Follow the reader: filtering comments on slashdot

Large-scale online communities need to manage the tension between critical mass and information overload. Slashdot is a news and discussion site that has used comment rating to allow massive participation while providing a mechanism for users to filter content. By default, comments with low ratings are hidden. Of users who changed the defaults, more than three times as many chose to use ratings for filtering or sorting as chose to suppress the use of comment ratings. Nearly half of registered users, however, never strayed from the default filtering settings, suggesting that the costs of exploring and selecting custom filter settings exceeds the expected benefit for many users. We recommend leveraging the efforts of the users that actively choose filter settings to reduce the cost of changing settings for all other users. One strategy is to create static schemas that capture the filtering preferences of different groups of readers. Another strategy is to dynamically set filtering thresholds for each conversation thread, based in part on the choices of previous readers. For predicting later readers' choices, the choices of previous readers are far more useful than content features such as the number of comments or the ratings of those comments.

[1]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  I-DIAG: from community discussion to knowledge distillation , 2003 .

[2]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[3]  C. Dennis Allen,et al.  User customization of a word processor , 1996, CHI.

[4]  G. Olson,et al.  From Laboratories to Collaboratories: A New Organizational Form for Scientific Collaboration , 1997 .

[5]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  John Riedl,et al.  GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews , 1994, CSCW '94.

[7]  Pier Luca Lanzi,et al.  Mining interesting knowledge from weblogs: a survey , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[8]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus , 2004, CHI.

[9]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Social and temporal structures in everyday collaboration , 2004, CHI.

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[11]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space , 2004, CHI.

[12]  Loren Terveen,et al.  Beyond Recommender Systems: Helping People Help Each Other , 2001 .

[13]  Joshua R. Smith Debate, Division, and Diversity: Political Discourse Networks in USENET Newsgroups , 2005 .

[14]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[15]  Marc A. Smith,et al.  Measures and Maps of Usenet , 2003, From Usenet to CoWebs.

[16]  Douglas B. Terry,et al.  Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry , 1992, CACM.

[17]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  User population and user contributions to virtual publics: a systems model , 1999, GROUP.

[18]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[19]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations , 2004, CHI.

[20]  P. Resnick Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital , 2001 .

[21]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community , 2005, GROUP.

[22]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  An empirical exploration of mass interaction system dynamics: individual information overload and Usenet discourse , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Triggers and barriers to customizing software , 1991, CHI.