PERSUASION: INSIGHTS FROM THE SELF VALIDATION HYPOTHESIS

This article describes the basic mechanisms underlying persuasion highlighting the role of a recently discovered new process—called self-validation. Unlike previous mechanisms in attitude change that focus on primary or first-order cognition, this new process emphasizes secondary or meta-cognition. The key notion of self-validation is that generating thoughts is not sufficient for them to have an impact on judgment. Rather, one must also have confidence in them. We review research revealing that this new mechanism can account for some already established outcomes in persuasion, but by a different process than postulated previously, as well as for some new findings. Specifically, we describe how source (e.g., credibility), recipient (e.g., bodily responses), message (e.g., matching), and context (e.g., repetition) variables can influence persuasion by affecting thought-confidence. We also describe how establishing a basic mechanism such as self-validation can provide a novel framework for understanding a variety of additional phenomenon in the domain of persuasion and beyond.

[1]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Body posture effects on self‐evaluation: A self‐validation approach , 2009 .

[2]  R. Petty,et al.  5. Implicit ambivalence: a meta-cognitive approach , 2009 .

[3]  F. Strack,et al.  4 Attitudes and Cognitive Consistency * The Role of Associative and Propositional Processes , 2022 .

[4]  Piotr Winkielman,et al.  Embodied Grounding Social , Cognitive , Affective , and Neuroscientific Approaches , 2009 .

[5]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence and Message-Based Persuasion: Motivated Processing of Proattitudinal Information and Avoidance of Counterattitudinal Information , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  What's in a frame anyway?: A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty , 2008 .

[7]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches , 2008 .

[8]  R. Petty,et al.  Persuasion: From Single to Multiple to Metacognitive Processes , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  Kenneth G. DeMarree In Search Of Individual Differences In The Use Of Mental Contents , 2008 .

[10]  R. Petty,et al.  Embodied persuasion: fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes , 2008 .

[11]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The Source-Context-Elaboration Model. , 2008 .

[12]  Adam Kowol The theory of cognitive dissonance By , 2008 .

[13]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength , 2007 .

[15]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  G. Clore,et al.  How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Kenneth G. DeMarree,et al.  The Effect of Self-Affirmation in Nonthreatening Persuasion Domains: Timing Affects the Process , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  MULTIPLE ROLES FOR SOURCE CREDIBILITY UNDER HIGH ELABORATION: IT'S ALL IN THE TIMING , 2007 .

[19]  R. Petty,et al.  Ease of retrieval effects in social judgment: the role of unrequested cognitions. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  11. The role of metacognition in social judgment , 2007 .

[21]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  The role of meta-cognitive processes in emotional intelligence. , 2006, Psicothema.

[22]  L. Vaughn,et al.  Regulatory fit as input for stop rules. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  R. Petty,et al.  When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion , 2006 .

[24]  R. Petty,et al.  Fundamental processes leading to attitude change : Implications for cancer prevention communications , 2006 .

[25]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  John G. Lynch Accessibility-Diagnosticity and the Multiple Pathway Anchoring and Adjustment Model , 2006 .

[27]  R. Petty,et al.  The Role of MetaCognition in Social Judgment , 2006 .

[28]  R. Petty,et al.  Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Not all stereotyping is created equal: differential consequences of thoughtful versus non-thoughtful stereotyping. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  R. Petty,et al.  Understanding Social Judgment: Multiple Systems And Processes , 2006 .

[31]  M. Zanna,et al.  An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. , 2004 .

[32]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Self‐Validation of Cognitive Responses to Advertisements , 2004 .

[34]  Michel Tuan Pham The Logic of Feeling , 2004 .

[35]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  S. Segerstrom,et al.  A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: what's on your mind, and how, and how much? , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Overt head movements and persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[39]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. , 2003 .

[40]  R. Petty,et al.  Ease of Retrieval Effects in Persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis , 2002 .

[41]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  R. Petty,et al.  Mass Media Attitude Change: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 2002 .

[43]  M. Zanna,et al.  Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  R. Petty,et al.  16. Attitude change: the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion , 2002 .

[45]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[46]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  J. Forgas Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition , 2001 .

[48]  R. Petty,et al.  Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self , 2000 .

[50]  E. Higgins Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[51]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Affect as information , 2013 .

[52]  Kathryn C. Oleson,et al.  Subjective overachievement: individual differences in self-doubt and concern with performance. , 2000, Journal of personality.

[53]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: the role of emotion specificity. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Leonard L. Martin Moods do not convey information: Moods in context do. , 2000 .

[55]  Jason Hart,et al.  Are the Tabloids Always Wrong or Is That Just What We Think? Need for Cognition and Perceptions of Articles in Print Media , 1999 .

[56]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[57]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[58]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  HELP, I NEED SOMEBODY: AUTOMATIC ACTION AND INACTION , 1998 .

[59]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing Perceptions of Vulnerability: Personal Relevance and the Use of Experiential Information in Health Judgments , 1998 .

[60]  W. Crano,et al.  The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. , 1998 .

[61]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[62]  Jill A. Jacobson,et al.  Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking. , 1997 .

[63]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Terror Management Theory of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews: Empirical Assessments and Conceptual Refinements , 1997 .

[64]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction , 1997 .

[65]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitudes and attitude change. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[66]  Bell,et al.  Ambivalence and Persuasion: The Processing of Messages about Immigrant Groups , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[67]  R. Petty,et al.  The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  E. Higgins Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[69]  A. Koriat,et al.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. , 1996, Psychological review.

[70]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: the hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  R. Petty,et al.  Elaboration as a Determinant of Attitude Strength: Creating Attitudes That Are Persistent, Resistant, and Predictive of Behavior , 1995 .

[72]  M. Zanna,et al.  Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. , 1995 .

[73]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[74]  W. Wood,et al.  Minority influence: a meta-analytic review of social influence processes. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[76]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .

[77]  R. Petty,et al.  Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions , 1993 .

[78]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[79]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[80]  Gabriel Mugny,et al.  The Social Psychology of Minority Influence , 1991 .

[81]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications , 1991 .

[82]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[83]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[84]  Ruben Orive,et al.  Group Consensus, Action Immediacy, and Opinion Confidence , 1988 .

[85]  R. Orive Social projection and social comparison of opinions. , 1988 .

[86]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[87]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. , 1988 .

[88]  C. Steele The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[89]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. , 1986 .

[90]  J. Greenberg,et al.  The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory , 1986 .

[91]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[92]  R. Petty,et al.  lhe Effects of Overt Head Movements on Persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of Responses , 1980 .

[93]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments , 1980 .

[94]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Toward A Theory of Conversion Behavior , 1980 .

[95]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[96]  A. Beck,et al.  Brief Cognitive Therapies , 1979 .

[97]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[98]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[99]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[100]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Similarity in the influence process: The belief-value distinction. , 1973 .

[101]  K. Kaplan On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. , 1972 .

[102]  D. Bem Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[103]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[104]  A. Greenwald 6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[105]  C. Staats,et al.  Attitudes established by classical conditioning. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[106]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[107]  L. Festinger Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[108]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.