Feasibility study of a take-home array-based functional electrical stimulation system with automated setup for current functional electrical stimulation users with foot-drop.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of unsupervised community use of an array-based automated setup functional electrical stimulator for current foot-drop functional electrical stimulation (FES) users. DESIGN Feasibility study. SETTING Gait laboratory and community use. PARTICIPANTS Participants (N=7) with diagnosis of unilateral foot-drop of central neurologic origin (>6mo) who were regular users of a foot-drop FES system (>3mo). INTERVENTION Array-based automated setup FES system for foot-drop (ShefStim). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Logged usage, logged automated setup times for the array-based automated setup FES system and diary recording of problems experienced, all collected in the community environment. Walking speed, ankle angles at initial contact, foot clearance during swing, and the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology version 2.0 (QUEST version 2.0) questionnaire, all collected in the gait laboratory. RESULTS All participants were able to use the array-based automated setup FES system. Total setup time took longer than participants' own FES systems, and automated setup time was longer than in a previous study of a similar system. Some problems were experienced, but overall, participants were as satisfied with this system as their own FES system. The increase in walking speed (N=7) relative to no stimulation was comparable between both systems, and appropriate ankle angles at initial contact (N=7) and foot clearance during swing (n=5) were greater with the array-based automated setup FES system. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that an array-based automated setup FES system for foot-drop can be successfully used unsupervised. Despite setup's taking longer and some problems, users are satisfied with the system and it would appear as effective, if not better, at addressing the foot-drop impairment. Further product development of this unique system, followed by a larger-scale and longer-term study, is required before firm conclusions about its efficacy can be reached.

[1]  Jim Richards,et al.  Whittle's gait analysis , 2012 .

[2]  P. Taylor,et al.  A randomized trial to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation and therapeutic exercise on walking performance for people with multiple sclerosis , 2009, Multiple sclerosis.

[3]  R. Chou,et al.  INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA , 2011 .

[4]  Su Ling Chong,et al.  BIONic WalkAide for correcting foot drop , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  P. Taylor,et al.  The Effects of the Odstock Drop Foot Stimulator on Perceived Quality of Life for People With Stroke and Multiple Sclerosis , 2010, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[6]  G. Loeb,et al.  BIONic WalkAide for correcting foot drop , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of an implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator on walking speed and activity in poststroke hemiplegia. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  T Sinkjaer,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic analysis of the walking pattern in hemiplegic patients with foot-drop using a peroneal nerve stimulator. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Cathy Bulley,et al.  “Functional electrical stimulation (FES) impacted on important aspects of my life”—A qualitative exploration of chronic stroke patients' and carers' perceptions of FES in the management of dropped foot , 2012, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[10]  J. Barbenel,et al.  Peroneal stimulator; evaluation for the correction of spastic drop foot in hemiplegia. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Gait in Individuals with Chronic Hemiparesis: One-Year Follow-up of the Effects of a Neuroprosthesis That Ameliorates Foot Drop , 2009, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[12]  Brian J Hafner,et al.  Effect of a Foot-Drop Stimulator and Ankle–Foot Orthosis on Walking Performance After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  R. Begg,et al.  Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[14]  S. Studenski,et al.  Meaningful Change and Responsiveness in Common Physical Performance Measures in Older Adults , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  James E. Graham,et al.  Relationship between test methodology and mean velocity in timed walk tests: a review. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  R. Stein,et al.  Long-Term Therapeutic and Orthotic Effects of a Foot Drop Stimulator on Walking Performance in Progressive and Nonprogressive Neurological Disorders , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  Vivian Weerdesteyn,et al.  Is transcutaneous peroneal stimulation beneficial to patients with chronic stroke using an ankle-foot orthosis? A within-subjects study of patients' satisfaction, walking speed and physical activity level. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[18]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  A Multicenter Trial of a Footdrop Stimulator Controlled by a Tilt Sensor , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  Susan Coote,et al.  Surface-applied functional electrical stimulation for orthotic and therapeutic treatment of drop-foot after stroke – a systematic review , 2009 .

[20]  D. Howard,et al.  A finite element model to identify electrode influence on current distribution in the skin. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[21]  D. Howard,et al.  The effect of the impedance of a thin hydrogel electrode on sensation during functional electrical stimulation. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  Ben W Heller,et al.  Automated setup of functional electrical stimulation for drop foot using a novel 64 channel prototype stimulator and electrode array: results from a gait-lab based study. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  D Howard,et al.  Effects of ramp negotiation, paving type and shoe sole geometry on toe clearance in young adults. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Vivian Weerdesteyn,et al.  Effect of Peroneal Electrical Stimulation Versus an Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Obstacle Avoidance Ability in People With Stroke-Related Foot Drop , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[25]  C. Wolfson,et al.  Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  The orthotic effect of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of walking in stroke patients with a dropped foot: a systematic review. , 2004, Artificial organs.

[27]  Michael J. Campbell,et al.  Correspondenceis a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy , 2010 .

[28]  D Howard,et al.  Biomechanics for inclusive urban design : effects of tactile paving on older adults ’ , 2018 .

[29]  Jane H Burridge,et al.  Walking on an Uneven Surface: The Effect of Common Peroneal Stimulation on Gait Parameters and Relationship Between Perceived and Measured Benefits in a Sample of Participants With a Drop‐Foot , 2007, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[30]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[31]  D. Howard,et al.  The use of hydrogel as an electrode-skin interface for electrode array FES applications. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[32]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[33]  G. Mann,et al.  Impact on activities of daily living using a functional electrical stimulation device to improve dropped foot in people with multiple sclerosis, measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[34]  Michael W. Whittle.  Methods of Gait Analysis , 1991 .

[35]  P. Taylor,et al.  Clinical audit of 5 years provision of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[36]  J. Norton,et al.  Patients' perceptions of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator (ODFS) , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[37]  Ben W Heller,et al.  The development, preliminary validation and clinical utility of a shoe model to quantify foot and footwear kinematics in 3-D. , 2012, Gait & posture.