Nano-mupirocin: enabling the parenteral activity of mupirocin

Abstract Mupirocin is an antibiotic having a unique mode of action, not shared by any other therapeutically available antibiotic. However, due to its rapid elimination following injection and high protein binding, current therapeutic use is limited to topical administration. Computational methods have identified mupirocin as a good candidate for delivery via long-circulating nano-liposomes. Formulating mupirocin in such liposomes to form Nano-mupirocin protects the drug in the circulation, enabling therapeutic efficacy. This was demonstrated using two different animal models that served as a proof of concept: the mice necrotizing fasciitis and rabbit endocarditis models. In both animal models, mupirocin administered intravenously (IV) lacked therapeutic efficacy, while the Nano-mupirocin administered IV was efficacious. In both mice and rabbits the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile following IV injection of Nano-mupirocin showed significantly greater AUC and elimination half-life of Nano-mupirocin compared to the free drug. In addition, in mice we also demonstrated significant drug distribution into the disease site. These PK profiles may explain Nano-mupirocin’s superior therapeutic efficacy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that systemic activity of mupirocin is feasible. Therefore, Nano-mupirocin can be considered a novel and unique parenteral antibiotic candidate drug.

[1]  Yechezkel Barenholz,et al.  Amphipathic weak acid glucocorticoid prodrugs remote-loaded into sterically stabilized nanoliposomes evaluated in arthritic rats and in a Beagle dog: a novel approach to treating autoimmune arthritis. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  K. Bayles,et al.  Impact of vancomycin on sarA-mediated biofilm formation: role in persistent endovascular infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. , 2014, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  Alexander Golbraikh,et al.  Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of remote liposome loading of drugs. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[4]  E. Azzopardi,et al.  The enhanced permeability retention effect: a new paradigm for drug targeting in infection. , 2013, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[5]  V. Nizet,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group , 2022 .

[6]  Yechezkel Barenholz,et al.  Liposome application: problems and prospects , 2001 .

[7]  S. Clerc,et al.  Loading of amphipathic weak acids into liposomes in response to transmembrane calcium acetate gradients. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Reporting of Pregnancy Success Rates From Assisted Reproductive Technology Programs , 2016 .

[9]  J. Hughes,et al.  Interaction of pseudomonic acid A with Escherichia coli B isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1980, The Biochemical journal.

[10]  Y. Barenholz Doxil®--the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[11]  N. Düzgüneş,et al.  Liposome-encapsulated antibiotics. , 2005, Methods in Enzymology.

[12]  A. Bayer,et al.  Comparative Efficacies of Liposomal Amikacin (MiKasome) plus Oxacillin versus Conventional Amikacin plus Oxacillin in Experimental Endocarditis Induced by Staphylococcus aureus: Microbiological and Echocardiographic Analyses , 1999, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  Yechezkel Barenholz,et al.  Relevancy of Drug Loading to Liposomal Formulation Therapeutic Efficacy , 2003, Journal of liposome research.

[14]  A. Goldblum,et al.  Effect of solubilizing agents on mupirocin loading into and release from PEGylated nanoliposomes. , 2014, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[15]  R. Schiffelers,et al.  In vivo synergistic interaction of liposome-coencapsulated gentamicin and ceftazidime. , 2001, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[16]  K A Pappa,et al.  The clinical development of mupirocin. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[17]  Yechezkel Barenholz,et al.  Fabrication Principles and Their Contribution to the Superior In Vivo Therapeutic Efficacy of Nano-Liposomes Remote Loaded with Glucocorticoids , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  Amiram Goldblum,et al.  Liposome drugs' loading efficiency: a working model based on loading conditions and drug's physicochemical properties. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[19]  Y. Barenholz,et al.  Separation of liposome-associated doxorubicin from non-liposome-associated doxorubicin in human plasma: implications for pharmacokinetic studies. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  Y. Barenholz,et al.  Optimization and upscaling of doxorubicin-containing liposomes for clinical use. , 1990, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[21]  Amiram Goldblum,et al.  Computer-aided design of liposomal drugs: In silico prediction and experimental validation of drug candidates for liposomal remote loading. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[22]  S. Al-suwayeh,et al.  Treatment of experimental osteomyelitis by liposomal antibiotics. , 2004, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[23]  R. Pandey,et al.  Chemotherapeutic activity against murine tuberculosis of once weekly administered drugs (isoniazid and rifampicin) encapsulated in liposomes. , 2002, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[24]  Jing Wang,et al.  Polymyxin E sulfate-loaded liposome for intravenous use: preparation, lyophilization, and toxicity assessment in vivo. , 2009, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.

[25]  K. Barrow,et al.  Pseudomonic Acid: an Antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens , 1971, Nature.

[26]  R. Boon,et al.  Antibacterial activity of mupirocin (pseudomonic acid), a new antibiotic for topical use , 1985, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.