Trust and terrorism: citizen responses to anti-terrorism performance history.

The "intuitive detection theorists" model of trust posits greater trust for correctly distinguishing danger from safety and an activist response under uncertainty about danger. An American sample evaluated U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) performance after two possible terrorism events in which DHS has the same activist or nonactivist response bias. Outcomes were two successes (bombing prevented or lack of threat accurately foretold), two failures (bombing or DHS action against high school prank leads to student deaths), or a mix. Hindsight empathy (a belief one would have made the same decision) differed across treatments but trust less so; contrary to a similar one-event experiment in Germany, an active but incorrect response did not raise trust relative to passive incorrect action. Political conservatives were much more trusting and empathetic than liberals, and all ideological groups (including moderates) exhibited little internal variation reflecting experimental conditions. Consistently accurate outcomes rated significantly higher in empathy than either inconsistent results or consistent inaccuracy (the lowest rated); trust exhibited no significant differences. Results in this study show actual (experimentally manipulated) performance being trumped by the interpretive screen of political ideology, but this seemed less the case in the earlier German study, despite its finding of a strong moderating effect of right-wing authoritarianism. Trust scholars need to attend more to effects of performance history (i.e., a sequence of events) and their limiting factors. More systematic testing of effects of ideology and performance history would enhance future research on trust.

[1]  S. Thoma,et al.  Is Political Conservatism Synonymous With Authoritarianism? , 2005, The Journal of social psychology.

[2]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Eric R. A. N. Smith,et al.  The Relationship between Cultural Values and Political Ideology, and the Role of Political Knowledge , 2009 .

[4]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Trust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  A. Van Hiel,et al.  The Impact of Need for Closure on Conservative Beliefs and Racism: Differential Mediation by Authoritarian Submission and Authoritarian Dominance , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  Gordon Wood,et al.  The knew-it-all-along effect. , 1978 .

[7]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated With Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity? , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[8]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[10]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[11]  S. Gosling,et al.  The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind , 2008 .

[12]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect in Risk Perception , 2007 .

[13]  B. Swedlow.  Beyond liberal and conservative: Two-dimensional conceptions of ideology and the structure of political attitudes and values , 2008 .

[14]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  New Information and Social Trust: Asymmetry and Perseverance of Attributions about Hazard Managers , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  G Saucier,et al.  Isms and the structure of social attitudes. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J A Swets,et al.  Psychological Science Can Improve Diagnostic Decisions , 2000, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[17]  Trudy Govier,et al.  Is It a Jungle Out There? Trust, Distrust and the Construction of Social Reality , 1994, Dialogue.

[18]  Alicia J. Knoedler,et al.  The shift from recency to primacy with increasing delay. , 1999 .

[19]  B. Swedlow,et al.  Value Preferences and Ideological Structuring of Attitudes in American Public Opinion , 2009 .

[20]  Sabine Pahl,et al.  Trust in Risky Messages: The Role of Prior Attitudes , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  J. Eiser,et al.  Marginal Trust in Risk Managers: Building and Losing Trust Following Decisions Under Uncertainty , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  M. White,et al.  Information Specificity and Hazard Risk Potential as Moderators of Trust Asymmetry , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model , 1992 .

[25]  Anja S. Göritz,et al.  The police officer's terrorist dilemma: trust resilience following fatal errors , 2008 .