Integrating novel dimensions to eliminate category exceptions: when more is less.

Category learning can be characterized as a process of discovering the dimensions that represent stimuli efficiently and effectively. Categories that are overlapping when represented in 1 dimensionality may be separate in a higher dimensional cue set. The authors report 2 experiments in which participants were shown an additional cue after learning to use 2 imperfect cues. The results revealed that participants can integrate new information into their categorization cue set. The authors discovered wide individual differences, however, with many participants favoring simpler, but less accurate, cue sets. Some participants demonstrated the ability to discard information previously used when new, more accurate information was introduced. The categorization model RASHNL (J. K. Kruschke & M. K. Johansen, 1999) gave qualitatively accurate fits of the data.

[1]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Extrapolation: the sine qua non for abstraction in function learning. , 1997 .

[3]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Competing strategies in categorization : Expediency and resistance to knowledge restructuring , 2000 .

[4]  A. Williams,et al.  Visual search strategies in experienced and inexperienced soccer players. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[5]  Mark Blair,et al.  As easy to memorize as they are to classify: The 5–4 categories and the category advantage , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[6]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  A rule-plus-exception model for classifying objects in continuous-dimension spaces , 1998 .

[7]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Learning to Perceive While Perceiving to Learn , 2003 .

[9]  R M Nosofsky,et al.  Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[11]  Nathaniel J. Blair,et al.  Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  J. Boster,et al.  Form or Function: A Comparison of Expert and Novice Judgments of Similarity Among Fish , 1989 .

[13]  Gregg E.A. Solomon,et al.  Conceptual Change and Wine Expertise , 1997 .

[14]  I. Biederman,et al.  Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. , 1987 .

[15]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Simon P. Davies,et al.  Knowledge restructuring and the acquisition of programming expertise , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  J. Kruschke,et al.  A model of probabilistic category learning. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  D. Medin,et al.  Categorization and Reasoning among Tree Experts: Do All Roads Lead to Rome? , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  J. Feldman.  The Simplicity Principle in Human Concept Learning , 2003 .

[20]  D. Medin,et al.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. , 2004, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Kruschke.  Base rates in category learning. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual organization in vision : behavioral and neural perspectives , 2003 .

[24]  A. Williams,et al.  Visual search strategy, selective attention, and expertise in soccer. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[25]  D. Medin,et al.  Tall is typical: Central tendency, ideal dimensions, and graded category structure among tree experts and novices , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Unitization during category learning , 2000 .

[27]  D. Homa,et al.  Expanding the search for a linear separability constraint on category learning , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[29]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Categorization Under Complexity: A Unified MDL Account of Human Learning of Regular and Irregular Categories , 2002, NIPS.

[30]  P. Schyns,et al.  Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .

[31]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology , 1997 .

[33]  J. Kruschke.  Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning , 2001 .