Enzymes and histological differentiation of tumours

The study of enzymes in tumours has been one of the central themes of cancer research for many years. This interest stems from the early discoveries of Warburg (1930) that many kinds of tumours appear to have a specific form of metabolism. Since the ultimate control of metabolism in tissues depends upon the levels of enzyme activity, it was logical to search for possible changes in tumour enzyme content as the primary cause of the alteration in tumour metabolism. A vast literature now exists on the enzymology of many kinds of spontaneous and transplantable tumours of animals (particularly rodents) and of man (Greenstein, 1954; Greenstein, 1956; Aisenberg, 1961; Busch and Starbuck, 1964; Pitot, 1966; Knox, 1967; Shonk and Boxer, 1967; Wenner, 1967). One of the most frequently observed differences between a tumour and its homologous normal tissue has been the reduction or loss of enzyme activity or of the responsiveness of an enzyme to its normal regulatory mechanisms. Demonstration of the loss of enzymes and other proteins in tumours led to formulation of the deletion hypothesis of cancer (Miller and Miller, 1947; Potter, 1958) although this concept can no longer be considered tenable. However, until recently, despite this intensive interest in tumour enzyme activity, it has been difficult to relate the significance of any enzyme changes demonstrated to the histological differentiation of tumours. The principal cause of this has been that in most previous studies efforts were largely directed towards establishing differences in selected enzyme activity between fully established tumours and their homologous normal tissues. Thus, tumours at one stage of histological development only were examined in most cases and any possible differences in enzyme content which might be related to structural variations within a single histogenetic tumour class were not considered. Furthermore, in many studies the choice of enzymes examined was determined on a more or less random rather than on a systematic basis. Sometimes it reflected attempts to establish possible differences in activity of enzymes for diagnostic purposes. More commonly, however, it depended upon the special interests and expertise of the individual investigator or was determined by the reliability of the available analytical methods at the time. Therefore, until fairly recently, any meaningful correlation of enzyme activity with the structural differentiation of tumours has virtually been impossible. However, in the past several years emphasis has shifted towards a more systematic analysis of related groups of enzymes in histologically graded series of tumours derived from a single organ or tissue. The concentration upon tumours of a single homogeneous cell type, which show varying degrees of histological differentiation, is based on the assumption that tumours most closely resembling their homologous normal tissues of origin are most likely to show the deviation from normal which has the greatest relevance to neoplasia (Farber, 1968). The most thoroughly studied tumour system developed to exploit this concept has been derived from the rat liver. In this paper the results of some of these studies will be used to illustrate how the pattern of enzyme and metabolic activity in hepatomas can be related to the extent of their structural differentiation. The implications of these findings for current understanding of the fundamental metabolic changes associated with neoplasia will be discussed.

[1]  K. Mainzer,et al.  Leukaemia Evoked with 7,8,12-Trimethylbenz(a)Anthracene in Rat. III. Changes in Lymphoid Tissues , 1972, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  G. Weber,et al.  Imbalance in ornithine metabolism in hepatomas of different growth rates as expressed in formation of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine. , 1972, Cancer research.

[3]  G. Dunaway,et al.  Metabolic imbalance in carbohydrate, pyrimidine and ornithine utilization. , 1972, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[4]  P. Walker,et al.  Isozyme studies on adult, regenerating, precancerous and developing liver in relation to findings in hepatomas. , 1972, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[5]  W. Criss A review of isozymes in cancer. , 1971, Cancer research.

[6]  S. Weinhouse Isozymes in cancer. , 1971, Cancer research.

[7]  A. Hatzfeld,et al.  Resurgence of two fetal-type of aldolases (A and C) in some fast-growing hepatomas. , 1970, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[8]  G. Friedell,et al.  A series of transplantable rat mammary tumors with graded differentiation, growth rate, and glutaminase content. , 1970, Cancer research.

[9]  S. Weinhouse,et al.  Adenosine triphosphate: adenosine monophosphate phosphotransferase isozymes in rat liver and hepatomas. , 1970, Cancer research.

[10]  G. Weber,et al.  Control of gene expression in carbohydrate, pyrimidine and DNA metabolism. , 1970, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[11]  J. Laszlo,et al.  Separation of DNA polymerase from rat liver and hepatomas. , 1969, Cancer research.

[12]  H. Morris,et al.  Glutaminase activities and growth rates of rat hepatomas. , 1969, Cancer research.

[13]  S. Weinhouse,et al.  Kinetic, electrophoretic, and chromatographic studies on glucose-ATP phosphotransferases in rat hepatomas. , 1969, Cancer research.

[14]  G. Friedell,et al.  The proportionality of glutaminase content to growth rate and morphology of rat neoplasms. , 1969, Cancer research.

[15]  Potter Vr Recent trends in cancer biochemistry: the importance of studies on fetal tissue. , 1969 .

[16]  V. Potter Recent trends in cancer biochemistry: the importance of studies on fetal tissue. , 1969, Proceedings. Canadian Cancer Conference.

[17]  S. Tsuiki,et al.  Fructose 1,6-diphosphatase of rat tissues and transplantable rat hepatomas. , 1969, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[18]  S. Weinhouse,et al.  Metabolic regulation and enzyme alterations in the Morris hepatomas. , 1968, Cancer research.

[19]  E. Farber On the concept of minimum deviation in the study of the biochemistry of cancer. , 1968, Cancer research.

[20]  S. Weinhouse,et al.  Fructokinase, triokinase, and aldolases in liver tumors of the rat. , 1967, Cancer Research.

[21]  J. Uriel,et al.  Association of embryonic antigens with experimentally induced hepatic lesions in the rat. , 1967, Cancer research.

[22]  Dawson Im Enzyme systems at cellular level. , 1967 .

[23]  C. Wenner Progress in tumor enzymology. , 1967, Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology.

[24]  I. M. Dawson Enzyme systems at cellular level. , 1967, Progress in clinical cancer.

[25]  W. Knox,et al.  The enzymic pattern of neoplastic tissue. , 1967, Advances in cancer research.

[26]  H. Pitot Some Biochemical Aspects of Malignancy , 1966 .

[27]  G. Weber,et al.  The molecular correlation concept of neoplasia. , 1966, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[28]  H. Pitot,et al.  Template stability of some enzymes in rat liver and hepatoma. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  H. Morris,et al.  Isozymes of glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase in some rat hepatomas , 1965 .

[30]  H. Morris Studies on the development, biochemistry, and biology of experimental hepatomas. , 1965, Advances in cancer research.

[31]  R. Madden,et al.  ACID PHOSPHATASE IN CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE IN MAN , 1964, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[32]  N. Kaplan,et al.  LACTIC DEHYDROGENASE IN HUMAN NEOPLASTIC TISSUES. , 1964, Cancer research.

[33]  M. Henry,et al.  Correlation of enzyme activities and metabolic pathways with growth rate of hepatomas. , 1964, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[34]  J. Dreyfus,et al.  Anomaly of Aldolase in Primary Liver Cancer , 1963, Nature.

[35]  H. Morris SOME GROWTH, MORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HEPATOMA 5123 AND OTHER NEW TRANSPLANTABLE HEPATOMAS. , 1963, Progress in experimental tumor research.

[36]  F. Bergel Biochemistry of Cancer , 1963, Nature.

[37]  N. Allen Beta‐glucuronidase activities in tumors of the nervous system , 1961, Neurology.

[38]  A. Aisenberg The glycolysis and respiration of tumors , 1961 .

[39]  C. Markert,et al.  MULTIPLE FORMS OF ENZYMES: TISSUE, ONTOGENETIC, AND SPECIES SPECIFIC PATTERNS. , 1959, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  L. Wattenberg A histochemical study of five oxidative enzymes in carcinoma of the large intestine in man. , 1959, The American journal of pathology.

[41]  Potter Vr The biochemical approach to the cancer problem. , 1958 .

[42]  V. Potter The biochemical approach to the cancer problem. , 1958, Federation proceedings.

[43]  J. Greenstein Some biochemical characteristics of morphologically separable cancers. , 1956, Cancer research.

[44]  E. Miller,et al.  The Presence and Significance of Bound Aminoazo Dyes in the Livers of Rats Fed p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene , 1947 .

[45]  J. Shirlaw THE METABOLISM OF TUMOURS , 1931 .