Team Dynamics: A Social Network Perspective

Research has consistently revealed that team cohesion is positively related to team performance under certain conditions. In response to the need for understanding this relationship more fully, and because of the promising new insights that can be garnered with the use of social network analysis (SNA), this study employs SNA as a tool to explore a case study of the structural cohesiveness of two women’s collegiate basketball teams. Members of the two teams completed online roster-based surveys related to different types of structural cohesion levels at four points during the season. This case study revealed that the higher performing team showed improved structural cohesion in the efficacy network over the four phases, and highlighted the movement of key players in the different networks (friendship, trust, advice, and efficacy) over time. These patterns demonstrate the potential for SNA to function as a diagnostic tool for organizations and researchers to generate testable hypotheses even in instances wh...

[1]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  The Social Construction of Knowledge in the Field of Sport Management: A Social Network Perspective , 2008 .

[2]  Kevin S. Spink,et al.  Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. , 1990 .

[3]  R. Burt.  Models of Network Structure , 1980 .

[4]  P. Sarrazin,et al.  The Relationships of Perceived Motivational Climate to Cohesion and Collective Efficacy in Elite Female Teams , 2006 .

[5]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[6]  K. Dirks.  Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[8]  A. Carrón,et al.  Cohesion and performance in sport: a meta analysis. , 2002 .

[9]  S. White.  The Relationship between Psychological Skills, Experience, and Practice Commitment among Collegiate Male and Female Skiers , 1993 .

[10]  M. Dixon,et al.  Hiring Internal Employees: A View from the Field , 2006 .

[11]  Mike Voight,et al.  A team building intervention program: application and evaluation with two university soccer teams. , 2001 .

[12]  W. Widmeyer,et al.  Predicting Cohesion in a Coacting Sport , 1991 .

[13]  F. Bailey,et al.  Stratagems And Spoils: A Social Anthropology Of Politics , 1969 .

[14]  William L. Hays,et al.  Theory Testing in Organizational Behavior: The Varient Approach. , 1985 .

[15]  D. Harrison,et al.  TIES, LEADERS, AND TIME IN TEAMS: STRONG INFERENCE ABOUT NETWORK STRUCTURE'S EFFECTS ON TEAM VIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[16]  D. Feltz,et al.  Individual and Crew Level Determinants of Collective Efficacy in Rowing , 2004 .

[17]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Social Networks and Organizations , 2012 .

[18]  Jean-Philippe Heuzé,et al.  Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  M. Pickens.  Game location as a determinant of team performance in ACC basketball during 1990-1991. , 1994 .

[20]  Kurt T. Dirks,et al.  The Relationship Between Being Perceived as Trustworthy by Coworkers and Individual Performance† , 2009 .

[21]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[22]  K. Spink.  Cohesion and Intention to Participate of Female Sport Team Athletes , 1995 .

[23]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Cohesiveness as a Factor in Sport Performance , 1981 .

[24]  K. Dion.  Group cohesion: From "field of forces" to multidimensional construct. , 2000 .

[25]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[26]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[27]  S. Carless,et al.  The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams , 2000 .

[28]  A. Carrón,et al.  Assessing the Cohesion of Teams: Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire , 1987 .

[29]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Social network theory and analysis: a complementary lens for inquiry. , 2008 .

[30]  J. A. Peterson,et al.  Group Cohesiveness as a Determinant of Success and Member Satisfaction in Team Performance , 1971 .

[31]  A. Carrón,et al.  The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire , 1985 .

[32]  Garry Whannel,et al.  Media Sport Stars: Masculinities and Moralities , 2001 .

[33]  W. Widmeyer,et al.  The Cohesion-Performance Outcome Relationship In a Coactlng Sport , 1991 .

[34]  C. Schriesheim,et al.  Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. , 1999 .