Brachytherapy needle deflection evaluation and correction.

In prostate brachytherapy, an 18-gauge needle is used to implant radioactive seeds. This thin needle can be deflected from the preplanned trajectory in the prostate, potentially resulting in a suboptimum dose pattern and at times requiring repeated needle insertion to achieve optimal dosimetry. In this paper, we report on the evaluation of brachytherapy needle deflection and bending in test phantoms and two approaches to overcome the problem. First we tested the relationship between needle deflection and insertion depth as well as whether needle bending occurred. Targeting accuracy was tested by inserting a brachytherapy needle to target 16 points in chicken tissue phantoms. By implanting dummy seeds into chicken tissue phantoms under 3D ultrasound guidance, the overall accuracy of seed implantation was determined. We evaluated methods to overcome brachytherapy needle deflection with three different insertion methods: constant orientation, constant rotation, and orientation reversal at half of the insertion depth. Our results showed that needle deflection is linear with needle insertion depth, and that no noticeable bending occurs with needle insertion into the tissue and agar phantoms. A 3D principal component analysis was performed to obtain the population distribution of needle tip and seed position relative to the target positions. Our results showed that with the constant orientation insertion method, the mean needle targeting error was 2.8 mm and the mean seed implantation error was 2.9 mm. Using the constant rotation and orientation reversal at half insertion depth methods, the deflection error was reduced. The mean needle targeting errors were 0.8 and 1.2 mm for the constant rotation and orientation reversal methods, respectively, and the seed implantation errors were 0.9 and 1.5 mm for constant rotation insertion and orientation reversal methods, respectively.

[1]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  The development and evaluation of a three-dimensional ultrasound-guided breast biopsy apparatus , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  R Nath,et al.  Permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy: report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 64. , 1999, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Blasko,et al.  Anticipating prostatic volume changes due to prostate brachytherapy. , 1999, Radiation oncology investigations.

[4]  Y. Yu,et al.  Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: report of the American Brachytherapy Society. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Comparison of Core Needle Breast Biopsy Techniques , 2002 .

[6]  R. Taschereau,et al.  Dosimetric impact of the variation of the prostate volume and shape between pretreatment planning and treatment procedure. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  P. Roberson,et al.  Source placement error for permanent implant of the prostate. , 1997, Medical physics.

[8]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Dosimetric effects of needle divergence in prostate seed implant using 125I and 103Pd radioactive seeds. , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  D. Downey,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound-guided core needle breast biopsy. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  P. Okunieff,et al.  Intraoperative optimized inverse planning for prostate brachytherapy: early experience. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  S. Tong,et al.  A three-dimensional ultrasound prostate imaging system. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  N. Yue,et al.  Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: an analysis based on serial CT acquisition. , 1998, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[13]  Gang Wan,et al.  Robot-assisted 3D-TRUS guided prostate brachytherapy: system integration and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[14]  D. A. Christopher,et al.  A wall-less vessel phantom for Doppler ultrasound studies. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  M Dattoli,et al.  A simple method to stabilize the prostate during transperineal prostate brachytherapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Julie Dawson,et al.  Dose effects of seeds placement deviations from pre-planned positions in ultrasound guided prostate implants , 1994 .

[17]  D. Downey,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging , 1995, Medical Imaging.