What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

WHEN different images are presented to the two eyes, they compete for perceptual dominance, such that one image is visible while the other is suppressed. This binocular rivalry is thought to reflect competition between monocular neurons within the primary visual cortex1. However, neurons whose activity correlates with perception during rivalry are found mainly in higher cortical areas, and respond to input from both eyes2,3. Thus rivalry may involve competition between alternative perceptual interpretations at a higher level of analysis. To investigate this, we tested the effect of rapidly alternating the rival stimuli between the two eyes. Under these conditions, the perceptual alternations exhibit the same temporal dynamics as with static patterns, and a single phase of perceptual dominance can span multiple alternations of the stimuli. Thus neural representations of the two stimuli compete for visual awareness independently of the eye through which they reach the higher visual areas. This finding places binocular rivalry in the general category of multi stable phenomena, such as ambiguous figures, and provides a new way to study the neural cause and resolution of perceptual ambiguities.

[1]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. , 1989, Science.

[2]  P. Walker Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[3]  R. Blake,et al.  What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry? , 1980, Perception.

[4]  R. Blake A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[5]  W. Levelt The alternation process in binocular rivalry , 1966 .

[6]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[7]  Lathrop Rg First-order response dependencies at a differential brightness threshold. , 1966 .

[8]  J J Kulikowski Binocular chromatic rivalry and single vision , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Fox,et al.  Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression , 1970 .

[11]  R. Fox,et al.  Binocular rivalry and reciprocal inhibition , 1969 .

[12]  P. Whittle,et al.  Some experiments on figural effects in binocular rivalry , 1968 .

[13]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Stereoscopic Depth Perception , 1962 .

[14]  R. Fox,et al.  Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  R. Blake,et al.  Binocular rivalry suppression: insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. , 1974, Vision research.

[16]  Robert Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1967 .

[17]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[18]  K. Crain Binocular Rivalry: Its Relation to Intelligence, and General Theory of its Nature and Physiological Correlates , 1961 .

[19]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Influence of Spatial Frequency, Luminance, and Duration on Binocular Rivalry and Abnormal Fusion of Briefly Presented Dichoptic Stimuli , 1983, Perception.

[20]  R. Blake,et al.  On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.