Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives: is there a mismatch between objectives and results?

The objectives of open government data initiatives range from enhancing transparency and accountability to increasing innovation and participation. However, there is a lack of knowledge of the extent to which the objectives of open government data initiatives are achieved. This article investigates the relationship between the objectives of open government data initiatives and the benefits delivered. A total of 168 survey responses concerning 156 open government data initiatives at different government levels worldwide suggest that operational and technical benefits are the benefits most often delivered, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits. Surprisingly, our study suggests that whether an open government data initiative delivers a benefit (e.g. increased openness, trust or innovation) is not significantly affected by having an objective related to the delivery of that benefit. The objectives of state- and national-level open government data initiatives are more often achieved than those of local- and regional-level open government data initiatives. Points for practitioners Key implications for professionals working in public management and administration are: attaining open government data objectives is easier said than done; the benefits delivered are most often operational and technical benefits, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits; the benefits are often in areas other than those of the open government data initiative’s objectives, suggesting a mismatch between the objectives and their attainment; state- and national-level open government data initiatives achieve their objectives more often than local- and regional-level open government data initiatives; and initiatives might mimic each other instead of aiming at delivering the benefits.

[1]  Angus Whyte,et al.  Analysis and Evaluation of E-Consultations , 2002 .

[2]  Felix Mödritscher,et al.  And Data for All: On the Validity and Usefulness of Open Government Data , 2013, i-Know '13.

[3]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Building Understanding of Smart City Initiatives , 2012, EGOV.

[4]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Open data movement in Greece: a case study on open government data sources , 2013, PCI '13.

[5]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda , 2016, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[7]  N. Huijboom,et al.  Open data: An International comparison of strategies , 2011 .

[8]  Evangelos Kalampokis,et al.  Combining Social and Government Open Data for Participatory Decision-Making , 2011, ePart.

[9]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  B. Obama Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Open Data Policy--Managing Information as an Asset , 2013 .

[11]  Oscar Corcho,et al.  Methodological Guidelines for Publishing Government Linked Data , 2011 .

[12]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  The Sustainable Value of Open Government Data , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti,et al.  Exploring the economic value of open government data , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan,et al.  Open Government Success Factors in Government Websites: The Mexican Experience , 2013 .

[15]  Michael Gurstein,et al.  Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? , 2011, First Monday.

[16]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  The Transparency President? The Obama Administration and Open Government , 2009 .

[17]  A. M. Evans,et al.  Open Government Initiatives: Challenges of Citizen Participation , 2013 .

[18]  Sören Auer,et al.  Data Driven Governments: Creating Value Through Open Government Data , 2016, Trans. Large Scale Data Knowl. Centered Syst..

[19]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[20]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective , 2011, dg.o '11.

[21]  Emma Nangle,et al.  Re-use of Public Sector Information , 2016, Essential Law for Information Professionals.

[22]  Gillian Oliver,et al.  Value in the MASH: Exploring the Benefits, Barriers and Enablers of Open Data Apps , 2020, ECIS.

[23]  Barbara Ubaldi,et al.  Open Government Data , 2019, Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020.

[24]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[25]  Sören Auer,et al.  A systematic review of open government data initiatives , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  The Generative Mechanisms Of Open Government Data , 2013, ECIS.

[27]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Frederika Welle Donker,et al.  Open Data and Beyond , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[29]  Tim Davies,et al.  Open Data Barometer: 2013 Global Report , 2013 .

[30]  J. Wareham,et al.  A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona , 2012, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[31]  M. Bolívar,et al.  Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance , 2016 .

[32]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[33]  Ben Worthy,et al.  More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government , 2010 .

[34]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  M. Hillebrandt,et al.  Open government: connecting vision and voice , 2012 .

[36]  Jo Bates,et al.  "This is what modern deregulation looks like" : co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK's Open Government Data Initiative , 2012, J. Community Informatics.

[37]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[38]  Anneke Zuiderwijk,et al.  Open data infrastructures: The design of an infrastructure to enhance the coordination of open data use , 2015 .

[39]  Nigel Shadbolt Open Government Data , 2012 .

[40]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Culture , Leadership , and Organizations : The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies , 2022 .

[41]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda , 2012, Future Internet.

[42]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  Carina Veeckman,et al.  The City as Living Laboratory: Empowering Citizens with the Citadel Toolkit , 2015 .

[44]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[45]  Paulo S. C. Alencar,et al.  Adapting to Climate Change - An Open Data Platform for Cumulative Environmental Analysis and Management , 2015, ICCSA.

[46]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Benchmarks for Evaluating the Progress of Open Data Adoption , 2015 .

[47]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[48]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Accessibility of U.S. federal government home pages: Section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Natalie Helbig,et al.  Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency , 2010, EGOV.

[52]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[53]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[54]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[55]  Bastiaan van Loenen,et al.  Brave New Open Data World? , 2012, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[56]  Daniel Lathrop,et al.  Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice , 2010 .

[57]  Anke Schmid,et al.  Psychological Testing Principles And Applications , 2016 .

[58]  Harlan Yu,et al.  The New Ambiguity of 'Open Government' , 2012 .

[59]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[60]  Jan Kallberg,et al.  Open Data as a Foundation for Innovation: The Enabling Effect of Free Public Sector Information for Entrepreneurs , 2013, IEEE Access.

[61]  Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen,et al.  Transparency and trust. An experimental study of online disclosure and trust in government , 2012 .