Sonification of Surface Tapping Changes Behavior, Surface Perception, and Emotion

The audio feedback resulting from object interaction provides information about the material of the surface and about one's own motor behavior. With the current developments in interactive sonification, it's now possible to digitally change this audio feedback, making the use of interactive sonification a compelling approach to shape tactile surface interactions. Here, the authors present a prototype for a sonic interactive surface, capable of delivering surface tapping sounds in real time when triggered by users' taps on a real surface or on an imagined "virtual" surface. In this system, the delivered audio feedback can be varied so that the tapping sounds correspond to different applied strengths during tapping. The authors also propose a multidimensional measurement approach to evaluate user experiences of multimodal interactive systems. They evaluated their system by looking at the effect of the altered tapping sounds on emotional action-related responses, the users' interactions with the surface, and perceived surface hardness. Results show the influence of the sonification of tapping at all levels: emotional, behavioral, and perceptual. These results have implications on the design of interactive sonification displays and tangible auditory interfaces aiming to change perceived and subsequent motor behavior as well as perceived material properties.

[1]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[2]  Davide Rocchesso,et al.  The Sounding Object , 2002 .

[3]  Stephen Brewster,et al.  Mixed Feelings: Multimodal Perception of Virtual Roughness , 2002 .

[4]  J. Peck,et al.  It Just Feels Good: Customers’ Affective Response to Touch and Its Influence on Persuasion: , 2006 .

[5]  Hayes Raffle,et al.  The sound of touch , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  Hayes Raffle,et al.  The sound of touch: physical manipulation of digital sound , 2008, CHI.

[7]  Joseph S. Dumas,et al.  Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability questionnaires , 2009, CHI.

[8]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Multisensory Texture Perception , 2010 .

[9]  M. Vetterli,et al.  Feeling in control of your footsteps: Conscious gait monitoring and the auditory consequences of footsteps , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[10]  Nina Schaffert,et al.  Listen to the boat motion: acoustic information for elite rowers , 2010 .

[11]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  When Ears Drive Hands: The Influence of Contact Sound on Reaching to Grasp , 2010, PloS one.

[12]  Federico Fontana,et al.  Expressive sonification of footstep sounds , 2010 .

[13]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Multisensory Object Perception in the Primate Brain , 2010 .

[14]  Davide Rocchesso,et al.  The Sonification Handbook , 2011 .

[15]  What Does Touch Tell Us about Emotions in Touchscreen-Based Gameplay? , 2012, TCHI.

[16]  M. Tsakiris,et al.  Action sounds recalibrate perceived tactile distance , 2012, Current Biology.

[17]  M. S. Hane Aung,et al.  Getting RID of pain-related behaviour to improve social and self perception: A technology-based perspective , 2013, 2013 14th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (WIAMIS).

[18]  Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze,et al.  Understanding the Role of Body Movement in Player Engagement , 2012, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Jan Hammerschmidt,et al.  Blended Sonification –Sonification For Casual Information Interaction , 2013 .