Surface reflectance characterization by statistical tools

The classification of surface reflectance functions as diffuse, specular, and glossy has been introduced by Heckbert more than two decades ago. Many rendering algorithms are dependent on such a classification, as different kinds of light transport will be handled by specialized methods, for example, caustics require specular bounce or refraction. As the surface reflectance models are more and more rich and descriptive including those based on measured data, it has not been possible to keep such a characterization simple. Each surface reflectance model is mostly handled separately, or alternatively, the rendering algorithm restricts itself to the use of some subset of reflectance models. We provide a general characterization for arbitrary surface reflectance representation by means of statistical tools. We demonstrate by rendered images using Matusik's BRDF data sets for two environment maps and two 3D objects (sphere and Utah teapot) that there is even a visible perceptual correspondence to the proposed surface reflectance characterization, when we use monochromatic surface reflectance and the albedo is normalized for rendering images to equalize perceived brightness. The proposed characterization is intended to be used to optimize rendering algorithms.

[1]  Michael A. Marciniak,et al.  Comparison of several surfaces for use as a MWIR BRDF standard , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[2]  E. Adelson,et al.  Recognition of Surface Reflectance Properties from a Single Image under Unknown Real-World Illumination , 2001 .

[3]  James T. Kajiya,et al.  The rendering equation , 1986, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Pieter Peers,et al.  Estimating Specular Roughness and Anisotropy from Second Order Spherical Gradient Illumination , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[5]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  Optimal combination of techniques in multiple importance sampling , 2014, VRCAI '14.

[6]  Alexander Wilkie,et al.  Arbitrarily layered micro-facet surfaces , 2007, GRAPHITE '07.

[7]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[8]  Wojciech Matusik,et al.  A data-driven reflectance model , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[9]  Paul S. Heckbert Adaptive radiosity textures for bidirectional ray tracing , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  H. Jensen Realistic Image Synthesis Using Photon Mapping , 2001 .

[11]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Experimental analysis of BRDF models , 2005, EGSR '05.

[12]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[13]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Optimally combining sampling techniques for Monte Carlo rendering , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  Pierre Poulin,et al.  Representativity for Robust and Adaptive Multiple Importance Sampling , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 1981 .

[16]  Holly E. Rushmeier,et al.  A Sparse Parametric Mixture Model for BTF Compression, Editing and Rendering , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[17]  Alexander Keller,et al.  Progressive Point‐Light‐Based Global Illumination , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[18]  Brian G Hoover,et al.  Coherence solution for bidirectional reflectance distributions of surfaces with wavelength-scale statistics. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[20]  Adam Arbree,et al.  Scalable Realistic Rendering with Many‐Light Methods , 2014, Eurographics.

[21]  Mark Colbert,et al.  Importance Sampling for Production Rendering , 2010 .

[22]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Robust Monte Carlo methods for light transport simulation , 1997 .

[23]  Eric P. Lafortune,et al.  Using the modified Phong reflectance model for physically based rendering , 1994 .

[24]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Estimating surface reflectance properties from images under unknown illumination , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[25]  Peter Vangorp,et al.  Human Visual Perception of Materials in Realistic Computer Graphics , 2009 .

[26]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Non-linear approximation of reflectance functions , 1997, SIGGRAPH.