Analysis of distributed fusion alternatives in coordinated vision agents

In this paper, we detail some technical alternatives when building a coherent distributed visual sensor network by using the multi-agent paradigm. We argue that the multi-agent paradigm fits well within the visual sensor network architecture and in this paper we specially focus on the problem of distributed data fusion. Three different data fusion coordination schemes are proposed and experimental results of passive fusion are presented and discussed. The main contributions of this paper are twofold, first we propose the use of multi-agent paradigm as the visual sensor architecture and present a real system results. Secondly, the use of feedback information in the visual sensors, called active fusion, is proposed. The experimental results prove that the multi-agent paradigm fits well within the visual sensor network and provide a novel mechanism to develop a real visual sensor network system.

[1]  Paolo Remagnino,et al.  A multi-agent framework for visual surveillance , 1999, Proceedings 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing.

[2]  F. Castanedo,et al.  Extending surveillance systems capabilities using BDI cooperative sensor agents , 2006, VSSN '06.

[3]  Stelios C. A. Thomopoulos,et al.  Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[4]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Intelligent agents: theory and practice The Knowledge Engineering Review , 1995 .

[5]  Bayesian network model for data incest in a distributed sensor network , 2004 .

[6]  Reid G. Smith,et al.  The Contract Net Protocol: High-Level Communication and Control in a Distributed Problem Solver , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[7]  Alois Knoll,et al.  A Multi-Agent System Architecture for Distributed Computer Vision , 2000, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[8]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Covariance consistency methods for fault-tolerant distributed data fusion , 2003, Inf. Fusion.

[9]  Davide Ancona,et al.  Languages for Programming BDI-style Agents: an Overview , 2005, WOA.

[10]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Intelligent agents: theory and practice , 1995, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[11]  Samuel McLaughlin,et al.  Managing data incest in a distributed sensor network , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03)..

[12]  Rui J. Lopes,et al.  Inter-agent communication in a FIPA compliant intelligent distributed dynamic-information system , 1999 .

[13]  Winfried Lamersdorf,et al.  Jadex: Implementing a BDI-Infrastructure for JADE Agents , 2003 .

[14]  V. Berge-Cherfaoui,et al.  A multi-agent approach of the multi-sensor fusion , 1991, Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics 'Robots in Unstructured Environments.

[15]  Qiuming Zhu,et al.  Hierarchical Collective Agent Network (HCAN) for efficient fusion and management of multiple networked sensors , 2007, Inf. Fusion.

[16]  Hairong Qi,et al.  Mobile-agent-based collaborative sensor fusion , 2008, Inf. Fusion.

[17]  Vikram Krishnamurthy,et al.  Data incest removal in a survivable estimation fusion architecture , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[18]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Robust data fusion in a visual sensor multi-agent architecture , 2007, 2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[19]  James Llinas,et al.  Multisensor Data Fusion , 1990 .

[20]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  A non-divergent estimation algorithm in the presence of unknown correlations , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).