Modeling long-term soil losses on agricultural fields due to ephemeral gully erosion

It is now recognized worldwide that soil erosion on agricultural fields due to ephemeral gullies may be greater than those losses attributed to sheet and rill erosion processes. Yet it is not known whether the common practice of repairing or obliterating these gullies during annual tillage activities exacerbates or mitigates soil losses over long time periods. Here, a numerical model is used to demonstrate the potential effects of annual tillage on cumulative soil losses from four geographic regions plagued by ephemeral gullies as compared to no-till conditions where the gullies are free to grow and evolve over time and space. Historical precipitation data and field measurements were compiled for specific sites in Belgium, Mississippi, Iowa, and Georgia, and the model simulated ephemeral gully development and evolution during the growing seasons over a continuous 10-year period. When agricultural fields are not tilled annually, the simulations suggest that gullies attain their maximum dimensions during the first few years in response to several relatively large runoff events. During subsequent runoff events, the gullies no longer erode their channels significantly, and soil losses due to gully erosion decrease markedly. When agricultural fields are tilled annually, the ephemeral gully channels are reactivated, thus causing significant soil losses each year in response to runoff events. Over the 10-year simulation, the modeling results suggest that erosion rates in these four geographic regions can be 250% to 450% greater when gullies are tilled and reactivated annually as opposed to the no-till condition. These results reveal that routine filling of ephemeral gully channels during tillage practices may result in markedly higher rates of soil loss as compared to allowing these gullies to persist on the landscape, demonstrating a further advantage of adopting no-till management practices.

[1]  J. Poesen,et al.  Seasonal variations in soil erosion resistance during concentrated flow for a loess-derived soil under two contrasting tillage practices , 2007 .

[2]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  SIMULATING EPHEMERAL GULLY EROSION IN ANNAGNPS , 2007 .

[3]  J. Poesen,et al.  Resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion: A review , 2007 .

[4]  Timothy A. Quine,et al.  Tillage erosion: a review of controlling factors and implications for soil quality , 2006 .

[5]  J. Casalí,et al.  Assessing soil erosion rates in cultivated areas of Navarre (Spain) , 2006 .

[6]  A. Capra,et al.  Application of the EGEM model to predict ephemeral gully erosion in Sicily, Italy , 2005 .

[7]  George,et al.  MODELING EPHEMERAL GULLY EROSION FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING , 2005 .

[8]  E. E. Alberts,et al.  Soil Hydraulic Properties Influenced by Stiff‐Stemmed Grass Hedge Systems , 2004 .

[9]  K. C. McGregor,et al.  HISTORY, RESIDUE, AND TILLAGE EFFECTS ON EROSION OF LOESSIAL SOIL , 2004 .

[10]  P. Fiener,et al.  Effectiveness of grassed waterways in reducing runoff and sediment delivery from agricultural watersheds. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[11]  J. Poesen,et al.  Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs , 2003 .

[12]  S. Bennett,et al.  Predicting head cut erosion and migration in concentrated flows typical of upland areas , 2002 .

[13]  J. Poesen,et al.  Medium-term evolution of a gully developed in a loess-derived soil , 2002 .

[14]  J. Poesen,et al.  Prediction of concentrated flow width in ephemeral gully channels , 2002 .

[15]  J. Poesen,et al.  Ephemeral gullies. A spatial and temporal analysis of their characteristics, importance and prediction , 2002 .

[16]  A. Steegen,et al.  The value of a physically based model versus an empirical approach in the prediction of ephemeral gully erosion for loess-derived soils , 2001 .

[17]  J. Poesen,et al.  Testing the Ephemeral Gully Erosion Model (EGEM) for two Mediterranean environments , 2001 .

[18]  R. Cruse,et al.  Water Drop Impact Angle and Soybean Protein Amendment Effects on Soil Detachment , 2000 .

[19]  An Steegen,et al.  Sediment export by water from an agricultural catchment in the Loam Belt of central Belgium , 2000 .

[20]  Javier Casalí,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF ACTIVELY ERODING EPHEMERAL GULLIES IN AN EXPERIMENTAL CHANNEL , 2000 .

[21]  Donald Woodward,et al.  A user agency's view of hydrologic, soil erosion and water quality modelling , 1999 .

[22]  L. D. Meyer,et al.  CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS TO CONTROL EROSION AND REDUCE RUNOFF FROM UPLAND SILTY SOILS , 1997 .

[23]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits , 1995, Science.

[24]  D. Tyler,et al.  Bulk Density and Fragipan Identification in Loess Soils of the Lower Mississippi River Valley , 1994 .

[25]  L. Smith.  Investigation of Ephemeral Gullies in Loessial Soils in Mississippi , 1993 .

[26]  William J. Elliot,et al.  Critical shear stress and critical flow rates for initiation of rilling , 1993 .

[27]  L. J. Lane,et al.  Development and application of modern soil erosion prediction technology - The USDA experience , 1992 .

[28]  William J. Elliot,et al.  WEPP: soil erodibility experiments for rangeland and cropland soils , 1991 .

[29]  D. Woodward,et al.  Method to predict cropland ephemeral gully erosion , 1999 .

[30]  A. W. Thomas,et al.  Measurement of Ephemeral Gully Erosion , 1988 .

[31]  R. Welch,et al.  Quantifying concentrated-flow erosion on cropland with aerial photogrammetry , 1986 .

[32]  R. T. Roberts,et al.  Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (TR-55 Rev.) , 1985 .

[33]  L. Lane,et al.  Estimating sediment yield from rangeland with CREAMS a field-scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems , 1982 .

[34]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  CREAMS: a field scale model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems [USA] , 1980 .

[35]  G. R. Foster,et al.  An Erosion Equation Derived from Basic Erosion Principles , 1977 .

[36]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Suspended Sediment Filtration Capacity of Simulated Vegetation , 1976 .

[37]  M. Gordon Wolman,et al.  Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology , 1965 .

[38]  M. E. Austin.  Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States (exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii) , 1965 .