The Influence of the Addition Position of a Tracer on CFD Simulated Mixing Times in a Vessel Agitated by a Rushton Turbine

Previous papers on simulated mixing times in stirred vessels using CFD have sometimes given predictions in good agreement with empirical equations based on experiments and some have not. In this study, mixing times have been measured for a vessel agitated by a Rushton turbine and compared with those predicted by CFD. The flow field was developed using the sliding mesh approach and computational parameters and the point of addition of the tracer have been varied. The simulations were very insensitive to the former whilst the radial distance from the wall of the latter had a very profound effect on both the mixing time and the development of the concentration field. When the addition point was close to the sliding mesh surface, the simulation was in good agreement with experimental values and empirical predictions whilst that for a point close to the wall was much too long. This finding may explain the contradictions in the literature.

[1]  J. B. Fasano,et al.  Avoid blending mix-ups , 1991 .

[2]  Suzanne M. Kresta,et al.  Prediction of the three-dimensional turbulent flow in stirred tanks , 1991 .

[3]  W. Jones,et al.  The calculation of low-Reynolds-number phenomena with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1973 .

[4]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  The dependency on scale of power numbers of Rushton disc turbines , 1987 .

[5]  Julian B. Fasano,et al.  Turbulent Mixing and Chemical Reaction in Stirred Tanks , 2000 .

[6]  Do Hyun Kim,et al.  Effect of Impeller Clearance on Flow Structure and Mixing in Bioreactor with Two‐Stage Impellers , 2001 .

[7]  Zdzisław Jaworski,et al.  CFD modelling of turbulent macromixing in stirred tanks. Effect of the probe size and number on mixing indices , 1998 .

[8]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  CFD Study of Homogenization with Dual Rushton Turbines—Comparison with Experimental Results: Part II: The Multiple Reference Frame☆ , 2000 .

[9]  Bengt Andersson,et al.  EVALUATION OF A METHOD FOR MEASURING MIXING TIME USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1995 .

[10]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  Sliding mesh computational fluid dynamics—a predictive tool in stirred tank design , 1997 .

[11]  Václav Kolář,et al.  The swirling radial jet , 1982 .

[12]  A. Nienow,et al.  CFD Study of Homogenization with Dual Rushton Turbines—Comparison with Experimental Results: Part I: Initial Studies☆ , 2000 .

[13]  Alberto Brucato,et al.  Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: A comparison of alternative modelling approaches , 1998 .

[14]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Fluid mechanics and blending in agitated tanks , 1991 .

[15]  N. Otomo.  A Study of Mixing with Dual Radial and Dual Axial Flow Impellers : Blending and Power Characteristics , 1996 .

[16]  Sreenivas Jayanti,et al.  CFD Study of Power and Mixing Time for Paddle Mixing in Unbaffled Vessels , 2002 .

[17]  V. Novák,et al.  Effect of the measured volume size on the homogenization time , 1976 .

[18]  W. Jones,et al.  The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1972 .