Cohesion Policy Funds and local government autonomy: Evidence from Italian municipalities

[1]  Valeria Bucci,et al.  Local government spending efficiency and fiscal decentralization: evidence from Italian municipalities , 2023, Applied Economics.

[2]  J. Bachtler,et al.  The quality of government and administrative performance: explaining Cohesion Policy compliance, absorption and achievements across EU regions , 2022, Regional Studies.

[3]  U. Fratesi,et al.  One policy, different effects: Estimating the region‐specific impacts of EU cohesion policy , 2021, Journal of Regional Science.

[4]  Jan P. Vogler,et al.  Does EU funding improve local state capacity? Evidence from Polish municipalities , 2021, European Union Politics.

[5]  E. López‐Bazo.  The Impact of Cohesion Policy on Regional Differences in Support for the European Union* , 2021 .

[6]  Guido Blasio,et al.  Does EU regional policy promote local TFP growth? Evidence from the Italian Mezzogiorno , 2020 .

[7]  R. Crescenzi,et al.  It’s not about the money. EU funds, local opportunities, and Euroscepticism , 2020, Regional Science and Urban Economics.

[8]  P. Liberati,et al.  Does redistribution matter? The decomposition of the fiscal residuum in Italian regions , 2020, Regional Studies.

[9]  Armando Rungi,et al.  Cohesion Policy Meets Heterogeneous Firms , 2019, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.

[10]  Leonardo Madio,et al.  Light cannabis and organized crime: Evidence from (unintended) liberalization in Italy , 2018, European Economic Review.

[11]  L. Forni,et al.  Fiscal Rules to Tame the Political Budget Cycle: Evidence from Italian Municipalities , 2017, European Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  F. Porcelli,et al.  Political Competition, Tax Salience and Accountability: Theory and Some Evidence from Italy , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  R. Lagravinese,et al.  The growth and variability of regional taxes: an application to Italy , 2018 .

[14]  A. Alesina,et al.  Old and Young Politicians , 2015, Economica.

[15]  C. D. Bo.  Fiscal Autonomy and EU Structural Funds The Case of the Italian Regional Income Tax System , 2018 .

[16]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Effects of EU Regional Policy: 1989-2013 , 2017 .

[17]  H. Baldersheim,et al.  Measuring Local Autonomy in 39 Countries (1990–2014) , 2016 .

[18]  Gabriel Katz,et al.  State Capacity and Long�?Run Economic Performance , 2016 .

[19]  S. Greco,et al.  Stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis (SMAA): an application to the ranking of Italian regions , 2018 .

[20]  Emanuele Ciani,et al.  European structural funds during the crisis: evidence from Southern Italy , 2015 .

[21]  Santiago Lago-Peñas,et al.  The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey , 2015 .

[22]  G. Resce,et al.  Public Sector Contribution To Competitiveness , 2015 .

[23]  F. Porcelli,et al.  Intergovernmental Grants as Signals and the Alignment Effect: Theory and Evidence , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  Mara Giua.  Spatial Discontinuity for the Impact Assessment of the EU Regional Policy: The Case of Italian Objective 1 Regions , 2014 .

[25]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and the Growth and Investment Effects of Regional Transfers: A Regression Discontinuity Design with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects , 2013 .

[26]  N. Gemmell,et al.  Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: Spending Versus Revenue Decentralization , 2013 .

[27]  Ornella Tarola,et al.  Measuring the effects of European Regional Policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach , 2013 .

[28]  T. Nannicini,et al.  Tying Your Enemy's Hands in Close Races: The Politics of Federal Transfers in Brazil , 2012, American Political Science Review.

[29]  M. Storper,et al.  Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions , 2011 .

[30]  Philipp Mohl,et al.  Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches☆ , 2010 .

[31]  Patrick M. Kline,et al.  Place Based Policies, Heterogeneity, and Agglomeration , 2010 .

[32]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  In Economics and Social Sciences Working Papers Series Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe , 2022 .

[33]  Barry R. Weingast.  Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives , 2009 .

[34]  P. Mohl,et al.  Econometric Evaluation of EU Cohesion Policy – A Survey , 2009 .

[35]  Christian Hansen,et al.  Generalized least squares inference in panel and multilevel models with serial correlation and fixed effects , 2007 .

[36]  Gary King,et al.  Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference , 2007, Political Analysis.

[37]  R. Martin,et al.  Evaluating the impact of the structural funds on objective 1 regions: An exploratory discussion , 2006 .

[38]  I. Barankay,et al.  Decentralization and the Productive Efficiency of Government: Evidence from Swiss Cantons , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[39]  Jonathan Rodden.  Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement , 2004 .

[40]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions , 2004 .

[41]  D. Rubin.  Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation , 2001, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[42]  Robin Boadway.  The Theory and Practice of Equalization , 2004 .

[43]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[44]  Stephan Haggard,et al.  Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases , 2001 .

[45]  Ben Lockwood.  Inter-regional insurance , 1999 .

[46]  A. Case,et al.  Unnatural Experiments? Estimating the Incidence of Endogenous Policies , 1994 .

[47]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Does centralization increase the size of government , 1994 .

[48]  David Card,et al.  Using Regional Variation in Wages to Measure the Effects of the Federal Minimum Wage , 1992 .

[49]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[50]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[51]  D. Rubin.  Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies , 1973 .

[52]  Charles M. Tiebout.  A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.