Applying theory-driven evaluation to the British Crime Reduction Programme

The Crime Reduction Programme began in April 1999 and was largely finished by March 2002. It went through a number of major changes. It also incorporated an ambitious initial evaluation component and a range of forms of evaluation activity. This article traces the changing theories in and of the programme as a whole and the changing forms of evaluation that were conducted under its auspices. It attempts to explain how and why the programme metamorphosed and how and why provisions for evaluation activity evolved as they did. It tries to distil realistic lessons for the conduct of informative evaluation in the context of large-scale government programmes. It also attempts to locate the potential for realist evaluation within such programmes.

[1]  N. Tilley.  Analysis for Crime Prevention , 2002 .

[2]  N. Tilley,et al.  Crime reduction and problem-oriented policing , 2003 .

[3]  Nick Tilley,et al.  WHAT WORKS IN EVALUATION RESEARCH , 1994 .

[4]  C. Whitehead,et al.  Assessing cost-effectiveness , 2003 .

[5]  P. G. Lewis.  Reducing offending: An assessment of research evidence on ways of dealing with offending behaviour , 1998 .

[6]  W. Polder.  Crime prevention in the Netherlands : Pilot projects evaluated , 1992 .

[7]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Evaluating a Community Crime Prevention Program , 1997 .

[8]  K. Bowers,et al.  The measurement of crime prevention intensity and its impact on levels of crime , 2004 .

[9]  C. Rogers.  Community safety and zero tolerance : a study of partnership policing , 2002 .

[10]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Surveillance of Public Space: Cctv, Street Lighting and Crime Prevention , 1999 .

[11]  R. Clarke.  Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies , 1992 .

[12]  R. Clarke.  Situational Crime Prevention , 1995, Crime and Justice.

[13]  Trevor Bennett,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A POLICE-INITIATED FEAR-REDUCING STRATEGY , 1991 .

[14]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Evaluating ‘Communities that Care’ , 1998 .

[15]  Funding and implementing crime reduction initiatives , 2002 .

[16]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS: OBSERVATIONS ON THE REVERSE OF DISPLACEMENT , 2006 .

[17]  S. Brand,et al.  Analysis of costs and benefits: guidance for evaluators , 1999 .

[18]  S. Brand,et al.  The Economic and Social Costs of Crime , 2000 .

[19]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Burglary prevention: early lessons from the crime reduction programme , 1999 .

[20]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Effects of Closed-Circuit Television on Crime , 2003 .

[21]  Ken Pease,et al.  Crime Placement, Displacement, and Deflection , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[22]  Martha J. Smith,et al.  Anticipatory benefits in crime prevention , 2002 .

[23]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[24]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Investing to Deliver: Reviewing the Implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Programme Programme , 2004 .

[25]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Understanding Car Parks, Crime and CCTV: Evaluation Lessons from Safer Cities , 1993 .

[26]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Caring Communities, Paradigm Polemics, Design Debates , 1998 .

[27]  B. Poyner.  Situational Crime Prevention in Two Parking Facilities , 2006 .