How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists?

AbstractCollaboration is believed to be influential on researchers’ productivity. However, the impact of collaboration relies on factors such as disciplines, collaboration patterns, and collaborators’ characters. In addition, at different career stages, such as the growth or the establishment career stages of scientists, collaboration is different in scale and scope, and its effect on productivity varies. In this paper, we study the relationships between collaboration and productivity in four disciplines, Organic Chemistry, Virology, Mathematics and Computer Science. Our study found that the productivity is correlated with collaboration in general, but the correlation could be positive or negative on the basis of which aspect of collaboration to measure, i.e., the scale or scope of the collaboration. The correlation becomes stronger as individual scientists progress through various stages of their career. Furthermore, experimental disciplines, such as Organic Chemistry and Virology, have shown stronger correlation coefficients than theoretical ones such as Mathematics and Computer Science.

[1]  Takayuki Nozawa,et al.  Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors' roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas , 2006, Scientometrics.

[2]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital , 2005 .

[4]  R. Srikanth,et al.  Modified collaborative coefficient: a new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration , 2010, Scientometrics.

[5]  Richard Heidler,et al.  Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields , 2010, Scientometrics.

[6]  Ding-wei Huang,et al.  Correlation between impact and collaboration , 2011, Scientometrics.

[7]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship , 1979, Scientometrics.

[8]  Takafumi Suzuki,et al.  An analysis of the connection between researchers’ productivity and their co-authors’ past attributions, including the importance in collaboration networks , 2009, Scientometrics.

[9]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[10]  D. Super.  A life-span, life-space approach to career development , 1980 .

[11]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[12]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[13]  G. Bowker,et al.  Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams , 2004 .

[14]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations , 2007 .

[15]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[17]  Nabil Amara,et al.  The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research , 1998 .

[18]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[19]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? , 2009, Scientometrics.

[20]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Age effects in scientific productivity , 2003, Scientometrics.

[21]  Albert N. Link,et al.  An analysis of policy initiatives to promote strategic research partnerships , 2002 .

[22]  Vesna Olui,et al.  DUAL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIP IN THE STUDY OF COLLABORATION/SCIENTIFIC OUTPUT RELATIONSHIP , 1986 .

[23]  Ricardo B. Duque,et al.  Collaboration Paradox , 2005 .

[24]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university , 2009 .

[25]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[26]  M. Perkmann,et al.  The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-Industry Relations on Public Research , 2009 .

[27]  M. Wright,et al.  Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity : Evidence from the EU framework program , 2009 .

[28]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Age Structures of Scientific Collaboration in Chinese Computer Science , 2001, Scientometrics.

[29]  Meghna Sabharwal,et al.  Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends , 2010 .

[30]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR) , 2003 .

[31]  W. Powell.  Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .