Analysing normal and partial glossectomee tongues using ultrasound

The present study aimed at identifying underlying parameters that govern the shape of the tongue. A functional topography of the tongue surface was developed based on three‐dimensional ultrasound scans of sustained speech sounds in ten normal subjects. A principal component analysis extracted three components that explained 89.2% of the variance at 33 measurement points on the tongue surface. The results from the principal component analysis supported a physiologically plausible three‐component model of tongue movement. This model breaks tongue movement down into a protrusion and retraction component that is represented by the measurement points on the posterior tongue, a tongue tip control component that is represented by the measurement points on the tongue blade, and a dorsal height and position control component that is represented by the measurement points on the tongue dorsum. A case series of three patients with partial glossectomies illustrates how this measurement system can be applied to surgically altered tongues to allow a detailed analysis of post‐surgical function.

[1]  H. Kaiser The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[2]  K. Blackwell,et al.  Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the oral cavity and oropharynx. , 2000, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[3]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing. , 1998, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[4]  Martin W. Donner,et al.  Normal and abnormal swallowing : imaging in diagnosis and therapy , 1991 .

[5]  M. B. Mann,et al.  The effects of glossectomy on intelligibility of speech and oral perceptual discrimination. , 1980, Journal of oral surgery.

[6]  Rentschler Gj,et al.  The effects of glossectomy on intelligibility of speech and oral perceptual discrimination. , 1980 .

[7]  G Papcun,et al.  Two cross-linguistic factors underlying tongue shapes for vowels. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Factor analysis of tongue shapes. , 1971, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Teichgraeber,et al.  A comparison of three methods of oral reconstruction. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[10]  H. Takemoto,et al.  Morphological analyses of the human tongue musculature for three-dimensional modeling. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  M. Stone,et al.  Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A J Lundberg,et al.  Three-dimensional tongue surface reconstruction: practical considerations for ultrasound data. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  K A Morrish,et al.  Tongue curvature: a model of shape during vowel production. , 1987, Folia phoniatrica.

[14]  S. Abd-El-Malek,et al.  Observations on the morphology of the human tongue. , 1939, Journal of anatomy.

[15]  D J Ostry,et al.  A dynamic biomechanical model for neural control of speech production. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R R Miethke,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of tongue movement during swallowing. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[17]  R. Schmelzeisen,et al.  Functional effects of a free jejunum flap used for reconstruction in the oropharyngeal region. , 1993, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[18]  M. Stone A three-dimensional model of tongue movement based on ultrasound and x-ray microbeam data. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  V. Konstantinovic,et al.  Articulatory function and tongue mobility after surgery followed by radiotherapy for tongue and floor of the mouth cancer patients. , 1998, British journal of plastic surgery.

[20]  J M Rubin,et al.  Pseudo-three-dimensional reconstruction of ultrasonic images of the tongue. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  S. Maeda,et al.  From EMG to Formant Patterns of Vowels: The Implication of Vowel Spaces , 1994, Phonetica.

[22]  H. Langstein,et al.  Functional results after oropharyngeal reconstruction: a different perspective. , 1999, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[23]  B. Sonies,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging and Swallowing , 2003 .

[24]  P. Hoole,et al.  On the lingual organization of the German vowel system. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M. Jackson Analysis of tongue positions: language-specific and cross-linguistic models. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Speech and swallow function after tonsil/base of tongue resection with primary closure. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  M. Stone,et al.  Lingual action in normal sequential swallowing. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[28]  Shinji Maeda,et al.  Compensatory Articulation During Speech: Evidence from the Analysis and Synthesis of Vocal-Tract Shapes Using an Articulatory Model , 1990 .

[29]  W S Levine,et al.  Modeling the motion of the internal tongue from tagged cine-MRI images. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.