A Fully Automated Method for Segmenting Arteries and Quantifying Vessel Radii on Magnetic Resonance Angiography Images of Varying Projection Thickness

Purpose Precise quantification of cerebral arteries can help with differentiation and prognostication of cerebrovascular disease. Existing image processing and segmentation algorithms for magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are limited to the analysis of either 2D maximum intensity projection images or the entire 3D volume. The goal of this study was to develop a fully automated, hybrid 2D-3D method for robust segmentation of arteries and accurate quantification of vessel radii using MRA at varying projection thicknesses. Methods A novel algorithm that employs an adaptive Frangi filter for segmentation of vessels followed by estimation of vessel radii is presented. The method was evaluated on MRA datasets and corresponding manual segmentations from three healthy subjects for various projection thicknesses. In addition, the vessel metrics were computed in four additional subjects. Three synthetically generated angiographic datasets resembling brain vasculature were also evaluated under different noise levels. Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard Index, F-score, and concordance correlation coefficient were used to measure the segmentation accuracy of manual versus automatic segmentation. Results Our new adaptive filter rendered accurate representations of vessels, maintained accurate vessel radii, and corresponded better to manual segmentation at different projection thicknesses than prior methods. Validation with synthetic datasets under low contrast and noisy conditions revealed accurate quantification of vessels without distortions. Conclusion We have demonstrated a method for automatic segmentation of vascular trees and the subsequent generation of a vessel radii map. This novel technique can be applied to analyze arterial structures in healthy and diseased populations and improve the characterization of vascular integrity.

[1]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Model-Based Detection of Tubular Structures in 3D Images , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[2]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[3]  J Vanderschoot,et al.  Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Simultaneous imaging of radiation‐induced cerebral microbleeds, arteries and veins, using a multiple gradient echo sequence at 7 Tesla , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  D. Zagzag,et al.  Angiogenesis in Gliomas: Biology and Molecular Pathophysiology , 2005, Brain pathology.

[6]  Yi Sun,et al.  Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Tolga Çukur,et al.  Targeted vessel reconstruction in non‐contrast‐enhanced steady‐state free precession angiography , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.

[8]  K. Jellinger,et al.  Prevalence and impact of cerebrovascular pathology in Alzheimer's disease and parkinsonism , 2006, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[9]  Xiangrong Zhou,et al.  A Fast and Fully Automatic Method for Cerebrovascular Segmentation on Time-of-Flight (TOF) MRA Image , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  T L Chenevert,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography: a review. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[11]  S. Aoki,et al.  Magnetic resonance , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[12]  M. Viergever,et al.  Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Renzo Phellan,et al.  Comparison of vessel enhancement algorithms applied to time‐of‐flight MRA images for cerebrovascular segmentation , 2017, Medical physics.

[14]  Tiejun Zhao,et al.  Dual‐echo arteriovenography imaging with 7T MRI , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Timo Krings,et al.  Radiologic assessment of brain arteriovenous malformations: what clinicians need to know. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  Gabriela Csurka,et al.  What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation? , 2013, BMVC.

[17]  Saeed Sadri,et al.  A Review of Coronary Vessel Segmentation Algorithms , 2011, Journal of medical signals and sensors.

[18]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[19]  Jan Sedlacik,et al.  ToF‐SWI: Simultaneous time of flight and fully flow compensated susceptibility weighted imaging , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Automated segmentation of pulmonary vascular tree from 3D CT images , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[21]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[22]  P. Jaccard,et al.  Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura , 1901 .

[23]  Stephen R. Aylward,et al.  Initialization, noise, singularities, and scale in height ridge traversal for tubular object centerline extraction , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Chih-Yang Hsu,et al.  Automatic recognition of subject‐specific cerebrovascular trees , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Orjan Smedby,et al.  New presentation method for magnetic resonance angiography images based on skeletonization , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[26]  Alireza Minagar,et al.  Multiple sclerosis as a vascular disease , 2006, Neurological research.

[27]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Three-dimensional multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medical images , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  Brian E. Chapman,et al.  Comparison of three multiscale vessel enhancement filters intended for intracranial MRA: initial phantom results , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  CURVES: Curve evolution for vessel segmentation , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[30]  J. Gillard,et al.  Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. , 2007, Radiology.

[31]  J A Sethian,et al.  A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Kecheng Liu,et al.  A review on MR vascular image processing: skeleton versus nonskeleton approaches: part II , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[33]  J. Meixensberger,et al.  Delayed Stroke after Aneurysm Treatment with Flow Diverters in Small Cerebral Vessels: A Potentially Critical Complication Caused by Subacute Vasospasm , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[34]  W. L. Benedict,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Journal - Michigan State Medical Society.

[35]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  VascuSynth: Simulating vascular trees for generating volumetric image data with ground-truth segmentation and tree analysis , 2010, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[36]  Zhaoyang Jin,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of MR angiography and venography (MRAV) , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Thomas Boehm,et al.  Effect of slab thickness on the CT detection of pulmonary nodules: use of sliding thin-slab maximum intensity projection and volume rendering. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[39]  Ö. Smedby,et al.  Volume rendering compared with maximum intensity projection for magnetic resonance angiography measurements of the abdominal aorta , 2004, Acta radiologica.