Phase aligned ensemble averaging for environmental flow studies

The quantification of turbulent mixing in nature is predicated by inherent randomness of causal events, and obtaining relevant turbulence statistics requires ensemble averaging of identical realizations that are unachievable in field observations or onerous in laboratory situations. Laboratory modeling is often used to study nonstationary natural processes, but jitters due to intrinsic variability of events as well as experimental uncertainties introduce additional (spurious) fluctuations that affect ensemble averaging of individual realizations. In this paper, the phase-aligned ensemble averaging technique (PAET), which aligns the events based on information on flow structures, is introduced in the context of environmental fluid mechanics studies. The accuracy and computational efficiency of PAET are investigated systematically for two cases: (1) synthetic density field alignment and (2) laboratory flows involving collision of counter flowing gravity currents. The latter is a frequent phenomenon in the stable atmospheric boundary layer in mountainous areas. In the synthetic density field case, the PAET aligns the complex structures precisely within the allowable range of measurement accuracy. For the experimental gravity current case, the precisely aligned result is unknown, and the results of PAET are compared with those obtained with the Monte Carlo method, a simulated annealing algorithm, and the gradient descent method; the PAET was found to be the most efficient. This study broaches the PAET as a versatile method for obtaining accurate turbulence statistics in laboratory experiments designed to mimic environmental flows where spatial and temporal inhomogeneities abound.

[1]  Imad A. Hannoun,et al.  Turbulence structure near a sharp density interface , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Robert J. Martinuzzi,et al.  Alternating half-loop shedding in the turbulent wake of a finite surface-mounted square cylinder with a thin boundary layer , 2011 .

[3]  Pedro Faria,et al.  Intelligent energy resource management considering vehicle-to-grid: A Simulated Annealing approach , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[4]  Stuart B. Dalziel,et al.  Gravity currents produced by lock exchange , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Harindra J. S. Fernando,et al.  Entrainment and mixing in stratified shear flows , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Khairul Q. Zaman,et al.  Vortex pairing in a circular jet under controlled excitation. Part 2. Coherent structure dynamics , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  Duo Xu,et al.  Experimental study of stratified jet by simultaneous measurements of velocity and density fields , 2012, Experiments in Fluids.

[8]  Valdis Kibens,et al.  Large-scale motion in the intermittent region of a turbulent boundary layer , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Scott Kirkpatrick,et al.  Optimization by Simmulated Annealing , 1983, Sci..

[10]  Kevin Boston,et al.  An analysis of Monte Carlo integer programming, simulated annealing, and tabu search heuristics for solving spatial harvest scheduling problems. , 1999 .

[11]  A. Hussain,et al.  Eduction of large-scale organized structures in a turbulent plane wake , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  W. Willmarth,et al.  Structure of the Reynolds stress near the wall , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  S. Dreyfus,et al.  Thermodynamical Approach to the Traveling Salesman Problem : An Efficient Simulation Algorithm , 2004 .

[14]  A. Hussain,et al.  Coherent structures and turbulence , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  I. Wygnanski,et al.  The two-dimensional mixing region , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Israel J Wygnanski,et al.  Transitional boundary layer spot in a fully turbulent environment , 1977 .

[17]  R. J. Adrian Turbulent convection in water over ice , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  William Conley,et al.  Computer optimization techniques , 1980 .

[19]  M. F. Cardoso,et al.  A simulated annealing approach to the solution of minlp problems , 1997 .

[20]  G. Seminara Fluvial Sedimentary Patterns , 2010 .

[21]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[22]  Qiang Zhong,et al.  Quantification of turbulent mixing in colliding gravity currents , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  A. Hussain,et al.  A ‘turbulent spot’ in an axisymmetric free shear layer. Part 2 , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  J. Wyngaard Turbulence in the Atmosphere: Contents , 2010 .

[25]  Marida Bertocchi,et al.  A Monte-Carlo approach for 0–1 programming problems , 2005, Computing.

[26]  Arne V. Johansson,et al.  Evolution and dynamics of shear-layer structures in near-wall turbulence , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  J. Lumley Stochastic tools in turbulence , 1970 .

[28]  Fazle Hussain,et al.  Coherent structures near the wall in a turbulent channel flow , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.