20]  D. Ingram First Language Acquisition: Method, Description and Explanation , 1989 .

[21]  Zellig S. Harris Trubetzkoy’s Grundzüge der Phonologie , 1970 .

[22]  R. Paget The Origin of Speech , 1927, Nature.

[23]  Ludger Hoffmann Grundzüge der Phonologie , 2010 .

[24]  W. Labov Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors , 1994 .

[25]  M. Teich,et al.  Fractal patterns in auditory nerve-spike trains , 1994, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[26]  Andrea Manica,et al.  The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation , 2007, Nature.

[27]  Q. Atkinson Phonemic Diversity Supports a Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa , 2011, Science.