Cost of reclaimed municipal wastewater for applications in seasonally stressed semi-arid regions

E. Gonzalez-Serrano The effectiveness and the cost of wastewater treatment options appropriate for different uses of reclaimed water in seasonally stressed regions are evaluated. Data are for applications in locales of the semi-arid regions of the Mediterranean rim and islands. These regions experience water demand stresses mainly from seasonally intense tourism and agriculture. With precipitation- derived resources fixed, recycled treated wastewater is a non-traditional, potentially cost- effective alternative water source that can be secured to meet certain demands. Different levels of wastewater treatment have been studied, Ti, satisfying effluent quality standards corresponding to four final effluent destinations: T1, for a sea outfall or surface waters (zero- alternative, for comparison); T2, for irrigation (USEPA guidelines); T3, for aquifer recharge by infiltration from spreading fields (guidelines of the California Department of Health Services) and T4, for aquifer recharge by direct injection (USA Drinking Water Standards). The result is a set of cost functions for investment I and for operation and maintenance O&M developed based on the technical design and the cost estimation of the unit processes and operations of the studied wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).

[1]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Artificial recharge of groundwater , 1985 .

[2]  James M. Montgomery,et al.  Water Treatment Principles and Design , 1985 .

[3]  A Pollice,et al.  Tertiary filtered municipal wastewater as alternative water source in agriculture: a field investigation in Southern Italy. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  A comparative analysis of methods to represent uncertainty in estimating the cost of constructing wastewater treatment plants. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Miguel A. Mariño,et al.  Benefit-Cost Model for an Artificial Recharge Scenario in the San Joaquin Valley, California , 1999 .

[6]  A. Kanarek,et al.  Groundwater recharge with municipal effluent: Dan region reclamation project, Israel , 1996 .

[7]  Michael Johnson,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Artificial Recharge in Las Vegas Valley, Nevada , 2002 .

[8]  Harry Futselaar,et al.  Effluent reuse at Barranco Seco (Spain): a 1,000 m3/h case study , 2004 .

[9]  G. Destouni,et al.  Intensive groundwater development in coastal zones and small islands , 2003 .

[10]  Nava Haruvy,et al.  Agricultural reuse of wastewater: nation-wide cost-benefit analysis , 1997 .

[11]  M. Ergil.  The salination problem of the Guzelyurt aquifer, Cyprus , 2000 .

[12]  Iacovos Papaiacovou.  Case study — wastewater reuse in Limassol as an alternative water source , 2001 .

[13]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal wastewater: health and regulatory considerations. , 2004, Water research.

[14]  Miquel Salgot,et al.  Existing guidelines and regulations in Spain on wastewater reclamation and reuse , 1996 .

[15]  R. L. Lawrence,et al.  Wastewater reclamation at Rancho Murieta, California; golf course irrigation with upgraded pond effluent meeting California's strictest requirements for wastewater reuse , 1995 .

[16]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Analysis of a Long Record of Annual Maximum Rainfall in Athens, Greece, and Design Rainfall Inferences , 2000 .

[17]  Pedro J. Restrepo,et al.  A methodology to investigate brackish groundwater desalination coupled with aquifer recharge by treated wastewater as an alternative strategy for water supply in Mediterranean areas , 2001 .

[18]  H. Siegrist.  Nitrogen removal from digester supernatant - comparison of chemical and biological methods , 1996 .