Structural Behavior of Bent Cap Beams in As-built and Retrofitted Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges

Author(s): Moustafa, Mohamed Aly Abdel-Razik | Advisor(s): Mosalam, Khalid M | Abstract: Research on resilient infrastructure systems is expanding. As we experience more infrastructure deterioration in the US, numerous efforts are ongoing for building the nation's new infrastructure and maintaining the existing one. Bridges are key components of infrastructure that are vulnerable to earthquakes and are undergoing retrofit or complete replacement. Thus, optimized seismic design of new bridges and informed retrofit decisions are indispensable. A specific design issue that is concerned with the structural response of bent cap beams in as-built and retrofitted box-girder bridges under gravity and seismic loads is tackled in this dissertation. The lack of proper account of box-girder slabs contribution to the integral bent cap can lead to an uneconomical seismic design of new bridges or unfavorable mode of failure in retrofitting existing ones. A combined experimental and computational research was undertaken in this study to investigate the structural behavior and seismic response of bent cap beams in as-built and retrofitted reinforced concrete box-girder bridges under the combined effect of vertical and lateral loading. In particular, the contribution of the box-girder slabs to the stiffness and strength of the integral bent caps was evaluated for optimized design and enhanced capacity estimation. The computational part of the study consisted of two phases: pre-test and post-test analyses. The experimental program involved testing two 1/4-scale column-bent cap beam-box girder subassembly using quasi-static and Hybrid Simulation (HS) testing methods. The test specimens were adopted from a typical California bridge that is modified from the Caltrans Academy Bridge, and were designed in light of the most recent AASHTO and Caltrans provisions. The pre-test analysis phase of the computational research utilized one-, two-, and three-dimensional finite element models to carry out different linear and nonlinear static and time history analyses for both of the full prototype bridge and the test specimen. The pre-test analysis successfully verified the expected subassembly behavior and provided beneficial input for the experimental program. The first stage of the experimental program involved quasi-static cyclic loading tests of the first specimen in as-built and repaired conditions. Bidirectional cyclic loading tests in both transverse and longitudinal directions were conducted under constant gravity load. A rapid repair scheme was adopted for the tested specimen using a Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) column jacket. A similar quasi-static cyclic test to the as-built specimen was carried out for the repaired specimen for comparison purposes and to verify the essentially elastic status of the bent cap beam. The second stage of the experimental study embraced the HS testing technique for providing the lateral earthquake loading to the test specimens. A new practical approach that utilized readily available laboratory data acquisition systems as a middleware for feasible HS communication was achieved as part of this study. The proper communication among the HS components and the verification of the HS system were first performed using tests conducted on standalone hydraulic actuators. A full specimen HS trial test was conducted using the previously tested repaired specimen to validate the whole HS system. The last phase in the experimental program involved retrofitting the column of the second specimen using CFRP jacketing before any testing to increase the demands on the bent cap beam for further investigation into its inelastic range of structural response. The retrofitted second specimen was then tested using multi-degree of freedom HS under constant gravity load using several scales of unidirectional and bidirectional near-fault ground motions. The post-test analysis was the final stage of this study. The results from the as-built first specimen cyclic tests were used to calibrate the most detailed three-dimensional finite element model, which was previously developed as part of the pre-test analysis stage. The calibrated model was used to explore the effect of reducing the bent cap reinforcement on the overall system behavior and to investigate the box-girder contribution at higher levels of bent cap seismic demand. Based on the computational and experimental results obtained in this study, the effective slab width for integral bent caps was revisited. The study concluded that the slab reinforcement within an effective width, especially in tension, should be included for accurate bent cap capacity estimation. The study was finalized with an illustrative design example to investigate the design implications of the revised effective slab width and bent cap capacity estimation on the optimization of the bent cap design for a full-scale bridge.

[1]  Xin-jiang Cai,et al.  Seismic Hybrid Simulation of a Multi-Span Bridge , 2009 .

[2]  T. Paulay,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1975 .

[3]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Generalized‐α methods for seismic structural testing , 2004 .

[4]  Yuan-Sen Yang,et al.  ISEE: Internet‐based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering—Part I: Database approach , 2007 .

[5]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Reliability of Pseudodynamic Test in Earthquake Response Simulation , 1989 .

[6]  Gottfried Brendel Strength of the Compression Slab of T-Beams Subject to Simple Bending , 1964 .

[7]  M. Ehsani,et al.  Behavior of external reinforced concrete beam to column connections subjected to earthquake type loading , 1982 .

[8]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Seismic Demands for Performance-Based Design of Bridges , 2003 .

[9]  John W. Wallace,et al.  Evaluation of UBC-94 Provisions for Seismic Design of RC Structural Walls , 1996 .

[10]  Shuenn-Yih Chang Improved numerical dissipation for explicit methods in pseudodynamic tests , 1997 .

[11]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Evaluation of some implicit time-stepping algorithms for pseudodynamic tests , 1996 .

[12]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Integration Techniques for Substructure Pseudo Dynamic Test , 1990 .

[13]  A. Blakeborough,et al.  Improved control algorithm for real‐time substructure testing , 2001 .

[14]  David A. Pecknold Slab Effective Width for Eqivalent Frame Analysis , 1975 .

[15]  Tarek Elkhoraibi,et al.  Generalized hybrid simulation framework for structural systems subjected to seismic loading , 2007 .

[16]  Vesna Terzic Post-earthquake traffic capacity of modern bridges in California. , 2009 .

[17]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics , 1977 .

[18]  S. Pantazopoulou,et al.  SLAB PARTICIPATION IN PRACTICAL EARTHQUAKE DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES , 2001 .

[19]  K. Campbell,et al.  THE VERTICAL-TO-HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRAL RATIO AND TENTATIVE PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPING SIMPLIFIED V/H AND VERTICAL DESIGN SPECTRA , 2004 .

[20]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Hybrid Seismic Response Simulation on a Geographically Distributed Bridge Model , 2008 .

[21]  K. Campbell,et al.  Updated Near-Source Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations for the Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration and Acceleration Response Spectra , 2003 .

[22]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Experimental and Computational Evaluation of In-Span Hinges in Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges , 2011 .

[23]  James K. Wight,et al.  Closure of "Strength Decay of RC Columns under Shear Reversals" , 1976 .

[24]  Marios Panagiotou,et al.  Seismic Response of a Damage-Resistant Recentering Posttensioned-HYFRC Bridge Column , 2015 .

[25]  Catherine Wolfgram French,et al.  Contribution of R/C Floor Slabs in Resisting Lateral Loads , 1989 .

[26]  Steven L. Kramer,et al.  Performance-Based Evaluation of Bridges on Liquefiable Soils , 2007 .

[27]  Frieder Seible,et al.  Bridge Knee Joint with Headed Reinforcement , 1995 .

[28]  Christopher R. Thewalt,et al.  Behavior of Bridge Outrigger Knee Joint Systems , 1995 .

[29]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Tension Flange Effective Width in Reinforced ConcreteShear Walls , 2003 .

[30]  Pedro F. Silva,et al.  Development of a Performance Evaluation Database for Concrete Bridge Components and Systems under Simulated Seismic Loads , 2000 .

[31]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTED HYBRID SIMULATION OF 2-SPAN CONTINUOUS BRIDGE , 2008 .

[32]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Improved time integration for pseudodynamic tests , 1998 .

[33]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Computer Controlled Seismic Performance Testing , 1980 .

[34]  J. Moehle,et al.  Effect of Foor Slab on Behavior of Slab-Beam-Column Connections , 1991, SP-123: Design of Beam-Column Joints for Seismic Resistance.

[35]  M. Ehsani,et al.  Effect of Transverse Beams and Slab on Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections , 1985 .

[36]  Pedro F. Silva,et al.  Hybrid simulation of curved four-span bridge: Comparison of numerical and hybrid experimental/analytical results and methods of numerical model calibration , 2013 .

[37]  Shuenn-Yih Chang,et al.  Explicit Pseudodynamic Algorithm with Unconditional Stability , 2002 .

[38]  Ulrich Füllekrug,et al.  On real-time pseudo-dynamic sub-structure testing: algorithm, numerical and experimental results , 2005 .

[39]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Improving the inverse compensation method for real‐time hybrid simulation through a dual compensation scheme , 2009 .

[40]  Van Thuan Nguyen,et al.  ADAPTIVE ERROR COMPENSATION BASED ON ONLINE SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FOR REAL-TIME SUBSTRUCTURE TESTING , 2009 .

[41]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Development of a testing protocol for woodframe structures , 1999 .

[42]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Pseudodynamic tests of a concentrically braced frame using substructuring techniques , 1994 .

[43]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS IN DOUBLE-DECK REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE FRAMES , 2001 .

[44]  Pui-Shum B. Shing,et al.  Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests , 1991 .

[45]  Gérard Michot,et al.  The Brazilian test: a tool for measuring the toughness of a material and its brittle to ductile transition , 2006 .

[46]  John W. Wallace,et al.  Displacement-Based Design of Slender Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls—Experimental Verification , 2004 .

[47]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Considerations for the Use of Quasi-Static Testing , 1996 .

[48]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structural Components and Systems , 2006 .

[49]  Mo Shing Cheung,et al.  FINITE STRIP EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVE FLANGE WIDTH OF BRIDGE GIRDERS , 1978 .

[50]  Selim Günay,et al.  Seismic performance evaluation of high voltage disconnect switches using real‐time hybrid simulation: I. System development and validation , 2014 .

[51]  Ya-Ying Chang Multi-site network hybrid testing of a multi-span bridge system , 2008 .

[52]  Richard N. White,et al.  Structural Modeling and Experimental Techniques , 1999 .

[53]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL EVALUATION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTIONS FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[54]  Y. Namita,et al.  Real‐time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber , 1999 .

[55]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  REAL-TIME SUBSTRUCTURE TESTS USING HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR , 1999 .

[56]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  LOADING HISTORIES FOR CYCLIC TESTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS , 2009 .

[57]  Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou,et al.  MODELING SLAB CONTRIBUTION IN FRAME CONNECTIONS , 1992 .

[58]  Toshihiko Horiuchi,et al.  A new method for compensating actuator delay in real–time hybrid experiments , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[59]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Cyclic Loading Histories for Seismic Experimentation on Structural Components , 1996 .

[60]  Gregory L Fenves,et al.  BEHAVIOR AND FAILURE ANALYSIS OF A MULTIPLE-FRAME HIGHWAY BRIDGE IN THE 1994 NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE , 1998 .

[61]  Stephen A MAHIN,et al.  DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS TO MULTIDIRECTIONAL EXCITATIONS , 1999 .

[62]  T. Shantz,et al.  Influence of Design Ground Motion Level on Highway Bridge Costs , 2004 .

[63]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  ISEE: Internet‐based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering—Part II: The application protocol approach , 2007 .

[64]  Y. K. Cheung,et al.  Folded Plate Structures by Finite Strip Method , 1969 .

[65]  Selim Günay,et al.  Seismic performance evaluation of high‐voltage disconnect switches using real‐time hybrid simulation: II. Parametric study , 2014 .

[66]  Bozidar Stojadinovic,et al.  Implementation and Accuracy of Continuous Hybrid Simulation with Geographically Distributed Substructures , 2005 .

[67]  Glenn Matthew Dryden,et al.  The Integration of Experimental and Simulation Data in the Study of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Systems Including Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction , 2009 .

[68]  Σταυροσ Δερμιτζακησ,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SUBSTRUCTURING TECHNIQUES FOR ON-LINE COMPUTER CONTROLLED SEISMIC PERFORMANCE TESTING , 1985 .

[69]  T Paulay,et al.  New Zealand Tests on Full-Scale Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column-Slab Subassemblages Designed for Earthquake Resistance , 1991, SP-123: Design of Beam-Column Joints for Seismic Resistance.

[70]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  RESPONSE OF INFILLED FRAMES USING PSEUDO-DYNAMIC EXPERIMENTATION , 1998 .

[71]  James K. Wight,et al.  Experimental and analytical study of internal beam to column connections subjected to reversed cyclic loading , 1982 .

[72]  I. Miranda,et al.  Implicit-Explicit Finite Elements in Nonlinear Transient Analysis , 1979 .

[73]  Marta Alcocer,et al.  Investigación acción participativa , 1998 .

[74]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Cumulative experimental errors in pseudodynamic tests , 1987 .

[75]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Simple Analytical Model for T-Beams in Flexure , 1988 .

[76]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Parametric Study and Design Recommendations for In-Span Hinges in Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges , 2012 .

[77]  Stergios A. Mitoulis Seismic design of bridges with the participation of seat-type abutments , 2012 .

[78]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2014 .

[79]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Repaired with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Jackets , 2014 .

[80]  M. Nakashima,et al.  Japanese Activities on On‐Line Testing , 1987 .

[81]  Rajesh P. Dhakal,et al.  Bidirectional Cyclic Loading Experiment on a 3D Beam–Column Joint Designed for Damage Avoidance , 2008 .

[82]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  A computational model for reinforced concrete members confined with fiber reinforced polymer lamina: Implementation and experimental validation , 2007 .

[83]  Sung Jig Kim Seismic assessment of RC structures considering vertical ground motion , 2008 .

[84]  Frieder Seible,et al.  NONLINEAR SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE STRUCTURES , 1997 .

[85]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems , 1999 .

[86]  James L. Beck,et al.  Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables , 2002 .

[87]  Hikmat Edward Zerbe,et al.  Effect of a slab on the behavior of exterior beam to column connections , 1985 .

[88]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development of real‐time pseudo dynamic testing , 1992 .

[89]  James K. Wight,et al.  Earthquake Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Interior Connections Including a Floor Slab , 1987 .

[90]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[91]  Catherine Ellen Wolfgram Experimental Modelling and Analysis of Three One-Tenth-Scale Reinforced Concrete Frame-Wall Structures , 1984 .

[92]  George Gazetas,et al.  Seismic response of single-column bent on pile: evidence of beneficial role of pile and soil inelasticity , 2009 .

[93]  Catherine Wolfgram French,et al.  R/C Beam‐Column‐Slab Subassemblages Subjected to Lateral Loads , 1989 .

[94]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Effect of Vertical Acceleration on Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 2014 .

[95]  S. J. Pantazopoulou,et al.  Response of RC Frame under Lateral Loads , 1991 .

[96]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing , 1985 .

[97]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[98]  Georges Magonette Development and application of large–scale continuous pseudo–dynamic testing techniques , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[99]  Chris Thewalt,et al.  Performance Parameters for Pseudodynamic Tests , 1994 .

[100]  A B Miller THE EFFECTIVE WIDTH OF A PLATE SUPPORTED BY A BEAM. , 1929 .

[101]  A. Shelman,et al.  Advancing the seismic design of reinforced concrete bridge columns , 2013 .