Efficient structured $$\ell 1$$ℓ1 tracker based on laplacian error distribution

Recently, sparse representation has been applied to visual tracking by casting the tracking problem into linear regression problem with sparse coefficient constraint. Under the Gaussian error distribution assumption, the reconstructed loss function is composed of sum-of-squares error term and $$\ell 1$$ℓ1 regularization, which is sensitive to the outliers caused by occlusion and local deformation. In this paper, we propose a robust and efficient $$\ell 1$$ℓ1 tracker based on laplacian error distribution and structured similarity regularization in a particle filter framework. Specifically, we model the error term by laplacian distribution, which has better robustness to the outliers than Gaussian distribution. Meanwhile, in contrast to most existing $$\ell 1$$ℓ1 trackers that handle particles independently, we exploit the dependence relationship between particles and impose the structured similarity regularization on the sparse coefficient set. The customized Inexact Augmented Lagrange Method (IALM) is derived to efficiently solve the optimization problem in batch mode. In addition, we also reveal that the proposed method is related to the robust regression with self-adaptive Huber loss function. Both the computational efficiency and tracking accuracy are enhanced by this novel cost function and optimization strategy. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations on the largest open benchmark video sequences show that our approach outperforms most state-of-the-art trackers.

[1]  Huchuan Lu,et al.  Robust object tracking via sparsity-based collaborative model , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Real time robust L1 tracker using accelerated proximal gradient approach , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Rui Caseiro,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence High-speed Tracking with Kernelized Correlation Filters , 2022 .

[4]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Robust tracking using local sparse appearance model and K-selection , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[5]  Yuji Iwahori,et al.  Hand gesture recognition and animation for local hand motions , 2014, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[6]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Robust visual tracking using ℓ1 minimization , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[7]  Yi Wu,et al.  Online Object Tracking: A Benchmark , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[9]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  Robust Fragments-based Tracking using the Integral Histogram , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[10]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  Context tracker: Exploring supporters and distracters in unconstrained environments , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[11]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Robust Object Tracking with Online Multiple Instance Learning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Rui Caseiro,et al.  Exploiting the Circulant Structure of Tracking-by-Detection with Kernels , 2012, ECCV.

[13]  John Wright,et al.  Dense Error Correction Via $\ell^1$-Minimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Junseok Kwon,et al.  Visual tracking decomposition , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Huchuan Lu,et al.  Visual tracking via adaptive structural local sparse appearance model , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Low-Rank Sparse Learning for Robust Visual Tracking , 2012, ECCV.

[17]  Junseok Kwon,et al.  Tracking by Sampling Trackers , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[18]  Philip H. S. Torr,et al.  Struck: Structured output tracking with kernels , 2011, ICCV.

[19]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Robust Visual Tracking Via Consistent Low-Rank Sparse Learning , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[20]  Li Bai,et al.  Minimum error bounded efficient ℓ1 tracker with occlusion detection , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[21]  Jingdong Wang,et al.  Online Robust Non-negative Dictionary Learning for Visual Tracking , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[22]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Robust visual tracking via multi-task sparse learning , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[23]  Shai Avidan,et al.  Support vector tracking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[24]  Jiri Matas,et al.  P-N learning: Bootstrapping binary classifiers by structural constraints , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[25]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Ieee Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1 Fast Compressive Tracking , 2022 .

[26]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Robust Visual Tracking via Structured Multi-Task Sparse Learning , 2012, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[27]  Zhixun Su,et al.  Linearized Alternating Direction Method with Adaptive Penalty for Low-Rank Representation , 2011, NIPS.

[28]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Incremental Learning for Robust Visual Tracking , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[29]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Real-Time Tracking via On-line Boosting , 2006, BMVC.

[30]  Dit-Yan Yeung,et al.  Learning a Deep Compact Image Representation for Visual Tracking , 2013, NIPS.