Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.

Smartphone technology provides new opportunities for recording standardized voice samples of patients and sending the files by e-mail to the voice laboratory. This drastically improves the collection of baseline data, as used in research on efficiency of voice treatments. However, the basic requirement is the suitability of smartphones for recording and digitizing pathologic voices (mainly characterized by period perturbations and noise) without significant distortion. In this experiment, two smartphones (a very inexpensive one and a high-level one) were tested and compared with direct microphone recordings in a soundproof room. The voice stimuli consisted in synthesized deviant voice samples (median of fundamental frequency: 120 and 200 Hz) with three levels of jitter and three levels of added noise. All voice samples were analyzed using PRAAT software. The results show high correlations between jitter, shimmer, and noise-to-harmonics ratio measured on the recordings via both smartphones, the microphone, and measured directly on the sound files from the synthesizer. Smartphones thus appear adequate for reliable recording and digitizing of pathologic voices.

[1]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[2]  Rebecca R Andridge,et al.  Studies with staggered starts: multiple baseline designs and group-randomized trials. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[3]  J W Hawks,et al.  A formant bandwidth estimation procedure for vowel synthesis [43.72.Ja]. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Claudia Manfredi,et al.  Testing software tools with synthesized deviant voices for medicolegal assessment of occupational dysphonia , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[5]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[6]  Leonardo Bocchi,et al.  Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: The effect of noise , 2011, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[7]  Jean Schoentgen,et al.  Non-linear signal representation and its application to the modelling of the glottal waveform , 1990, Speech Commun..

[8]  Philippe H. Dejonckere,et al.  The use of acoustic parameters for the evaluation of voice therapy of dysphonic patients , 2004 .

[9]  Leonardo Bocchi,et al.  To what degree of voice perturbation are jitter measurements valid? A novel approach with synthesized vowels and visuo-perceptual pattern recognition , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[10]  Bradley E. Huitema,et al.  The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives: Statistical Methods for Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Single-Case Studies , 2011 .

[11]  Enzo Pasquale Scilingo,et al.  Smartphone Application for the Analysis of Prosodic Features in Running Speech with a Focus on Bipolar Disorders: System Performance Evaluation and Case Study , 2015, Sensors.

[12]  Jean Schoentgen,et al.  Shaping function models of the phonatory excitation signal. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Antanas Verikas,et al.  Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening , 2015, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[14]  Leach Ra The multiple baseline across subjects design: proposed use in research. , 1984 .

[15]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[16]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research , 1993 .

[17]  T. V. Ananthapadmanabha,et al.  Calculation of true glottal flow and its components , 1982, Speech Commun..

[18]  P. Dejonckere,et al.  A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques , 2001, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[19]  E. Lin,et al.  Evaluating iPhone Recordings for Acoustic Voice Assessment , 2012, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[20]  Leonardo Bocchi,et al.  erturbation measurements in highly irregular voice signals : erformances / validity of analysis software tools , 2011 .

[21]  Leonardo Bocchi,et al.  Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: Perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition , 2011, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.