The Role of Integrated Assessment Models in Climate Policy: A User's Guide and Assessment

This paper considers the role of integrated assessment models (IAMs) in the construction of climate policy. We focus on questions involving the role of IAMs in estimating the social cost of carbon (SCC), how best to handle the considerable scientific uncertainty underlying the IAMs from the perspective of judgement or another substitute. The perspective we adopt in tackling these questions is rooted in the specific needs of the existing U.S. institutions responsible for making and implementing climate policy, specifically regulatory agencies within the Executive Branch and Congress should it choose to take up climate legislation. Our discussion has three premises. First, policy makers need a numerical value and an uncertainty range for the SCC for policy evaluation and implementation. Second, whatever the true value of the SCC is, it is not zero. Third, considerable uncertainty surrounds the current state of scientific knowledge about the current and future costs of climate change. The evolving nature of the science and the ultimate goal of informing first-best policy suggests to us that the official SCC-the SCC used for regulatory analysis by the U.S. government--should not be thought of as a single number or even a range of numbers, but more broadly as a process that yields updated estimates of those numbers and ranges. Viewed in this way, the ultimate goal of the process is scientific credibility, public acceptance, and political and legal viability.

[1]  R. Pindyck.  Fat Tails, Thin Tails, and Climate Change Policy , 2010, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[2]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  The Economics of Tail Events with an Application to Climate Change , 2011, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[3]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century , 2012 .

[4]  J. Melillo,et al.  Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol , 1999, Nature.

[5]  Stephen C. Newbold,et al.  Climate Response Uncertainty and the Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions , 2009 .

[6]  R. Pindyck.  Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us? , 2013 .

[7]  Antony Millner,et al.  On Welfare Frameworks and Catastrophic Climate Risks , 2011 .

[8]  Ian W. H. Parry,et al.  Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling , 1995 .

[9]  K. Arrow,et al.  Determining Benefits and Costs for Future Generations , 2013, Science.

[10]  M. Auffhammer.  Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use , 2011, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[11]  R. Barro,et al.  Environmental Protection, Rare Disasters and Discount Rates , 2013 .

[12]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[13]  Shi-Ling Hsu.  The Case for a Carbon Tax , 2013 .

[14]  R. Tol.  The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes , 2008 .

[15]  Thomas S. Lontzek,et al.  The Social Cost of Stochastic and Irreversible Climate Change , 2013 .

[16]  Marc P. Giannoni,et al.  DOES MODEL UNCERTAINTY JUSTIFY CAUTION? ROBUST OPTIMAL MONETARY POLICY IN A FORWARD-LOOKING MODEL , 2002, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[17]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy Literature , 2013 .

[18]  M. Weitzman.  Prices vs. Quantities , 1974 .

[19]  W. Nordhaus,et al.  Integrated Economic and Climate Modeling , 2011 .

[20]  Martin L. Weitzman,et al.  Fat-Tailed Uncertainty in the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change , 2011, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[21]  Solomon Hsiang,et al.  Does the Environment Still Matter? Daily Temperature and Income in the United States , 2014 .

[22]  M. Weitzman.  Fat Tails and the Social Cost of Carbon , 2014 .

[23]  M. Greenstone,et al.  Developing a Social Cost of Carbon for US Regulatory Analysis: A Methodology and Interpretation , 2013, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[24]  P. Wilcoxen,et al.  Double Dividend: Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States , 2013 .

[25]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Comparing Greenhouse Gases for Policy Purposes , 1993 .

[26]  Michael Greenstone,et al.  Using and improving the social cost of carbon , 2014, Science.

[27]  B. Scheuchl,et al.  Widespread, rapid grounding line retreat of Pine Island, Thwaites, Smith, and Kohler glaciers, West Antarctica, from 1992 to 2011 , 2014 .

[28]  its Impacts,et al.  Abrupt Impacts of Climate Change: Anticipating Surprises , 2014 .

[29]  R. Mooij,et al.  Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation. , 1994 .

[30]  Raymond T. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Warming the world , 2004, Nature.

[31]  M. Weitzman.  Book Review—A Review of William Nordhaus' The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World , 2015, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[32]  A. C. Pigou.  Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[33]  Stefano Giglio,et al.  Very Long-Run Discount Rates , 2014 .

[34]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  A Proposal for a U.S. Carbon Tax Swap: An Equitable Tax Reform to Address Global Climate Change , 2007 .

[35]  W. Nordhaus.  The Climate Casino , 2017 .

[36]  B. Smith,et al.  Marine Ice Sheet Collapse Potentially Under Way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West Antarctica , 2014, Science.

[37]  R. Stavins,et al.  PROPOSAL FOR A U.S. CAP-AND-TRADE SYSTEM TO ADDRESS GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE: , 2007 .

[38]  Lars Peter Hansen,et al.  Recursive Robust Estimation and Control Without Commitment , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[39]  P. Ramchandani,et al.  A question of balance , 2004, Nature.

[40]  W. Nordhaus.  Economic Policy in the Face of Severe Tail Events , 2012 .

[41]  William C. Brainard.  Uncertainty and the effectiveness of policy , 1967 .

[42]  Christopher E. Clarke.  A Question of Balance , 2008 .

[43]  M. Weitzman,et al.  On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.