Multi-criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long-term research planning

Abstract We present the results of a feasibility study conducted to the order of the Commission of the European Communities (Directorate-General for Science, Research, and Development). We used a method of pairwise comparisons to rank and rate a number of non-nuclear energy research programs under criteria which were felt to be relevant for a European energy policy. Thereafter, we employed the final scores of the programs to calculate optimal reallocations of the research budget, assuming that there is only a small number of distinct support levels for each program. The main objective of the study was to experiment with multi-criteria analysis and to design a robust reallocation method, although there is no unique numerical scale to quantify verbal human judgement and no unique cost-benefit relationship. The reallocation method is based on an elaborate sensitivity analysis.

[1]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis as an aid to the strategic planning of energy R & D , 1986 .

[2]  Alexander H. G. Rinnooy Kan,et al.  Concurrent stochastic methods for global optimization , 1990, Math. Program..

[3]  Geoff Lockett,et al.  Modelling a Research Portfolio Using AHP: A Group Decision Process , 1986 .

[4]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Fuzzy Performance Evaluation of Nonlinear Optimization Methods, with Sensitivity Analysis of the Final Scores , 1989 .

[5]  A. H. Gholamnezhad.  A new model in the energy policy planning , 1983 .

[6]  A. E. Gear,et al.  A review of some recent developments in portfolio modelling in applied research and development , 1974 .

[7]  F. A. Lootsma.  Modélisation du jugement humain dans l'analyse multicritère au moyen de comparaisons par paires , 1987 .

[8]  F. Lootsma.  Saaty's priority theory and the nomination of a senior professor in operations Research , 1980 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[10]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  Analysis of some portfolio selection models for R&D , 1971 .

[11]  Boris Odynocki.  The forward and backward processes in health policy planning , 1983 .

[12]  F. Lootsma,et al.  Pairwise-comparison methods in multiple objective programming, with applications in a long-term energy-planning model , 1985 .

[13]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  Strategic planning for investment in R&D using decision analysis and mathematical programming , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  Freerk A. Lootsma,et al.  Performance evaluation of nonlinear optimization methods via pairwise comparison and fuzzy numbers , 1985, Math. Program..

[15]  Kamal Golabi,et al.  Selecting a portfolio of nonhomogeneous R&D proposals☆ , 1985 .

[16]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  On the Solution of Convex Knapsack Problems with Bounded Variables. , 1977 .

[17]  Kamal Golabi,et al.  Selecting a Portfolio of Solar Energy Projects Using Multiattribute Preference Theory , 1981 .

[18]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Numerical scaling of human judgement in pairwise-comparison methods for fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis , 1988 .

[19]  F. Lootsma,et al.  Scheduling of power generation via large-scale nonlinear optimization , 1987 .