Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays

Techniques based on electroencephalography (EEG) measure the electric potentials on the scalp and process them to infer the location, distribution, and intensity of underlying neural activity. Accuracy in estimating these parameters is highly sensitive to uncertainty in the conductivities of the head tissues. Furthermore, dissimilarities among individuals are ignored when standardized values are used. In this paper, we apply the maximum-likelihood and maximum a posteriori (MAP) techniques to simultaneously estimate the layer conductivity ratios and source signal using EEG data. We use the classical 4-sphere model to approximate the head geometry, and assume a known dipole source position. The accuracy of our estimates is evaluated by comparing their standard deviations with the Crame/spl acute/r-Rao bound (CRB). The applicability of these techniques is illustrated with numerical examples on simulated EEG data. Our results show that the estimates have low bias and attain the CRB for sufficiently large number of experiments. We also present numerical examples evaluating the sensitivity to imprecise assumptions on the source position and skull thickness. Finally, we propose extensions to the case of unknown source position and present examples for real data.

[1]  M. Melamed Detection , 2021, SETI: Astronomy as a Contact Sport.

[2]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Parameter identifiability problem in signal processing , 1994 .

[3]  Mingni Sun,et al.  An efficient algorithm for computing multishell spherical volume conductor models in EEG dipole source localization , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  D. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  R E Ideker,et al.  Eccentric dipole in a spherical medium: generalized expression for surface potentials. , 1973, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[6]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[7]  P C Molenaar,et al.  Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[9]  K. K. Tan,et al.  The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best-fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[11]  D.R. Jackson,et al.  Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Aleksandar Dogandzic,et al.  Estimating evoked dipole responses in unknown spatially correlated noise with EEG/MEG arrays , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  G. Chavent,et al.  On Parameter Identifiability , 1985 .

[14]  Thom F. Oostendorp,et al.  The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Elias Jonsson,et al.  Electrical Conductivity Reconstruction Using Nonlocal Boundary Conditions , 1999, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[16]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  EEG/MEC error bounds for a static dipole source with a realistic head model , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  B. Radich,et al.  EEG dipole localization bounds and MAP algorithms for head models with parameter uncertainties , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  M. Hallett,et al.  An improved method for localizing electric brain dipoles , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Ray Johnson,et al.  Event-related brain potentials : basic issues and applications , 1990 .

[20]  Friedel Hartmann,et al.  What are boundary elements , 2004 .

[21]  Don M. Tucker,et al.  Regional head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  A. Nehorai,et al.  Magnetoencephalography with diversely oriented and multicomponent sensors , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I , 1968 .

[24]  Maurice G. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[25]  A. Dale,et al.  Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Fetsje Bijma,et al.  In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  K. Huebner The finite element method for engineers , 1975 .

[28]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood and Cramer-Rao bound , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[29]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.