Emission consequences of introducing bio ethanol as a fuel for gasoline cars.

Abstract This article describes the direct vehicle emission impact of the future use of bio ethanol as a fuel for gasoline cars in Denmark arising from the vehicle specific fuel consumption and emission differences between neat gasoline (E0) and E5/E85 gasoline-ethanol fuel blends derived from emission tests using primarily the European NEDC and ARTEMIS driving cycles. The E0-E5 test vehicles (nine cars) represent today’s gasoline car traffic well where most of the driving is being made with cars certified as Euro 3+. The FFV test cars (25 cars) are all certified according to the Euro 4 emission standard introduced in Europe from the mid-2000s. This matches well with the propagation of the FFV technology in Europe. For vehicles using E5 rather than E0, the average fuel consumption and emission differences are small. For CO, VOC and NO x the derived average differences are 0.5%, −5% and 7%, respectively. For FFVs using E85 rather than E5, the emission differences become even smaller for VOC and NO x , but greater for CO. The derived average emission differences are in this case 18%, −1% and 5% for CO, VOC and NO x , respectively. In both comparative cases there is a large variation in the emission difference values calculated for the individual cars. The large standard deviations introduce some uncertainties in the final averages computed for each emission component. The vehicle based emissions are made up for two fossil fuel baseline scenarios (FS), characterised by high and low traffic growth rates. For each FS, two biofuel scenarios (BS1, BS2) are presented. BS1 reaches the Danish policy targets (10% biofuel share in 2020). BS2 is more ambitious (25% in 2030). By definition the biofuel part of the combusted fuel is CO 2 neutral and the maximum CO 2 emission difference between FS and BS2 becomes 27% in 2030. As predicted by the vehicle specific emission differences the calculated emission impacts of using bio ethanol are small for NO x , VOC and CO. Instead, for FS, BS1 and BS2 large emission reductions are due to the gradually cleaner new sold gasoline cars and the decline in total mileage until the mid-2010s.

[1]  Stavros G. Poulopoulos,et al.  Regulated and unregulated emissions from an internal combustion engine operating on ethanol-containing fuels , 2001 .

[2]  Emissions of regulated pollutants from a spark ignition engine. Influence of fuel and air/fuel equivalence ratio. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  André Faaij,et al.  Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems , 2010 .

[4]  J. van Stam,et al.  An Alternative Fuel for Spark Ignition Engines , 2006 .

[5]  Can Çinar,et al.  The effects of ethanol–unleaded gasoline blends and ignition timing on engine performance and exhaust emissions , 2006 .

[6]  Marc Londo,et al.  The REFUEL EU road map for biofuels in transport: Application of the project's tools to some short-term policy issues , 2010 .

[7]  Yakup Sekmen,et al.  The effects of ethanol―unleaded gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emissions in a spark-ignition engine , 2009 .

[8]  Can Çinar,et al.  Effect of ethanol-gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emissions in different compression ratios , 2006 .

[9]  Lisa Graham,et al.  Emissions from light duty gasoline vehicles operating on low blend ethanol gasoline and E85 , 2008 .

[10]  Martini Giorgio,et al.  Effect of Fuel Ethanol Content on Exhaust Emissions of a Flexible Fuel Vehicle , 2009 .

[11]  Fikret Yuksel,et al.  The use of ethanol–gasoline blend as a fuel in an SI engine , 2004 .

[12]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Sources of variability in greenhouse gas and energy balances for biofuel production: a systematic review , 2010 .