"Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation" (SMCE)"

The main argument developed here is the proposal of the concept of “Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation” (SMCE) as a possible useful framework for the application of social choice to the difficult policy problems of our Millennium, where, as stated by Funtowicz and Ravetz, “facts are uncertain, values in dispute, stakes high and decisions urgent”. This paper starts from the following main questions: 1. Why “Social” Multi-criteria Evaluation? 2. How such an approach should be developed? The foundations of SMCE are set up by referring to concepts coming from complex system theory and philosophy, such as reflexive complexity, post-normal science and incommensurability. To give some operational guidelines on the application of SMCE basic questions to be answered are: 1. How is it possible to deal with technical incommensurability? 2. How can we deal with the issue of social incommensurability? To answer these questions, by using theoretical considerations and lessons learned from realworld case studies, is the main objective of the present article.

[1]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Recent progresses in Multicriteria Decision-Aid , 1994 .

[2]  F. Roberts.  Measurement Theory with Applications to Decisionmaking, Utility, and the Social Sciences: Measurement Theory , 1984 .

[3]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily , 2000 .

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  From substantive to procedural rationality , 1976 .

[5]  G. Munda.  Multiple-criteria decision aid: Some epistemological considerations , 1993 .

[6]  Otto Neurath,et al.  Empiricism and sociology , 1973 .

[7]  H. Simon.  Method and Appraisal in Economics: From substantive to procedural rationality , 1976 .

[8]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues , 1991 .

[9]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  The visions project at the JRC , 2001 .

[10]  B. Roy.  Decision-aid and decision-making , 1990 .

[11]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecological Economics , 1998 .

[12]  G. Munda,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation methods in renewable resource management: integrated water management under drought conditions , 1998 .

[13]  S French,et al.  Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding , 1996 .

[14]  Jean-Claude Vansnick.  On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach) , 1986 .

[15]  John M. Gowdy,et al.  Economic Theory for Environmentalists. , 1995 .

[16]  Robert Rosen,et al.  COMPLEXITY AS A SYSTEM PROPERTY , 1977 .

[17]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessments of Societal Metabolism: Integrating Biophysical and Economic Representations Across Scales , 2000 .

[18]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  Multicriteria procedural rationality on SISDEMA , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis in integrated environmental assessment: some methodological issues , 1996 .

[20]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessment of Societal Metabolism: Introducing the Approach , 2000 .

[21]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making , 1986 .

[22]  B. Roy,et al.  L'analyse Coûts-Avantages, outil de concertation et de légitimation , 2002 .

[23]  Sylvie Faucheux,et al.  Valuation for sustainable development: methods and policy indicators. , 1998 .

[24]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[25]  Serafín Corral Quintana.  Una metodología integrada de exploración y compresión de los procesos de elaboración de políticas públicas , 2000 .

[26]  Felix Rauschmayer.  Ethics of multicriteria analysis , 2000 .

[27]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[28]  M. Giampietro.  Using hierarchy theory to explore the concept of sustainable development , 1994 .

[29]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[30]  Peter Geach,et al.  Good and Evil , 1956 .

[31]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment , 1995 .

[32]  B. Roy.  Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision , 1985 .

[33]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  An Additive Value Function Technique with a Fuzzy Outranking Relation for Dealing with Poor Intercriteria Preference Information , 1990 .

[34]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity , 1999 .

[35]  Carlo Jaeger,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science. , 2003 .

[36]  Daniel W. Bromley,et al.  Searching for sustainability: The poverty of spontaneous order 1 Paper presented to the Fourth Bienn , 1998 .

[37]  N. Hanley,et al.  Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation , 1995 .

[38]  Maurice Landry,et al.  A stakeholder approach to MCDA , 1998 .

[39]  Adel Guitouni,et al.  Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Ethical issues in modeling: Some reflections , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA , 1990 .

[43]  G. Munda.  Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics , 1995 .

[44]  G. Munda.  Environmental Economics, Ecological Economics, and the Concept of Sustainable Development , 1997, Environmental Values.

[45]  H. Simon,et al.  Reason in Human Affairs. , 1984 .

[46]  Arthur Koestler,et al.  Beyond Atomism and Holism—the Concept of the Holon , 2015 .

[47]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning , 1990 .

[48]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Noncompensatory and generalized noncompensatory preference structures , 1986 .

[49]  João Clímaco.  Uma reflexão crítica da decisão óptima , 2001 .