Quality Driven Family Quality Driven Family Architecture Development Architecture Development

[1]  Eila Niemelä.  Strategies of Product Family Architecture Development , 2005, SPLC.

[2]  Anne Immonen,et al.  A tool for reliability and availability prediction , 2005, 31st EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications.

[3]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  Toward an architectural knowledge base for wireless service engineering , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[4]  A. Immonen,et al.  Evaluating the Integrability of COTS Components — Software Product Family Viewpoint , 2005 .

[5]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  Practical Evaluation of Software Product Family Architectures , 2004, SPLC.

[6]  Jan Bosch,et al.  On the Development of Software Product-Family Components , 2004, SPLC.

[7]  Mari Matinlassi.  Evaluating the portability and maintainability of software product family architecture: terminal software case study , 2004, Proceedings. Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2004).

[8]  Mari Matinlassi,et al.  Comparison of software product line architecture design methods: COPA, FAST, FORM, KobrA and QADA , 2004, Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[9]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  Tool support for traceable product evolution , 2004, Eighth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, 2004. CSMR 2004. Proceedings..

[10]  Janne Merilinna,et al.  Evaluation of UML Tools for Model-Driven Architecture , 2004 .

[11]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  Viewpoints of DSP software and service architectures , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[12]  Liliana Dobrica.  1 UML Notation Extensions for Product Line Architectures Modeling , 2004 .

[13]  Pierre America,et al.  Multi-view Variation Modeling for Scenario Analysis , 2003, PFE.

[14]  Jan Gerben Wijnstra.  Evolving a Product Family in a Changing Context , 2003, PFE.

[15]  Kari Känsälä,et al.  Software Product Family Evaluation , 2003, SPLC.

[16]  Gary J. Chastek,et al.  Exploring the Context of Product Line Adoption , 2003, PFE.

[17]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  The impact of maintainability on component-based software systems , 2003, 2003 Proceedings 29th Euromicro Conference.

[18]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  ATTRIBUTE-BASED PRODUCT-LINE ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR EMBEDDED SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[19]  Martin Verlage,et al.  The Economic Impact of Product Line Adoption and Evolution , 2002, IEEE Softw..

[20]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  A Survey on Software Architecture Analysis Methods , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[21]  Paul Clements,et al.  Software product lines - practices and patterns , 2001, SEI series in software engineering.

[22]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  Quality-driven architecture design and quality analysis method: A revolutionary initiation approach to a product line architecture , 2002 .

[23]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  Product line software engineering of embedded systems , 2001, SSR '01.

[24]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Design and use of software architectures - adopting and evolving a product-line approach , 2000 .

[25]  Robert L. Nord,et al.  Applied Software Architecture , 1999, Addison Wesley object technology series.

[26]  Liliana Dobrica,et al.  A strategy for analysing product line software architectures , 2000 .

[27]  Paul Clements,et al.  Software architecture in practice , 1999, SEI series in software engineering.

[28]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  The 4+1 View Model of Architecture , 1995, IEEE Softw..