Partisan Politics

Only a few studies of the lower federal court confirmation process consider the role of the race/gender of nominees in that process and none consider the intersection of party politics with those characteristics. We address this deficiency, arguing that the different electoral incentive structures of the two major parties have consequences for the treatment of minority and female nominees. The levels of minority and female support enjoyed by the Democratic Party, as well as the Republican Party’s desire to shed its reputation as being insensitive to issues of importance to those constituencies, lead us to expect that the nominations of minorities and women will be handled most expeditiously under conditions of unified Republican control, followed by unified Democratic control, divided control with a Republican president and divided control with a Democratic president. Our empirical analysis provides partial support for this hierarchy and demonstrates the importance of considering the conditioning effect of partisan politics.

[1]  C. R. Covington.  Legislating Together: The White House and Capitol Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. , 1991 .

[2]  J. R. Bond,et al.  Polarized politics : Congress and the President in a partisan era , 2000 .

[3]  Douglas A. Hibbs,et al.  Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[4]  F. Sorauf.  Party politics in America , 1976 .

[5]  J. R. Bond,et al.  The President in the Legislative Arena , 1992 .

[6]  T. Uhlman.  Race, Recruitment, and Representation: Background Differences Between Black and White Trial Court Judges , 1977 .

[7]  O. Swank.  Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy , 1996 .

[8]  H. Pitkin.  The Concept of Representation , 1969 .

[9]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices , 1999 .

[10]  B. Norrander.  THE EVOLUTION OF THE GENDER GAP , 1999, Princeton Readings in American Politics.

[11]  Lauren C. Bell.  Senatorial Discourtesy: The Senate's Use of Delay to Shape the Federal Judiciary , 2002 .

[12]  B. Grofman,et al.  The Potential Electoral Disadvantages of a Catch-All Party , 1999 .

[13]  T. Uhlman.  Black Elite Decision Making: The Case of Trial Judges , 1978 .

[14]  W. Martinek,et al.  To Advise and Consent: The Senate and Lower Federal Court Nominations, 1977-1998 , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[15]  Donald R. Songer,et al.  The Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Lower Federal Courts , 2004 .

[16]  T. G. Walker,et al.  The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[17]  Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,et al.  Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science , 1997 .

[18]  Nolan McCarty,et al.  Advice and Consent: Senate Responses to Executive Branch Nominations 1885- 1996 , 1999 .

[19]  Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,et al.  Duration models and proportional hazards in political science , 2001 .

[20]  S. Goldman.  Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals, 1961–1964 , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[21]  H. Weisberg.  THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF A NEW VOTING GAP MARITAL DIFFERENCES IN AMERICAN VOTING , 1987 .

[22]  J. R. Bond,et al.  From Abe Fortas to Zoë Baird: Why Some Presidential Nominations Fail in the Senate , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[23]  B. Grofman,et al.  Why Gain in the Senate but Midterm Loss in the House? Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 1998 .

[24]  Brandice Canes-Wrone,et al.  Presidential Approval and Legislative Success , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[25]  P. T. Robinson.  Whither the Future of Blacks in the Republican Party , 1982 .

[26]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  Delaying Justice(s): A Duration Analysis of Supreme Court Confirmations , 2003 .

[27]  J. R. Bond,et al.  Evidence of Increasing Polarization among Ordinary Citizens , 2001 .

[28]  Rorie L. Spill,et al.  Existing Diversity and Judicial Selection: The Role of the Appointment Method in Establishing Gender Diversity in State Supreme Courts , 2002 .

[29]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes" , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[30]  J. Bibby.  Politics, parties, and elections in America , 1987 .

[31]  Lauren C. Bell.  Warring Factions; Interest Groups, Money and the New Politics of Senate Confirmation , 2002 .

[32]  Richard F. Fenno,et al.  Strategy and Sophisticated Voting in the Senate , 1994, The Journal of Politics.

[33]  H. W. Chase.  Federal judges: the appointing process , 1972 .

[34]  D. Songer,et al.  Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting , 1992 .

[35]  A. Campbell.  SURGE AND DECLINE: A STUDY OF ELECTORAL CHANGE , 1960 .

[36]  D. Songer,et al.  A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts: Gender Effects in the Courts of Appeals , 1994, The Journal of Politics.

[37]  J. W. Peltason.  Federal courts in the political process , 1955 .

[38]  Sally Selden.  Representative Bureaucracy , 1997 .

[39]  C. Cameron.  The Politics of Scandals : The Case of Supreme Court Nominations , 1877-1994 , 2003 .

[40]  Keith T. Poole,et al.  RECOVERING A BASIC SPACE FROM A SET OF ISSUE SCALES , 1998 .

[41]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics , 1989 .

[42]  S. Goldman.  Judicial Appointments to the United States Courts of Appeals , 1967 .

[43]  Gary Zuk,et al.  A Bench That Looks Like America? Representation of African Americans and Latinos on the Federal Courts , 1994, The Journal of Politics.

[44]  Merle Black.  Regional and Partisan Bases of Congressional Support for the Changing Agenda of Civil Rights Legislation , 1979, Journal of Politics.

[45]  B. Grofman,et al.  The Power of Ideologically Concentrated Minorities , 1999 .

[46]  Jonathan Nagler,et al.  Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980-1992 , 1998 .

[47]  Drude Dahlerup.  Carol M. Mueller (ed.), The Politics of the Gender Gap. The Social Construction of Political Influence, Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1988, 316 s., £ 14.50. , 1989 .

[48]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics , 1989 .

[49]  Virginia A. Hettinger,et al.  Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas , 2001 .

[50]  Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,et al.  The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement , 1997 .

[51]  Donald R. Songer,et al.  The Impact of Party and Region On Voting Decisions in the United States Courts of Appeals, 1955-1986 , 1990 .

[52]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[53]  F. Maltzman,et al.  Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947-1998 , 2002 .

[54]  David P. Redlawsk,et al.  Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making , 2001 .

[55]  T. Cronin.  The state of the Presidency , 1980 .

[56]  R. Hartley,et al.  The Increasing Senate Scrutiny of Lower Federal Court Nominees , 2002 .

[57]  S. Goldman.  Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[58]  Samuel Kernell,et al.  Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership , 1987 .

[59]  David Nixon,et al.  Confirmation Delay for Vacancies on the Circuit Courts of Appeals , 2001 .

[60]  Kerry L. Haynie,et al.  Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[61]  Reginald S. Sheehan.  Popular Justice: Presidential Prestige and Executive Success in the Supreme Court , 2003 .