PolyJet 3D-Printed Enclosed Microfluidic Channels without Photocurable Supports.

Microfluidic devices have historically been prepared using fabrication techniques that often include photolithography and/or etching. Recently, additive manufacturing technologies, commonly known as 3D-printing, have emerged as fabrication tools for microfluidic devices. Unfortunately, PolyJet 3D-printing, which utilizes a photocurable resin that can be accurately printed, requires the use of support material for any designed void space internal to the model. Removing the support material from the printed channels is difficult in small channels with single dimensions of less than ∼200 μm and nearly impossible to remove from designs that contain turns or serpentines. Here, we describe techniques for printing channels ranging in cross sections from 0.6 cm × 1.5 cm to 125 μm × 54 μm utilizing commercially available PolyJet printers that require minimal to no postprocessing to form sealed channels. Specifically, printer software manipulation allows printing of one model with an open channel or void that is sealed with either a viscous liquid or a polycarbonate membrane (no commercially available support material). The printer stage is then adjusted and a second model is printed directly on top of the first model with the selected support system. Both the liquid-fill and the membrane method have enough structural integrity to support the printing resin while it is being cured. Importantly, such complex channel geometries as serpentine and Y-mixers can be designed, printed, and in use in under 2 h. We demonstrate device utility by measuring ATP release from flowing red blood cells using a luciferin/luciferase chemiluminescent assay that involves on-chip mixing and optical detection.

[1]  G. Whitesides The origins and the future of microfluidics , 2006, Nature.

[2]  Emmanuel Delamarche,et al.  Lab-on-a-chip devices , 2015 .

[3]  R. Sprague,et al.  Regulation of blood flow distribution in skeletal muscle: role of erythrocyte‐released ATP , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  D. J. Harrison,et al.  Micromachining a Miniaturized Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Chemical Analysis System on a Chip , 1993, Science.

[5]  J. Lewis,et al.  3D Microperiodic Hydrogel Scaffolds for Robust Neuronal Cultures , 2011, Advanced functional materials.

[6]  Ultrafiltration binding analyses of glycated albumin with a 3D-printed syringe attachment , 2018, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[7]  Petr Smejkal,et al.  Comparing Microfluidic Performance of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Platforms. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  Jürgen Hubbuch,et al.  Microfluidics on liquid handling stations (μF-on-LHS): an industry compatible chip interface between microfluidics and automated liquid handling stations. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Masaki Tsuchiya,et al.  Microfluidic devices fabricated using stereolithography for preparation of monodisperse double emulsions , 2016 .

[10]  Dana M Spence,et al.  Addressing a vascular endothelium array with blood components using underlying microfluidic channels. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[11]  R. Sprague,et al.  Prostacyclin Analogs Stimulate Receptor‐Mediated cAMP Synthesis and ATP Release from Rabbit and Human Erythrocytes , 2008, Microcirculation.

[12]  D. Silva,et al.  Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy. , 2009, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[13]  Michael J. Beauchamp,et al.  Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices , 2017, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.