Norms and power in learner genres and workplace genres

A common view of a genre (Swales 1990, 2004; Bhatia 1993, 2004) is that it is a class of texts or communicative events with shared purposes, forms, and sociocultural conditions. Hence, if we are to teach genre usefully we have to teach not only the forms, but also their relation to purposes and sociocultural conditions. Furthermore, a genre is an indeterminate class and may consist of subgenres and local, company, or disciplinary variants. As time passes genres and subgenres change and develop. So ideally our teaching gives our students not so much skills with the formal and structural norms of a particular set of genres but a generic competence that allows them to adapt their writing to the situation and its generic requirements. In practice constraints of time and student attention may make this difficult, but institutions of higher education do typically offer various types of practically oriented writing training. Inside the education system there are sets of genres used to enable students to learn content and skills: lab reports, essays, presentations, etc. (Swales 1990), which we can call learner genres. The important audience for such texts is a teacher or examiner who has the right to assess them, and the writer’s aim is often largely to achieve this audience’s approval by meeting norms for form and content set by the audience itself. The writer’s aim to conform is admittedly usually accompanied by a sense of integrity and

[1]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[2]  D. Allison Research Genres: Exploration and Applications, J.M. Swales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004), (pages xii and 314, US$35.00), ISBN: 0521533341 , 2006 .

[3]  J. Swales Research Genres: Explorations and Applications , 2004 .

[4]  S. Parks,et al.  Moving from school to the workplace: disciplinary innovation, border crossings, and the reshaping of a written genre , 2001 .

[5]  C. Maier,et al.  Genre analysis , 2012 .

[6]  Catherine Nickerson,et al.  Playing the corporate language game: an investigation of the genres and discourse strategies in English used by Dutch writers working in multinational corporations , 2000 .

[7]  B. Samraj WORLDS OF WRITTEN DISCOURSE: A GENRE-BASED VIEW , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[8]  Aviva Freedman,et al.  An Activity Theory Analysis of Differences in the Cultures of Two Engineering Firms , 2001 .

[9]  Anne Herrington,et al.  Writing, Teaching, and Learning in the Disciplines , 1994 .

[10]  M. Hoey On the surface of discourse , 1983 .

[11]  Egon Werlich,et al.  A text grammar of English , 1976 .

[12]  Thomas N. Huckin,et al.  Technical writing and professional communication for nonnative speakers of English , 1991 .

[13]  Philip Eubanks,et al.  How Academics and Practitioners Evaluate Technical Texts , 2005 .

[14]  Miscommunication and discourse practices in occupational cultures , 1996 .

[15]  Peter Muntigl,et al.  Introduction: Approaches to Genre , 2005 .

[16]  Christine B. Feak,et al.  Academic Writing for Graduate Students , 1994 .

[17]  Christine Peterson Barabas,et al.  Technical writing in a corporate culture : a study of the nature of information , 1990 .

[18]  Dorothy A. Winsor,et al.  Genre and Activity Systems , 1999 .

[19]  Louis Trimble English for science and technology , 1985 .

[20]  Deanna P. Dannels Learning to Be Professional , 2000 .

[21]  John M. Swales,et al.  Academic writing for graduate students : essential tasks and skills : a course for nonnative speakers of English , 1996 .

[22]  Susan Ohanian Writing in the Real World (Part II of a Two-Part Series). , 1997 .